grarpamp writes:
[...]
I could not follow these notations now, please wait!
> msmtp's complement, fetchmail, speaks of SOCKS in its
> docs, mentions a couple socks libs. But I've not tested
> fetchmail with them yet, it should be.
fetchmail leacks inesorably (?) dns requests also used through
grarpamp writes:
[...]
>>> And it requires managing
>>> a separate daemon for each account provider user wants to send mail to.
>>
>> You could use different ports with different smtp relays.
>> It is not easy but I did not find anything better.
>
> Hmm, I think that's the same meaning as runn
Il 22/05/2012 07:16, grarpamp ha scritto:
> socat -d -d -d -lu TCP4-LISTEN:2526,fork
> SOCKS4A:localhost:realsmtp.net:587,socksport=9050
> now what you need is to point your mua to localhost:2526 as smtp
> server. It works.
> Yes, but I'm pretty sure that would break TLS since msmtp sees localhost
grarpamp writes:
Sorry for delay!
Also in private mail for this delay.
or are you thinking of a shell script using socat?
>>> Socat does not provde a SOCKS server, only a client, so it can't
>>> be used. I mentioned it only as an example of an interesting shim-like
>>> tool that might be o
Il 06/05/2012 20:19, grarpamp ha scritto:
>> or are you thinking of a shell script using socat?
> Socat does not provde a SOCKS server, only a client, so it can't
> be used. I mentioned it only as an example of an interesting shim-like
> tool that might be out there. Not as one that could be used i
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:47:16PM +, James Brown wrote:
> Yes, indeed.
> But is it possible to use in with mutt and msmtp and etc.?
> I tried but msmtp don't want to work whith domains such *.onion.
I think you need also socat to use msmtp with a hidden service: try to
look at http://7vrjxq
