Nick Mathewson wrote on 2021-03-18:
> Changes in version 0.4.6.1-alpha - 2021-03-18
> Tor 0.4.6.1-alpha is the first alpha release in the 0.4.6.x series. It
> improves client circuit performance, adds missing features, and
> improves some of our DoS handling and statistics reporting. It als
Jonathan Marquardt wrote:
> https://netzpolitik.org/2017/geheime-dokumente-der-bnd-hat-das-anonymisierungs-netzwerk-tor-angegriffen-und-warnt-vor-dessen-nutzung/
> (German link)
>
> Netzpolitik.org (a german news blog focused on politics surrounding the
> digital world) today released a leak of
A couple of months ago I gave a German talk about accessing block
storage through one or more hidden services using ElectroBSD,
zogftw and (obviously) Tor.
The slides are available online now:
https://www.fabiankeil.de/talks/versteckter-block-speicher/
Most of the slides contain pictures, code or
Chris Dagdigian wrote:
> However I'm having issues getting it to operate. I keep seeing this as
> the last log entry:
>
> [warn] ConnLimit must be at least 32. Failing.
>
> .. despite setting ConnLimit to 1024 in torrc and testing the OS via
> "ulimit -H -n" I still see the "Failing" message
Tom Ritter wrote:
> On 5 May 2015 at 07:53, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Is the source of the PDF available under a free license?
> >
> > I'm currently preparing a (German) presentation about location
> > hidden block storage and could reuse the HS-related parts:
&
Tom Ritter wrote:
> I've put together a slide deck that aims to provide a 100-foot
> overview on little-t tor and Tor Browser. 100 foot, meaning I go into
> a lot of technical detail, but not 10 or 1 foot which means some
> things are definitely glossed over or handwaved a little. My
> consistenc
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> > The Privoxy part of the chain could be an issue. What is your
> > reason for using Privoxy?
> > In general, I find Tor to be faster overall, since overhauls in
> > TorBrowser - when they stopped using Priv
Wayland Morgan wrote:
> I have a shared host with as many as five users that will be logged in
> at a time, all to use Tor. In the current arrangement if one person is
> using Tor then no one else can bind to the local proxy port to forward
> their traffic out across the Tor network. The ultimate
Wayland Morgan wrote:
> Anyone know of a quick way that I can facilitate multiple concurrent Tor
> sessions from the same computer all with their own exit IP? I found a
> few how-to's using privoxy but this information seems to be a couple of
> years old and want to see if there is a more efficie
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> On May 2, 2014 6:34:25 PM EDT, intrigeri wrote:
> >Nathan Freitas wrote (02 May 2014 19:44:35 GMT) :
> >> We are also experimenting with a switch to Polipo
> >> (https://github.com/jech/polipo.git) from Privoxy.
> >
> >Jacob was strongly advocating that we do the exact o
Through the German Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat)
I'm involved with the organisation of a protest weekend against
mass surveillance on 2014-04-12 in Cologne, Germany:
http://cologne.stopwatchingus.info/demo-12-april/en.html
Obviously this would be a good opportunity for Tor advocacy,
Juan Garofalo wrote:
> --On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:24 PM +0200 Andreas Krey
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 05:52:07 +, Juan Garofalo wrote:
> > ...
> >>How is that 'pirate radio'? They had an actual RF transmitter that they
> >> accessed through a hidden service?
> >
> > O
Johnny Carson wrote:
> For those interested and close enough this rally to attend:
>
> https://rally.stopwatching.us/
And if Germany is closer to you: http://stopwatchingus.org/termine
We (AK Vorrat Köln-Bonn) will have a booth before and after the rally
in Cologne where we'll also talk to int
eliaz wrote:
> I'm writing to ask if there's been some network or server problem the
> last few days? I've run into a variety of error msgs & non-reproducible
> difficulties, and before I tear my system apart I want to be sure that's
> what I need to do. Details:
>
> All night the TBB hasn't b
Nam Su wrote:
> When I tried to verify signatures with GPA, gpg frontend, it was failed.
> I download Tor packages in torproject.org https version.
>
> Strangely, when I tried to verify with GPG command line, it was success.
Using gpg directly seems to be the recommended way:
https://www.torpr
Hendrik Neumann wrote:
> I've been running an exit node from my home network for ca. a year or
> so. Now I've receviced mail from 21st Century Fox's lawyers in Germany
> accusing me of torrenting a movie. Since all I offer via Torrent are
> some old PC-BSD-ISOs and "House on Haunted Hill", I'm pr
Asad Haider wrote:
> You can find the full interview and more information at
> http://raided4tor.cryto.net/
| I was handed the interrogation transcript, which I agreed to sign
| after reading it. I was free to go, but again they failed to inform
| me of something of critical importance – that I
Julian Yon wrote:
> This story has now hit Ars Technica:
> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/tor-operator-charged-for-child-porn-transmitted-over-his-servers/
There doesn't seem to be any indication that he has been
charged with anything.
