+1 incoming.
On Tuesday, February 27th, 2024 at 04:17,
tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org
wrote:
>
>
> Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.t
> On 27 Feb 2024, at 15:39, boldsuck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 27. Februar 2024 14:52:00 CET Corl3ss via tor-relays wrote:
>> On 26/02/2024 21:03, Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
>>> On 2/26/24 20:07, meskio wrote:
>>>> At the moment we're
>>
e relevant enough to immediately effectuate. Sometimes
they can go ~60 days without needing a Tor restart.
But your mileage may vary. For example some operators compile Tor daily and
then a restart may be required more often. I do feel something is wrong in your
configuration though. Tor cer
Greetings,
I do not normally use mailing lists such as this one to inform subscribers of
security notices, but this issue is extreme enough where it may benefit the
anonymity of Tor users if relay operators are aware of it sooner.
The near-universally used 'xz' compression librar
On Freitag, 29. März 2024 19:39:05 CEST pasture_clubbed242--- via tor-relays
wrote:
>
> The near-universally used 'xz' compression library has been found to contain
> a backdoor in certain code branches. This backdoor has made it into some
> systems such as Debian Sid.
This would help us to add some more meaning to that metric again:
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40934
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hello,
today we saw yet another outbound flooding affecting our exit relays
and we were eager to see the effect of
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40736
but we did not see any
and according to metric
tor_relay_dos_total{type="stream_rejected"}
the protection did n
According to the logs this feature is currently disabled.
We will enable this protection on our exits via torrc settings.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
orship/rdsys/-/issues/199
>
> It should be solved now.
>
> Talk soon,
>
> -hiro
>
> On 4/22/24 22:13, Hiro wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > On 4/20/24 17:40, Dionysios K. via tor-relays wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> I recently
Hello,
is the upstream C tor client implementation (in git main) aware of the
DoSStreamCreation consensus parameters and defaults thresholds and
respects them to avoid triggering these exit relay defenses?
If that is currently not the case yet, would it make sense to make it
aware so it
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi,
re. # Questions & Answers * Q: zimmer family hitting max descriptor size
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/tor/-/issues/40837 Any news on a
possible solution to this ongoing issue?
tl;dr: more powerful relays rather than large numbers of them.
*Please note I have very little
For several weeks now, users have been complaining (see
https://www.reddit.com/r/TOR/comments/1cnmsdz/tor_extremely_slow_lately/,
https://forum.torproject.org/t/is-there-currently-a-major-ddos-affecting-the-networks-availability/12492,
etc) about degraded performance (slow speeds, timeouts
Greetings everyone!
Almost three months ago I have set up my first node. Everything seemed to be
going great at first and as documented in the tor lifecycle blog post.
A few days after being set up the weight drastically dropped to around twenty.
This seemed a bit odd since that same blog post
start from scratch?
--
Eldalië
My private key is attached. Please, use it and provide me yours!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
date. The issue is severe for me though, so any help in
fixing the bandwidth limit again would be really appreciated.
--
Sent with Tuta; enjoy secure & ad-free emails:
https://tuta.com
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
list of things my friend who
I work with and I have done over the past week:
Checked tor logs, hoping to find some error that told me that something was
wrong with my tor setup (nothing was found!)
Checked zabbix metrics, but nothing out of the ordinary (also worth to mention
that this was setup
Since you created the instance using 'tor-instance-create', here’s an extract
from its manpage:
There currently is no tor-instance-remove script. To remove an instance, delete
the user and its homedirectory once you are convinced there are no files or
processes on your system stil
case someone else reads this thread:
https://blog.torproject.org/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay/
--
Eldalië
My public key is attached. Please, use it and provide me yours!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relay
network?
I'll await your answers
Thanks for the input
SDS_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ys Guard status would randomly drop every few weeks.
I finally got fed up with this huge drop in traffic on 2024-06-11 and was about
to reinstall my server OS. This is when I decided to disable UFW and found that
my traffic went back over a few days (2.215M -> 8.948M).
Here are my tor-relate
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi Likogan,
> What UFW rules do other relay operators enact?
I'm running 4CEAFCE5841C0DAE30164B4F59452F7F4D818A67 on Linux Mint 21.3 (should
be close to Ubuntu Jammy) with UFW enabled, and don't have any issues. I have
the same two rules for Tor as you do. I can imagine three thin
Top-post reminder about tomorrow.
