On 06/11/2014 02:23 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> Some detect that I'm doing console-level snapshot, and throw errors.
>> Some of the errors may be CAPTCHAs. Imgur invites me to apply for a job,
>> given that I use the console ;)
>
>> I prefer using rand
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> Some detect that I'm doing console-level snapshot, and throw errors.
> Some of the errors may be CAPTCHAs. Imgur invites me to apply for a job,
> given that I use the console ;)
> I prefer using random exits with random timing, because that looks
On 06/11/2014 12:10 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Mirimir wrote:
Well, we can create a blacklist of sites that block Tor ;)
>>>
>> No. I just mean a list of sites that block Tor in some way.
>
> There's a wiki page for all this, and both of these forms...
>
>>> You
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>>> Well, we can create a blacklist of sites that block Tor ;)
>>
> No. I just mean a list of sites that block Tor in some way.
There's a wiki page for all this, and both of these forms...
>> You mean an exitpolicy blacklist of blocklists (list pro
On 06/11/2014 01:59 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> Well, we can create a blacklist of sites that block Tor ;)
>
> You mean an exitpolicy blacklist of blocklists (list providers),
> not of subscribing (or homegrown blocking) end sites.
No. I just mean a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> Well, we can create a blacklist of sites that block Tor ;)
You mean an exitpolicy blacklist of blocklists (list providers),
not of subscribing (or homegrown blocking) end sites.
Were it my exit, I'd just change all their images to cute little on
nonsense. If anyone is not using Tor, they should be.
>
> -- Christopher Booth
Well, we can create a blacklist of sites that block Tor ;)
> From: Andrew Lewman
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Sent:
> Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:06 PM Subject: Re: [tor-
ould be.
--
Christopher Booth
From: Andrew Lewman
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Norse Darklist, for blocking Tor
On 06/10/2014 06:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> """""
> http://www.nors
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> IPs are for routing, not reputation. Ugh.
It's doubly stupid because the "most dangerous" address would be one
that *isn't* on a public blacklist. And it's not even remotely
difficult to setup throwaway proxies to spam or send abuse.
I just really don't get the whole b
On 06/10/2014 04:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> "
> http://www.norse-corp.com/darklist.html
>
> The world's first comprehensive blacklist of the Internet's highest risk IPs.
>
> Traditional blacklists are often prone to false positives and are
> usually an aggregation of other lists, leading to inc
On 06/10/2014 06:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> "
> http://www.norse-corp.com/darklist.html
>
> The world's first comprehensive blacklist of the Internet's highest risk IPs.
IPs are for routing, not reputation. Ugh.
--
Andrew
pgp 0x6B4D6475
https://www.torproject.org/
+1-781-948-1982
--
tor-talk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/11/2014 1:46 AM, Michael Wolf wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 6:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>> " http://www.norse-corp.com/darklist.html
>>
>> The world's first comprehensive blacklist of the Internet's
>> highest risk IPs.
>
> "Why secure your server when
On 6/10/2014 6:17 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> "
> http://www.norse-corp.com/darklist.html
>
> The world's first comprehensive blacklist of the Internet's highest risk IPs.
"Why secure your server when you can pay us for a false sense of
security! Guaranteed to piss off potential customers and lowe
"
http://www.norse-corp.com/darklist.html
The world's first comprehensive blacklist of the Internet's highest risk IPs.
Traditional blacklists are often prone to false positives and are
usually an aggregation of other lists, leading to incomplete or poor
coverage. As a result, organizations r
14 matches
Mail list logo
