On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:23:48PM -0700, Spencer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> >Zenaan Harkness:
> >tor-talk is about to be replaced with tor-users.
> >
>
> Tor-users sounds like a usability list.
>
> >
> >[criticism on] tor-talk is going away.
> >
>
> What a shame. With that goes much of the comic re
Hi,
Zenaan Harkness:
tor-talk is about to be replaced with tor-users.
Tor-users sounds like a usability list.
[criticism on] tor-talk is going away.
What a shame. With that goes much of the comic relief ):
Wordlife,
Spencer
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 04:56:57AM +, cicada_3...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 2016-06-30 01:49, Mirimir wrote:
> >On 06/29/2016 01:14 PM, Allen wrote:
> >>>
> If it were up to me, I would vote at this point to ban grarpamp from
> this
> list for at least a month for keeping this topic al
On 2016-06-30 01:49, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/29/2016 01:14 PM, Allen wrote:
If it were up to me, I would vote at this point to ban grarpamp from
this
list for at least a month for keeping this topic alive. While being
a
frequent contributor may have its privileges, the line has been
crossed.
On 06/29/2016 01:14 PM, Allen wrote:
>>
>>> If it were up to me, I would vote at this point to ban grarpamp from this
>>> list for at least a month for keeping this topic alive. While being a
>>> frequent contributor may have its privileges, the line has been crossed.
>>
>> So make your own ban li
>
> > If it were up to me, I would vote at this point to ban grarpamp from this
> > list for at least a month for keeping this topic alive. While being a
> > frequent contributor may have its privileges, the line has been crossed.
>
> So make your own ban list. It's trivially easy to send anythin
On 6/29/16, Allen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:19 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> The post does *not* say anything on the topics, nor have,
>> rather it specifically refers interested people to offsite journalism
>> and participation models *away* from email here.
>> It would also be embarassingly
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:19 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> The post does *not* say anything on the topics, nor have,
> rather it specifically refers interested people to offsite journalism
> and participation models *away* from email here.
> It would also be embarassingly foolish and shameful if we were
The post does *not* say anything on the topics, nor have,
rather it specifically refers interested people to offsite journalism
and participation models *away* from email here.
It would also be embarassingly foolish and shameful if we were
to try censoring via lists of synonyms enacted against all
It's pretty sly, though, not to include Appelbaum's name in the topic.
Mail filters will not work, for example.
On 29.06.16 12:49, Allen wrote:
Can we please stop with this topic? Done. Fini. Banned. Banished.
Barred. Excluded. No more. Thank you.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:12 PM, grar
Can we please stop with this topic? Done. Fini. Banned. Banished.
Barred. Excluded. No more. Thank you.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:12 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> FYI, for those interested in alternative formats other than
> noisy email here or online print rags, there's a reasonably
> complete
11 matches
Mail list logo