On 6/12/24 16:34, gus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please save the date: the next Tor Relay Operator will happen Saturday,
> June 22 at 19 UTC!
>
> We're still working on the agenda for this meetup, however feel free to
> add your topics di
Hi o/,
During the Tor Operator Meetup I asked about Quick Assist Technology (QAT)
support and was asked to bring it to the tor-relays mailing list so the network
team can take a look at the question.
In 2025 we're going to build one or more new servers and we're looking in to
opti
Hi,
Thanks for your reply Alex! That mailing list thread is great and contains
quite some relevant pointers.
Some of my current Tor hardware (Intel C3958) is actually QAT compatible (it's
the one mentioned even) so based on the information in the thread I activated
to experiment:
- Kerne
Some of my current Tor hardware (Intel C3958) is actually QAT compatible (it's
the one mentioned even)Just for the record, Intel makes QAT PCIe adapter cards
[1], so one can benefit from it even if the CPU is older and doesn’t directly
support QAT.They are not cheap but one can find the
For what it's worth, in addition to my Tor Bridge Relay, I also run two
Snowflake Proxies on my home LAN.
Malcolm
On 6 July 2024 19:14:23 GMT-03:00, "Gary C. New via tor-relays"
wrote:
>Alessandro,
>
>I would recommend running bridges (opposed to relays) on a home ne
Hi,
Imo mobile chips with mostly low-performance 'efficient cores' are a suboptimal
fit for running Tor at scale. A couple of reasons:
- Performance between the different core types (efficient vs. performance) is
very different. You would need to lock Tor processes to specific
I have had two ubuntu based tor middle relays fail.I am using a proxmox
server and have tried both ubuntu server 20.04 and a fresh download of
ubuntu 24.04. I follow the tor website install instructions. The results
show the same no matter what version of ubuntu. "failed to start
Since it is still all fresh in our heads, I wanted to pitch an idea real fast.
No idea if it was covered at a tor meeting at some point.
For bridge relay operators, such as those with very low bandwidth, it may be
worth it to keep lower-than-consensus-restrictions using the DOS flags here
Hi Landon,
Aarch64 is a supported architecture for tor, although it appears there
isn't a buildbot for binaries.
It'll be easiest to just compile from source, which I'll help you with.
First you install dependencies and fine GNU software
(I'm guessing some of the depende
Dear fellow relay operators,
I've been hosting a tor relay on a VPS (strato) for a couple days now. I've
never done this before, so I have a couple of questions:
- Is it normal for my relay to only use up only about 2 MB/s after nearly 5
days of uptime despite bandwidth speed tests
with their own headaches/challenges vs.
guard relays.
This is normal as well. I don't know speedtest-cli specifically, but I imagine
it's a regular tcp/udp speedtest while Tor traffic is more likely to be CPU
limited instead of network throughput limited. Just pushing some udp/tcp
traffic
don wrote:
> TL;DR...
> Write down your Tor server's GATEWAY IP address. if your server goes offline,
> try tracerouting to your Tor server's gateway IP address as well as your Tor
> server's IP address! You might be surprised by what you see!
>
> And also install M
Hello,
Yes it's very normal. After 2 weeks you will see the speed increasing. You can
read here about the lifecycle of a new relay
https://blog.torproject.org/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay/
Kind regards,
Tzanca
On Monday, August 19th, 2024 at 9:01 PM, observatory123 via tor-relays
wrote:
&
On Dienstag, 20. August 2024 12:12:22 CEST Tzanca via tor-relays wrote:
> > I bet the reason that my server periodically goes offline is because it is
> > being blocked and not because it is actually offline!
>
> It can be the metrics server seeing server down but server actuall
On Sonntag, 14. Juli 2024 15:54:45 CEST Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
> On 7/12/24 00:14, boldsuck wrote:
> > The idea is not bad. But can you simply discard every ≤ 50byte packet?
>
> Probably not
>
> > I drop fragments and uncommon TCP MSS values.
> > ip
F to strict
adkim=s; aspf=s;
and DMARC subdomain policy to reject
sp=reject;
Since then, emails about Tor-exits have dropped to 0
;-)
--
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!
Debian GNU/Linux
It's free software and it gives you freedom!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
On Donnerstag, 8. August 2024 22:20:35 CEST eff_03675...@posteo.se wrote:
> Hi Rafo,
>
> My apologies for the late reply in your request for the code on banning
> tor exits into *GUARDS or middle-relays*
Before many people copy this, a note:
A relay with exit flag is MOSTLY used for
q
I've been using it for a few months.
