f a malicious user has access to your computer and your
user account, you're lost anyway.
Best regards
Christian
--
|- Dr. Christian Siefkes - christ...@siefkes.net -
| Homepage: https://www.siefkes.net | Blog: https://keimform.de
| Berlin klimapositi
ever, I
> just can't encourage more of the behavior I've seen so far.
How about not looking then? As others already said, looking at exit node
traffic is probably illegal and certainly immoral. If you don't want grief,
at least just don't cause any yourself.
Best regards
, they should use the
noindex meta tag: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noindex . robots.txt is only
for crawlers that automatically follow links from one page to others.
Neither standard prevents or discourages manually setting a link to the page.
Best regards
Christian
--
|---
modified version, and that's what happened. It certainly
proves that you shouldn't download software from untrusted sources (neither
the Tor Project nor Mozilla was involved) and that you should verify the
signatures of the software to use. None of that is news, of course.
Best regar
However, I'd like to see baseline research
> and
> then settings changes that are proven to improve anonymity for the user. Of
> course, 'improve anonymity' implies some sort of measurement, which ties into
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/research-problem-measuring-s
On 11/04/2011 06:01 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 11/4/2011 9:54 AM, Christian Siefkes wrote:
>> How should using Google as search engine comprise your anonymity? Either
>> you're anonymous, then you're anonymous on Google too. Or you aren't
>> anonymous,
ngine comprise your anonymity? Either
you're anonymous, then you're anonymous on Google too. Or you aren't
anonymous, then avoiding Google won't help you.
Best regards
Christian
--
|--- Dr. Christian Siefkes --- christ...@siefkes.net ---
| Homepage: ht
