Re: [tor-talk] bug in tor 0.3.4.8?

2018-10-20 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
On 06-10-18 01:43, Nick Mathewson wrote: What can I do to help fix the issue? If this is easily reproducible, and you can build from source, using "git bisect" to find the first version that caused it would be very helpful. Do you want more info on how to do that? 0.3.5.3-alpha has an issue

Re: [tor-talk] bug in tor 0.3.4.8?

2018-10-05 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:48 AM Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > > On 17/09/2018 17:46, David Goulet wrote: > > Quickly like that, I can't tell you why this is happening or any workaround > > you could do so keep an eye on the ticket. If this is an 0.3.4.x regression, > > we'll find it quickly. > > Iss

Re: [tor-talk] bug in tor 0.3.4.8?

2018-09-30 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
On 17/09/2018 17:46, David Goulet wrote: Quickly like that, I can't tell you why this is happening or any workaround you could do so keep an eye on the ticket. If this is an 0.3.4.x regression, we'll find it quickly. Issue is still happening, with just port 22 and 53 open. What can I do to help

Re: [tor-talk] bug in tor 0.3.4.8?

2018-09-17 Thread David Goulet
On 17 Sep (15:06:11), Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > On 15/09/2018 18:14, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > > I find a load of these bug mentions in the notices log. > > It happened again. > Any devs reading here? Hello Udo, I've opened https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/27750 with this prob

Re: [tor-talk] bug in tor 0.3.4.8?

2018-09-17 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
On 15/09/2018 18:14, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: I find a load of these bug mentions in the notices log. It happened again. Any devs reading here? Kind regards, Udo -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org

[tor-talk] bug in tor 0.3.4.8?

2018-09-15 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
Hello, I find a load of these bug mentions in the notices log. I run tor-0.3.4.8-0.fc28.x86_64. What now? Sep 15 16:05:03.000 [notice] New control connection opened from 127.0.0.1. Sep 15 16:06:26.000 [warn] tor_bug_occurred_(): Bug: src/or/main.c:1044: conn_close_if_marked: Non-fatal assertio

Re: [tor-talk] Bug?

2018-09-12 Thread Oleg Chernikow
ent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 5:47:53 PM > Subject: [tor-talk] Bug? > > Hello! > After updating the Tor browser to version 8, the ability to see the Tor > network chain has disappeared, through which repeaters it is currently > running. Is it so conceived? It is unreasonab

Re: [tor-talk] Bug?

2018-09-12 Thread Paul Templeton
Just click on the (i) in the URL bar next to the padlock. 137CF322859E400455E457DB920F65FFDD222CDF - Original Message - From: "Oleg Chernikow" To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 5:47:53 PM Subject: [tor-talk] Bug? Hello! After updati

[tor-talk] Bug?

2018-09-12 Thread Oleg Chernikow
Hello! After updating the Tor browser to version 8, the ability to see the Tor network chain has disappeared, through which repeaters it is currently running. Is it so conceived? It is unreasonable, in my opinion. Or is it a bug? In the previous version, after clicking on the onion, the chain was

Re: [tor-talk] Bug in the initial release of Tor Browser 7.5.4

2018-05-14 Thread Nicolas Vigier
On Thu, 10 May 2018, Nathaniel Suchy (Lunorian) wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Yesterday, I noticed, and pointed out on Twitter (See: > https://twitter.com/nathanielrsuchy/status/994284995765243904) that > after updating the browser page still said Tor Browser was out of date. > Shortly there after th

[tor-talk] Bug in the initial release of Tor Browser 7.5.4

2018-05-10 Thread Nathaniel Suchy (Lunorian)
Hi everyone, Yesterday, I noticed, and pointed out on Twitter (See: https://twitter.com/nathanielrsuchy/status/994284995765243904) that after updating the browser page still said Tor Browser was out of date. Shortly there after the Tor Project released a new build fixing the issue. If you updated

Re: [tor-talk] bug

2016-09-12 Thread Joe Btfsplk
On 9/12/2016 9:41 AM, xuzixa...@polyfaust.com wrote: https://www.browserleaks.com/firefox it can be used for both fingerprinting (different users use different OS setups or different Tor versions) and exploiting software vulnerabilities because when attacker don’t know your OS or browser versi

[tor-talk] bug

2016-09-12 Thread xuzixatem
https://www.browserleaks.com/firefox it can be used for both fingerprinting (different users use different OS setups or different Tor versions) and exploiting software vulnerabilities because when attacker don’t know your OS or browser version they don’t know what payload can do the thing that

[tor-talk] Bug of torproject's server?

2014-07-06 Thread ttzeqq
When I tried to reach debs from torproject's server, I got this: http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/Torproject/main/binary-amd64/Packages,404 Not Found [IP: 82.195.75.101 80] http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/Torproject/main/binary-i386/Packages,404 Not Found [IP: 82.195

Re: [tor-talk] Bug of torproject's server?