Decentralized, no ID, protected metadata, multiple user profiles, some designs
taken from the Tor protocol. All SimpleX servers optionally accessible via Tor
and you can run your own private SimpleX server.
Jack Dorsey invested a large sum in further
On Montag, 26. August 2024 17:33:22 CEST Marco Predicatori wrote:
> All this is pretty scary. Pretty much any exit node manager can be arrested
> on the very same basis.
No.
A Tor router does not host any data, it is a router like any other ISP or
backbone router.
I am currently updati
ine too. Also be sure to learn
> about 'BandwidthBurst' in case its behavior is surprising to you.
>
If a bridge reaches 20-30 MBytes, that's already a lot. There are only very
few (guard|exit) relays on Tor-Metrics that reach 100 MBytes.
> Should an anti DDoS system be configu
On Mittwoch, 28. August 2024 07:53:21 CEST Alessandro Greco via tor-relays
wrote:
> > Once your bridge has been running stable for a few weeks, an advanced but
> > experimental feature is to hide OrPort.
>
> So is it possible to remove the ports from the torrc file while keepin
Hi Landon,
>but keeping it up to date is not easy.
>Plus, I don't really know how to keep it up to date like that.
You check for a tor update every month or three, download the latest
archive, compile and install that and as soon as you restart tor, it'll
be up to date.
It bein
On Freitag, 30. August 2024 14:35:26 CEST Alessandro Greco via tor-relays
wrote:
> I noticed that you have a lot of Bridges active and in this regard I wanted
I have different subnets on the servers and each bridge has a different IP+IPv6.
Until 3 years ago you could get 1 IP for less tha
On Montag, 2. September 2024 14:54:55 CEST gus wrote:
Hello Alex,
First of all, it's nice that you're on the list.
Maybe you would like to listen in on the meeting on Saturday.
(It's anonymous and without a webcam)
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2024-August/02
.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Montag, 2. September 2024 19:01:16 CEST code9n via tor-relays wrote:
> I know I should have sorted this some weeks ago but can anyone tell me a
> simple method of dealing with the:
As root, one line:
wget -qO-
https://deb.torproject.org/torproje
On Freitag, 6. September 2024 08:47:14 CEST eff_03675...@posteo.se wrote:
OK,
looks like TorProject (Gus) renamed the key and resolved
tor-archive-keyring.gpg vs. deb.torproject.org-keyring.gpg mismatch.
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/web/support/-/issues/368
Then I can update my sources
On Donnerstag, 5. September 2024 19:53:00 CEST gus wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder that we're meeting this Saturday,
> September 7th @ 1900 UTC.
>
> Meeting pad: https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-relayop-sept7th-meetup-keep
> Room link: https://tor.meet.coop/gus-og0-x74-dzn
&g
--
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!
Debian GNU/Linux
It's free software and it gives you freedom!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mai
Am Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:14:56 -0300
schrieb gus :
> > > https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-relayop-sept7th-meetup-keep Room
>
> Gus
Hi Gus
During reading through the pad I think I unfortunately deleted the link
under "4. New Relay Governance docs" when I clicked the link on
.
I am running Tor 4.8.12 installed from the official Tor repositories in Ubuntu
22.04 with OR port 9001. The entire network is an EdgeRouter plugged into WAN
and then a firewall rule letting traffic hit the host for Tor. The relay is
indeed working, but everyday it seems that less and less
On Montag, 16. September 2024 12:31:24 CEST isabela fernandes wrote:
> On September 9, 2024, The Tor Project received a press inquiry from
> Norddeutscher Rundfunk (NDR, part of ARD, a German public broadcaster) with
> The reporter claims to have "evidence that shows that in
On Montag, 16. September 2024 22:03:02 CEST Toralf Förster via tor-relays wrote:
> On 9/16/24 21:13, boldsuck via tor-relays wrote:
> > Some court documents are linked here, in the google sheets:
> > https://safereddit.com/r/TOR/comments/19benkx/operation_liberty_lane_le_ru
>
Greetings Marco,
Something I always found confusing is what the difference is between the
Vanguards Github project, and the version of Vanguards that Tor has
implemented. I thought Vanguards was added into Tor no? Is the Vanguards
project still useful despite this?
