Am 09.08.2016 um 18:32 schrieb Green Dream:
> So yeah... I think you're out of luck.
Let them block your exit, if they are consequent and block all tor they
get what they want. I guess.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torpro
be another exit node. That is the
short version, I always provide the same explanation.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
#x27;re reading the list as well but only
as a digest, so replys look odd.
They are happy to give guidance, also if people do not have the money to
run relays/exits they are happy about admins supporting them by donating
some time.
They are also on Twitter https://twitter.com/artikel5ev
Thanks
yl
people that would be able to run a Tor relay on
their idle home server or on some raspberry pi, so it might be a good
way to reach new people.
Regards
yl
On 13.12.2017 22:46, Artikel 5 e.V. wrote:
> Hello,
> when I looked around in the wiki for this years Chaos Communication
> Co
what is the downside there? Just wondering if for that usecase,
SSH to login remotely on to the relay would still have any disadvantages
that I missed to consider.
Thanks.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.to
a week then prepare some text modules that you just copy
an paste, make it look unique and many people will understand.
Yours,
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
and Jacob next Winter in Hamburg.
Greetings
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
port publicly. What are the reasons
not to do so?
Thanks
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Am 24.03.2015 um 23:16 schrieb Josef Stautner:
> you can do it if you want. But the traffic between you and the server is
> unencrypted.
> I think that's the main reason.
Thanks for the answer, it is obvious, just didn't consider that part of
the connection. Thanks
with the
AES-NI being one part of the bottleneck?
Thanks
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ive such
complaints, but you might want to check with your hoster to ignore some
of them, they usually understand what tor is and also understand that
complaints are not caused by you.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://
feasible.
I run a tor relay on some Atom processor, the bottleneck is the missing
AES-NI I think, however on 100MBit/s it only makes 35MBit/s with one CPU
core being loaded 100% and the other 3 at ~10%. My relay makes a few
TB/month like that, so I guess it is st
re there plans to
> include a button into torbrowser to enable/disable ipv6?
Not sure where the a should be put, so maybe someone can just past a
sample config with the IPv6 enabled, I think from that we can substitute
easily.
One question also, is this for relay servers or ON
ked it might be good to block these ports if
reasonable. Also contacting the complaining party might be a good idea
in some cases.
greetings
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
where access to the
Internet is restricted. For more information please see
https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html#overview
//End
However, the main thing I wanted to pass on is that standard text I use,
feel free, copy and use it.
greetings
yl
Am 15.09.2015 um 21:42 schrieb spiro
don't for the Tor network?
Let me know your thoughts. The services URL is https://www.webiron.com,
don't need to go there, I didn't because such services are just useless.
Better use fail2ban or something similar.
Greeting
yl
___
tor-relay
Am 17.04.2016 um 18:29 schrieb Vasilis:
> Check your mailing list subscription here:
> (https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays)
>
>
> Hope this helps!
Probably not, if the person does not receive the email. ;-)
BR
yl
Hello Toralf
Depending on the OS it is called arm or nyx.
I can check the log output of tor itself, I think that is the source of the nyx
messages in the initial screen.
Regards
yl
Am 7. Januar 2020 19:12:46 MEZ schrieb "Toralf Förster"
:
>On 1/7/20 6:36 PM, ylms wrote:
>&
U power,
but I'd say something with a bit more power should be able to take
12MByte/s.
Regards
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
what I do all the time for several Exits.
Regards
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
still in the error state.
I am very thankful for help.
Regards
yl
On 08/04/2020 10:53, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 09:40:39AM +0200, ylms wrote:
>> So I see some info there, but nothing helpful since I just activated
>> logging yesterday. I will revisit this in
Pv6 connectivity
fails, it is just a PING6, but it'll do the job.
Then when this happens I will check my system logs.
Regards
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I have this issue for some weeks, maybe since the late summer. I do not
restart the Exit that often, so just 3 restarts due to some updates of
Debian.
Any idea how to troubleshoot this and what to look for?
Thanks
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor
Thanks, will check further.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
"TimeoutStartSec=300" that should work well.
I am sure there is nicer solutions, but why bother.
yours
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ere is so many
IPv6 resources that a IPv6 only Exit should still be fine.
Thanks
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
don't want to allow (reject) all
exit to IPv4 and guess that muss be possible somehow?
Regards
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
;m not happy with it, but it's better than being discredited by ISPs.
E-Mail is banned, I think the reason for my problems was forum spam, so
some spam done via 80/443.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lis
ore that in the
standard doc. online.
I will try what happens if I apply a config with IPv6 exit only, I guess
it could work now.
At least I need to close 80/443, as that seems to be the source for
spam, I assume it is some webform or forum spam that got the server
listed in the spam b
On 2/19/22 00:06, nusenu wrote:
You can run a relay that does allow exiting to IPv6 and not IPv4 but it
will
not get the exit flag.
Which means what? Will it be use for exit at all?
Would be sad to loose this 300MBit/s fully used Exit.
yl
Hello Neel,
I found in the past year, that these Spam abuse complaints are about
Spam sent via some webmailer, so someone uses port 80/443 and then sent
spam via a email providers website. Very strange they even report this
as spam.
Regards
yl
On 5/3/22 20:42, Neel Chauhan wrote:
Hi,
A
On 5/4/22 14:31, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
It's actually very unlikely that a longer running exit can send mails.;-)
I can't even send myself log mails from my exit IP's because all IP's are
blacklisted. On abusix.com and similar.
I wonder if you could use msmtp to replace sendmail and th
I am just a beginner to Absible, so I will not be of any help there, but
there is also some playbooks and roles for bridges here:
https://github.com/alxndr42/
Regards
yl
On 4/20/22 19:54, Toralf Förster wrote:
I do appreciate those for my attempt here:
https://github.com/toralf/tor-relays
stribution/
I think this line can be removed from your torrc "BridgeDistribution
any", I guess then it defaults to something, I assume to https.
Is that correct?
Regards
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lis
ons all the time, so it is used.
yl
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
35 matches
Mail list logo