On 12-03-17 00:27, scar wrote:
> My node also was used recently for dorkbot traffic, please see my
> message on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:04:02
> -0500 for details and reply there if can so we can keep the information
> together.
I got similar 'info' from my ISP as in that message.
Very vague despite
grarpamp wrote on 03/10/2017 01:04 PM:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
My system was used for Dorkbot traffic.
How could I block that?
1) 'Exitpolicy reject' the people complaining to you about "bots".
2) Reply to the email they spammed you with by attaching the exit
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Who could exit this way?
Users who want to maybe avoid some arbitrary censorship
caused by sites using dumb blocking tools based on that.
Diagnostics and research.
Etc.
> My system was used for Dorkbot traffic.
> How could I block that
On 10-03-17 13:28, Ivan Markin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:49:59PM +0100, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>> Or could seldomly some traffic exit here?
>
> From dir-spec.txt [1]:
>
> "A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at
> least two of the ports 80, 443, and 6667 and allows exi
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:49:59PM +0100, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If the graphs at atlas show that my exit probability is 0.%, does
> that mean that zero traffic will use my box as exit node?
> Or could seldomly some traffic exit here?
From dir-spec.txt [1]:
"A router is calle
Hello,
If the graphs at atlas show that my exit probability is 0.%, does
that mean that zero traffic will use my box as exit node?
Or could seldomly some traffic exit here?
Kind regards,
Udo
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go t
