increased exponentially:
http://www.truthfulpolitics.com/images/us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg
Trillions are going somewhere, so whatever it is, it is big and they are
willing to undermine the financial health of the nation to deliver it.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sun,
ilitary project for the last decade or more???
It would seem to indicate that there is a Manhatten-style project underway.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 23:14:30 +
> From: simonsn...@openmailbox.org
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: [tor-talk] Que
Except that we know that such an attack is underway through PRISM and that no
one made any moves to fix it.
How long has it been now??? A year???
By any measure I am sure we can call that material assistance.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:55:18 -0400
> From
e basics of it. It needs fully fleshed out but to the end user
it would be a CPanel like interface and a standard website with DB support.
I'll see about expanding on this.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:00:59 -0400
> From: paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil
> To: tor-
d and what is being done about
it.
That will tell everyone what they need to know.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:26:04 -0400
> From: paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Sec
software, be it Tor or Freenet (etc), then quantify the information (data
points) available and what inferences can be made from them.
Then annoy the hell out of the developers until they eliminate each data point.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:18:40 -0300
> From
your reply are little more than Fud.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:36:08 -0400
> From: paul.syver...@nrl.navy.mil
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
> Anonymity
>
> On Tue, Ju
and hidden services,
whilst pretending to provide anonymity.
I don't see anyone denying it. Do you?
Its been 6 days already.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> From: fuersch...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:39:13 +0200
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [
Krishna,
Please. You are a PC repair guy who can install Linux.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 00:10:28 -0400
> From: k...@cyblings.on.ca
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
> Ano
ers without any
indication what happened."
Mark McCarron - June 25th
If he attempts to insinuate that I was accessing or attempting access illegal
material again, I will sue him.
He obviously has a problem, not with me, but the discussion about securing Tor
against intelligence agencies wi
Mick,
I would be very careful what you claim in your emails. I have the capability
of suing you into oblivion, that email constitutes defamation. Nothing like
that was ever said, either retract it or I will take you for everything that
you've got.
Your choice.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
nd-to-end traffic
analysis to protect hidden services. Certainly there are questions about Tor
and its devs, but the final implementation can be reviewed independently.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:45:12 +0200
> From: a.k...@gmx.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject
ut, no one makes any moves to correct the situation.
That pretty much tells everyone what they needed to know about Tor and its
developers.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 21:02:24 +1000
> From: z...@freedbms.net
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject:
oing somewhere and as its metadata, that implies traffic
analysis.
So, its a patchwork model and the costs are spread across many nations and
information sharing to isolate sites is policy driven.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:14:18 -0700
> From: coder...@gmai
statement is missing and why it was never implemented.
Just by asking those questions, we can better observe the intentions, or at
least make people squirm a little. :)
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:45:43 -0400
> From: mikew...@riseup.net
> To: tor-talk@lists.torpr
er to that in the future versions of Tor.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:54:03 -0400
> From: a...@mit.edu
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
> Anonymity
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014
was an unfortunate accident.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:41:55 +0100
From: m...@rlogin.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
Anonymity
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:11:18 +0100
Mark McCarron allegedly
mplex", keep in mind that I
am a security specialist too and know that to be untrue.
I don't mean to be confrontational in any way, but the credibility of this
project is on the line here.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 08:31:20 -0400
> From: a...@mit.edu
>
only assume that you're a sock
puppet for an intelligence agency who has started to panic about the network
going truly dark.
Deal with it.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:02:25 +1000
> From: z...@freedbms.net
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subje
to-end visibility is gone.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:19:00 -0300
> From: juan@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
> Anonymity
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:48:27 -0
modify it. That's a complex design, but robust
and the traffic analysis would yield little-to-no actionable information.
Does anyone have any other ideas?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:38:01 -0300
> From: juan@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
What other consistent factors are there?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
arrived or remained
even after the Freedom Hosting bust.
I think everyone needs to stop looking for excuses and start examining why this
is happening and fix it. Otherwise, this project is a waste of time.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:15:26 -0600
> From: miri...@rise
cage' that indicates the overall effectiveness of the Tor platform.
The canary is dead. Something is wrong with Tor and we need to find it.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:53:50 -0700
> From: coder...@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject:
Anonymous is an astro-turfed cover for the CIA.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:16:48 -0300
> From: juan@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of Tor Security and
> Anonymity
>
> On Wed,
best, at worst, non-existent.