I'm not sure if this
Hello.
I am very new tor operator. For now i have only two relays.
And one of them show wrong country in METRICS. I run in Estonia, but it shown
as Germany. The same AS has another two relays, both in Estonia.
IP-lookup shows Estonia.
How change contry in METRICS?
Thank you.
publickey - tor
ok. understand.
but can i change VPS to another and leave me old keys? to change country
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, August 7, 2020 9:38 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> - tor-operator-sahara...@protonmail.com:
>
> > How chan
/rs.html#details/AC5CECEF6AF649F2A7F047D102FE9B461DA9234E
They havnt exit-flag. Why it happen?
publickey - tor-operator-sahara-it@protonmail.com - 0x4B4FD460.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor
yes yes understand. thank you
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 10, 2020 2:12 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:55 AM tor-operator-sahara-it
> tor-operator-sahara...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hell
i was choose vps for tor node special in small country with small quantity tor
nodes. and METRICS put my node in Germany ))) where are already a lot of relays.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 10, 2020 1:56 PM, Sebastian Elisa Pfeifer
yes, you are right. ok. i ignore it .
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:57 PM, Ralph Seichter
wrote:
> - tor-operator-sahara...@protonmail.com:
>
> > i was choose vps for tor node special in small countr
(more expensive) plan...
Some time later I did so and reinstalled it with Ubuntu 18.04 and placed
the old keys into the new installation. It seems they are now expected
to be in /var/lib/tor/.tor/keys, as opposed to /var/lib/tor/keys as I
was used to in Ubuntu 16.04.
However, it does not seem to be
changed. It still isn't in the consensus.
If it is caused by something on my side, I'd like to fix it sooner
rather than later.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
he free
software movement for many many years.
My 2 modest guard/mid relays will keep running independent of this
embarrassing issue.
___________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Happens on all internet-facing ssh daemons.
Independently of tor.
On 3/31/21 6:35 PM, Cristiano Kubiaki Gomes wrote:
> Hi there,
> O noticed many ssh requests to my Debian VM running a Relay and I am
> wondering if this is normal or if this is happening only with me.
>
> Anyone el
Exit relays have nothing to do with .onion sites.
By design you cannot block them in your relay.
On 5/27/21 6:43 PM, Tor Operator wrote:
> Hello, exit node operator here. I share the values of the TOR
> foundation, that’s why I’m operating an exit node but I can’t unsee all
> the bad i
know if it matters what pool a bridge is in.
TIA,
--Torix
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email._______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
here.
TIA,
--Torix_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
pt is being run over and over again for 2 weeks instead of just
once. And yes, one of my relays fell over with a kernel limits problem two
nights ago.
--Torix
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 30th, 2021 at 7:15 AM, Georg Koppen
wrote:
> torix via tor-relays:
>
> &g
Hi all!
I've been running two tor relays [1] on the same machine for the past three
weeks or so on my home connection (1 gigabit fibre).
When I was looking for appropriate hardware (I needed something fanless) I was
surprised at the almost complete absense of information online about what
rease in advertised
bandwidth starting Thursday seems so strange.
--Torix
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, September 1st, 2021 at 6:06 AM, Georg Koppen
wrote:
> torix via tor-relays:
>
> > Thanks for setting my mind at ease, Geor
.github.io/OrNetStats/endtoend-correlation-groups
)
--Torix
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, September 2nd, 2021 at 7:51 AM, Georg Koppen
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> torix via tor-relays:
>
> > Dear Georg,
> >
> > I don't understand that a ddos attac
In torrc I have the control port commented out. I'm told the control port is
not supposed to
be listed on the relay itself. Below, is now what it says. How do I get rid of
it?
Control Socket: /run/tor/control GroupWritable RelaxDirModeCheck
Thank you for your help :-)
Sent with [Proto
iOS___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Dear All,
I can see in OrNetStats that I have several relays marked as having a
vulnerable Tor version. But when I checked and tried to update them, I was told
that everything was up to date. In 2 cases relays rented at the same time on
the same host have different versions.
AlexHost running
Thanks very much, Nusenu - I was sometimes copying a bad configuration file
from one to another FreeBSD relays; Tor versions are all good now. I won't
worry why one of my relays with the EPEL 8 repo got me 0.4.6.7 while the other
two are at 0.4.5.10 since 5.10 is good enough.
