It seems that there are some mistakes,Like SocksPolicy reject *:*,waht about
SocksPolicy accept *:*
At 2012-02-23 04:53:24,"Christian Kujau" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm running a Tor bridge for some days now (after shutting down an exit
>node, due to too many DMCA complaints) but it's hardly getting any
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Christian Kujau wrote:
> I'm running a Tor bridge for some days now (after shutting down an
> exit node, due to too many DMCA complaints) but it's hardly getting
> any traffic:
>
> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 11:59 hours, with 2 circuits open.
> I
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 at 19:21, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Sounds like you are thinking that the last hop in the circuit is called
> the exit node, and earlier hops in the circuit are called bridges? This
> is not so.
>
> The last hop in the circuit is the exit relay. Hops other than the last
> are c
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:11:58PM -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 at 15:34, Andreas Krey wrote:
> > They are announced, just not all to the general public. You have to tell
> > your tor client to use bridges; normally it directly talks to (public)
> > relays.
>
> You mean, pe
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 at 15:34, Andreas Krey wrote:
> They are announced, just not all to the general public. You have to tell
> your tor client to use bridges; normally it directly talks to (public) relays.
You mean, people can configure their tor-enabled client just to connect to
a (public) exit-
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:43:40 +, Christian Kujau wrote:
...
> But, isn't this a problem? Porxying through tor is slow enough and when I
> was running an exit node, there was lots of traffic there.
Of course. Exit nodes are scarce, and 'normal' relays (at least mine)
did pick up quite some traf
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 at 08:27, Andreas Krey wrote:
> I don't think so. My bridge get similarly low usage (the
> vidalia-configured just as the hand-setup one), and given the way bridge
> addresses may be handed out, and that you explicitly need to configure
> them, that is not surprising.
But, isn'
On 23.02.2012 08:27, Andreas Krey wrote:
> If anybody in the operational know reads this: What good is it to run
> a bridge that changes its address every day, in view of the way bridge
> addresses are distributed?
From what I understand, this is a problem not of running the bridge on a
changing I
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:53:24 +, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a Tor bridge for some days now (after shutting down an exit
> node, due to too many DMCA complaints) but it's hardly getting any
> traffic:
>
> Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 11:59 hours, with 2 circuits open.
Hi,
I'm running a Tor bridge for some days now (after shutting down an exit
node, due to too many DMCA complaints) but it's hardly getting any
traffic:
Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 11:59 hours, with 2 circuits open.
I've sent 7.34 MB and received 24.86 MB.
I feel like it's configured w
10 matches
Mail list logo