Anyway, this is off-topic, so I won't be delving into this any further.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:36:06 -0400
> From: ape...@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metr
and Security of Tor?
The software is compromised in some fashion and we need to understand this.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:17:41 -0500
> From: joebtfs...@gmx.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Illegal Activity As A Metric of
been compromised on a global scale
with very little fanfare or moves to correct the situation.
Does anyone have any insights into the problem?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other
ng on here?
Mark McCarron
Lunar wrote:
>Joe Btfsplk:
>> I missed the memo on all reasons why Vidalia - bad, Tor Launcher -
>> good.
>
>At least:
>http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~clark/papers/2007_soups.pdf
>http://petsymposium.org/2012/papers/hotpets12-1-usability.pdf
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:40:11 +0100
> From: a.k...@gmx.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
>
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 13:17:47 +0000, Mark McCarron wrote:
> ...
> > > > In fac
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:22:27 +0100
> From: a.k...@gmx.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
>
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:25:02 +0000, Mark McCarron wrote:
> ...
> > In regards to ide
present and
provides no anonymity as it fails to deal with traffic analysis.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:23:08 -0800
> From: sch...@eff.org
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] !!! Important please read. !!!
>
> TheMindwareGroup writ
> Point by point.
>
> > Javascript, by itself, is not an issue and poses no more of a security
> > threat than any other type of data transferred online. Coding errors in
> > image handling, html parsing, ftp, etc., can all be used to inject code.
>
> Note that (potential) privilege escalatio
We're not discussing censorship, but the removal of potential exploitable data.
Its not a keyword system, it removes cookies, web bugs, adds jitter to
timings, etc. It can be disabled with a click.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:56:41 -0500
> From: and...@
connections.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:00:41 +0100
> From: a.k...@gmx.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Risk of selectively enabling JavaScript
>
> On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:58:49 +0000, Mark McCarron wrote:
> ...
> >
explicitly allow that by clicking a button.
That said, all of this is a complete waste of time if Tor does not start
integrating techniques to prevent traffic analysis.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 05:09:23 -0500
> From: mikewol...@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torpr
one else investigated this approach? If so, what were your results?
Regards,
Mark McCarron
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:57:56 -0300
> From: juan@gmail.com
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Android browser?
>
>
>
> --On Monday, December 09, 2013 1:11 AM + Mark McCarron
> wrote:
>
> >
Mark McCarron
Nathan Freitas wrote:
>On 12/07/2013 07:59 PM, Mark McCarron wrote:
>> I would be wary of Android. Its is complex to secure given the
>closed nature of most handsets.
>
>Do you have a mobile OS of choice that you feel is more trustworthy, or
>are you referr
have been designed to be accessible by governments is a
wise bet. It probably the real reason behind devices not providing root access
or the ability to do custom installs and the various laws to enforce that.
Mark McCarron
Original Message
From: Nathan Freitas
Sent: Sun Dec 08
n. So, this is about backdooring TOR, nothing
else.
That alone, at least to me, indicates that the IETF is pretty much NSA, or
representing their interests. I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw
them.
I vote no.
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:47:48 +0100
How about a certification program? A company can donate some funds to have
their product evaluated and if successful gain "TOR Certified" status. It
would stop all this nonsense and provide everyone the opportunity to request
specific features or amendments to designs.
I understand that no on
It will not be a fork. Anything I do will be submitted for inclusion in the
main branch when ready.
Quite a number of the changes I mentioned are in the pipeline anyway.
Mark McCarron
Original Message
From: Red Sonja
Sent: Tue Nov 19 19:07:31 GMT+00:00 2013
To: tor-talk
Regards,
Mark McCarron
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:01:58 +
> From: bm-2ctpedtadjx2bqf6wuux1cper78sq3x...@bitmessage.ch
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements
>
> Mark McCarron:
> > This will a
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:47:06 +0100
> From: t...@unterderbruecke.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/19/2013 06:50 AM, Mark McC
> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 21:11:40 +0100
> From: t...@unterderbruecke.de
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/18/2013 05:23 PM, Mark McCar
With all the recent crack downs on civil liberties, seizure of TOR services and
general censorship that is now hitting even mainstream search engines, I would
like to propose a set of new services and some enhancements to the network
layer to improve anonymity. We need to get as much support as
47 matches
Mail list logo