Usually raids happen to collect evidence that m
jiang song wrote:
> but with tor, my understanding and questions are:
>
>DNS query :C -> TOR network -> exit node
> -> DNS server
>DNS response:DNS server -> exit node
> --
Rejo Zenger wrote:
> On 8 okt. 2012, at 13:13, and...@torproject.is wrote:
> > Can they share the data about 'cyber-attacks' and why Tor is chosen as
> > a technology to be blocked? I'm interested in learning the details of
> > quantity and quality of attacks via Tor against the Europa infrastruc
adrelanos wrote:
> Abel Luck:
> > Given the following conditions:
> >
> > 1) Firefox (15.0 lets say) is running in an isolated VM, and only
> > Firefox is running (i.e., no other user apps)
>
> Bad. You'd be one of the very few people not using TBB. There are much
> more TBB users than Mozilla
There's an upcoming bar camp in Brussels (2012-09-14 - 2012-09-17) that
is relevant to our interests, but doesn't seem to be on the calendar yet:
http://www.freedomnotfear.org/
https://wiki.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/Freedom_Not_Fear_2012
It's likely to be attended by a fair number of non-technica
wrote:
> freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
> > wrote:
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > That's incorrect. Privoxy can change the forwarding settings based
> > on
> > > > tags:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/actions-file.html#CLIENT-HEADER-TAGGER
> >
> > >
> > > Excuse me, if I misu
wrote:
> wrote:
> > That's incorrect. Privoxy can change the forwarding settings based on
> > tags:
> >
> > http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/actions-file.html#CLIENT-HEADER-TAGGER
>
> Excuse me, if I misunderstood. It doesn't look like anyone done that
> ever before (and documented that onlin
wrote:
> Many applications, such as wget, apt-get, gpg, etc. do not speak socks,
> are unlikely to speak socks anytime soon, but support http.
>
> Privoxy or polipo are of no help. They provides only one http port, with
> the one big drawback: all http connections will be presses through the
> s
Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 2012-03-02, Andrew Lewman wrote:
>
> > The trick is, I like to think I know what I'm doing and that I'll
> > notice if apt-get or my VM image fails to transfer untouched. Whether
> > I'll actually notice a sophisticated exploit in deb packages or my vm
> > image modifi
Gijs wrote:
> Why not run something like "redsocks" (first hit on transparent socks)
> http://darkk.net.ru/redsocks/ on VM1 ? It is a program that sits in between
> the proxy and client. You then configure the firewall running on VM1 to
> redirect traffic only through redsocks and allow no other
Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> was playing w/ latest TBB & seeing how other apps (like email - Tbird,
> or other apps) behaved, just to experiment.
>
> 1) Question about changes in proxy settings of late(er) TBB (Aurora - FF
> 6) use. Notice that ONLY things filled in on network > settings page is:
> -
Martin Fick wrote:
> --- On Wed, 8/31/11, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Martin Fick
> > wrote:
> >
> > > --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Matthew
> > wrote:
> > > > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/08/why-ip-addresses-alone-dont-identify-criminals
>
Martin Fick wrote:
> --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Matthew wrote:
> > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/08/why-ip-addresses-alone-dont-identify-criminals
> >
> >
> > If you run an exit relay, consider operating it in a
> > Tor-friendly commercial facility instead of your home
> > to make it less
cmeclax-sazri wrote:
> Is it possible to specify in Privoxy or Polipo that a particular website
> will be accessed through an exit in a particular country, while all
> other websites will be accessed through a randomly chosen exit anywhere?
It's possible if you enable the AllowDotExit option, bu
Tomas Touceda wrote:
> On 13:15 Fri 13 May , Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Tomas Touceda wrote:
> >
> > > Vidalia-0.3.0-alpha is out!
> > > We are going to be doing a series of alpha releases in parallel with the
> > > stable 0.2.x to have a wider
Tomas Touceda wrote:
> Vidalia-0.3.0-alpha is out!
> We are going to be doing a series of alpha releases in parallel with the
> stable 0.2.x to have a wider audience for some changes that are kind of
> "core" for Vidalia, or they are really big to put them on the stable
> before testing them for
"Karsten N." wrote:
> Am 02.03.2011 19:28, schrieb morphium:
> > please move server4you (on this page:
> > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TheOnionRouter/GoodBadISPs)
> > from the good to the bad providers.
> I can recommed non-German ISPs like Leaseweb.nl or coolhousing.net (CS)
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