2014-07-06 Thread AntiTree
Looks like you have "Torproject" instead of your distro name. This should be "lucid" or whatever is the name of your distro. https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:36 PM, ttzeqq wrote: > When I tried to reach debs from torproject's server, I got this: > > http:/

[tor-talk] bug in onion browser

2014-03-10 Thread Jadaan
please read it all and sorry for poor english ! /// i use tor browser and also onion browser purchased from apple store all sites detect that i am using iphone with ios 7.0.6 even when i choose option changer user agent you can check from this link internet.yandex

Re: [tor-talk] Bug Remains: OpenSSL library does not load unless bridges are used

2012-08-10 Thread coderman
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > ... > Not sure I understand what you're talking about here. What is making > you conclude that the openssl library isn't loading? this gentleperson appears confused by static vs. dynamic linking. not every application does it the same!

Re: [tor-talk] Bug Remains: OpenSSL library does not load unless bridges are used

2012-08-09 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, wrote: > This is a followup post on this issue which persists in Linux TBB 32bit, > version 2.2.37-2. > > Any idea for the cause? > > What occurs when it doesn't list the library loading (is the library > loading?) and why it's listed > only on a TBB reload? > >

[tor-talk] Bug Remains: OpenSSL library does not load unless bridges are used

2012-08-04 Thread ming
This is a followup post on this issue which persists in Linux TBB 32bit, version 2.2.37-2. Any idea for the cause? What occurs when it doesn't list the library loading (is the library loading?) and why it's listed only on a TBB reload? Below is a copy/paste from my original post as a refresher

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-29 Thread Jim
Nick Mathewson wrote: Thanks, Tim! If you aren't on windows, and you're comfortable building from source, I'd ask if you can try out the latest version of either the master branch or the maint-0.2.2 branch. I *think* we've got the known non-windows issues pretty well squashed there, so more

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-29 Thread Tim Wilde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2011 10:43 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > If you aren't on windows, and you're comfortable building from > source, I'd ask if you can try out the latest version of either the > master branch or the maint-0.2.2 branch. I *think* we've got the > k

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-29 Thread Nick Mathewson
Thanks, Tim! If you aren't on windows, and you're comfortable building from source, I'd ask if you can try out the latest version of either the master branch or the maint-0.2.2 branch. I *think* we've got the known non-windows issues pretty well squashed there, so more testing to try to discover

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-29 Thread Tim Wilde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2011 9:18 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > These bugs should now be fixed in the git repository. Looks like > we're chasing down a couple more, though, related to geoip and/or > limited windows users. > > Sorry for the trouble; hope we can get

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-29 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:09:38PM -0500, Jon wrote: >> Oct 28 07:51:21.106 [Notice] Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha >> (git-47dff61061f4bfc2). This is experimental software. Do not rely on >> it for strong anonymity. (Running on Windows 7 Service Pack

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-29 Thread Klaus Layer
Roger Dingledine wrote on 28.10.2011: > > That bug is https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4299 > > The more exciting one is > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4343 > which looks related except Tor crashes. Same here. I updated yesterday and all TOR instances are crash

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-29 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:58:53AM +0200, Klaus Layer wrote: > Roger Dingledine wrote on 28.10.2011: > > > > That bug is https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4299 > > > > The more exciting one is > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/4343 > > which looks related except T

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-28 Thread Jon
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:09:38PM -0500, Jon wrote: >> Oct 28 07:51:21.106 [Notice] Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha >> (git-47dff61061f4bfc2). This is experimental software. Do not rely on >> it for strong anonymity. (Running on Windows 7 Service Pack

Re: [tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-28 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:09:38PM -0500, Jon wrote: > Oct 28 07:51:21.106 [Notice] Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha > (git-47dff61061f4bfc2). This is experimental software. Do not rely on > it for strong anonymity. (Running on Windows 7 Service Pack 1 > [workstation]) > > Duplicate call to connection_mark_for_

[tor-talk] bug found on the Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2).

2011-10-28 Thread Jon
Oct 28 07:51:21.106 [Notice] Tor v0.2.3.6-alpha (git-47dff61061f4bfc2). This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on Windows 7 Service Pack 1 [workstation]) Duplicate call to connection_mark_for_close at command.c:1077 (first at command.c:1011) __

[tor-talk] [bug] MAPADDRESS and circuit creation

2011-04-20 Thread grarpamp
I think I found something strange. Consider the following shell script. for exit in list_of_exits ; do mapaddress example.com=example.com.$exit.exit [1] Fire off ten to twenty background processes in parallel that try to connect to example.com. Depending on timing and other issues, some may

Re: [tor-talk] [Bug 280661] SOCKS proxy server connection timeout hard-coded

2011-04-15 Thread tagnaq
On 04/01/2011 09:39 AM, grarpamp wrote: > For those not tracking this... it appears to have been > resolved and committed. I've no idea when it might > appear in an actual release? > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280661 On 04/02/2011 09:53 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > This fix _will_

Re: [tor-talk] [Bug 280661] SOCKS proxy server connection timeout hard-coded

2011-04-01 Thread Mike Perry
Thus spake grarpamp (grarp...@gmail.com): > For those not tracking this... it appears to have been > resolved and committed. I've no idea when it might > appear in an actual release? > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280661 Is this an April Fools joke? Oh wait, it looks like it's fo

[tor-talk] [Bug 280661] SOCKS proxy server connection timeout hard-coded

2011-04-01 Thread grarpamp
For those not tracking this... it appears to have been resolved and committed. I've no idea when it might appear in an actual release? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280661 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://list