--
support article to find out how you can recover to a "normal" state:
>
> https://support.torproject.org/relay-operators/relay-bridge-overloaded/
>
> Let us known how you find this new feature.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -hiro
>
> [1]
>
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/to
The output format is Prometheus but you don't need a prometheus server to
> > > get
> > >
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Once opened, you can simply fetch it like this:
> > >
> > > wget http://:/metrics -O /tmp/output.txt
> > >
>
Tor has always been very lax at documentation--both creation and updating.
I've never seen a thorough site map or directory published. I think this
discourages folks who would like to start a tor relay.
potlatch
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tu
Has anyone else on this list had issues with compiled versions of
0.4.6.7 in which the --enable-libnss is enabled?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
/) Secure Email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
configure tor (via the torrc file) to restart
automatically once a month? Thank you.
--Keifer
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 10/16/21 5:56 PM, Bass Down Low via tor-relays wrote:
Hi all,
I am somewhat new to the project and trying to run a couple exits to
help out. I noticed my relay amazinglizard
F80494CE5B2441B67431FFA9CCA571D26BC4F6D8 has bee up for 4 days and not
turned into an exit yet. I noticed the
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
;
Discourse was contacted, and as it looks right now, we are not getting
an onion service.
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/tpa/team/-/issues/40183#note_2740700
I looked around a little, but I can't find where there is anything on
exactly why it isn't self hosted.
--
HackerNCo
I was notified by Uptime Robot that relay 1 of 3 had been shut down.
Unfortunately I found this out 12 hours after the fact.
guard flag is lost.
journalctl -u tor@default
Nov 01 01:03:18 ubuntu-s-1vcpu-2gb-nyc1-01 Tor[328387]: I learned some more
directory information, but not enough to build
Wondering if my tor.list has a typo since I can't upgrade Tor 0.4.5.9. I get
error:
Err:1 https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org stretch/main amd64 tor-geoipdb
all 0.4.5.10-1~d9.stretch+1
server certificate verification failed. CAfile:
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt CRLfile: n
Hi everyone,
about two weeks ago, I signed up for a VPS with a cloud provider and set up a
Tor relay. I installed Debian 11 Bullseye, secured it, and then set up Tor
0.4.6.8 and started the relay.
The VPS had the following specs: 1vCore, 2GB RAM, 40TB traffic per month on a
1Gbit/s link. I
help!
Best Regards...
_______
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I just read this research paper, maybe it's worth thinking about some kind of
implementation of this approach some time in the future.
It's an interesting read anyway.
uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/16108/Engler_Steven.pdf
Regards
_____
instructions would be much
appreciated.
Kindly,
Dan
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
crashed all the time, but all that happened was that my 20TB SSD was
maxed out within two hours and I had to reboot to get rid of the old logfiles.
My bad, please don't think I write a debug log, that's completely pointless.
Why would I. I rented a pretty expensive root server becau
Does the provider offer IPv6? If not, then there is no further progress
possible. If they do, this is pretty accurate to get started,
https://www.vultr.com/docs/configuring-ipv6-on-freebsd Jonas --
Original Message --On Wed, November 10, 2021 at 12:40 AM, xplato via
tor-relays
Where is this criteria documented?
It seems the tor project, or its designated volunteers, are increasing
controlling and managing the network. In the Swiss Federation and EU this turns
the tor project into an "online service provider" or "online platform" and
subjects
s
are watching the discussion there. However, as they are the ones who are
most affected by the proposal it's smart to find a better place for
discussing its ideas. Hence this thread on tor-relays@.
---response starts here---
As a bridge operator, I stopped the plan on running relays due to th
which
I'd stay away from, however, seeing the time, effort and care people from
the tor project and people like nusenu seem to invest, I don't think your
statement is appropriate.
Even if there are other attack vectors, it seems to have been shown that
malicious relays are in fact used fo
Hello,
Does the new Tor web configuration have an overall site map or index page? I
can't find the old page with the manual for torrc. I've had trouble finding
other information over the past few weeks as well.
Thanks,
potlatch
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
publickey
etered and it's a guaranteed 1GHz link. I
don't think I will ever be able to relay 125MB/s, but I will try my best. If I
can only reach ~50MB/s before the CPU starts to grumble I will set up a second
Tor process and a second relay.
I tuned my relay a bit today, using some of the ti
701 - 800 of 1440 matches
Mail list logo
