Re: [tor-relays] All I want for Chrismas is a bloody t-shirt

Are there any “special” t-shirts for the 1%? markus > > Hi, > > Jon is distributing t-shirts and Christmas cheer this year. > > Have you been naughty or nice? > > And by the way, it's SanTor, not SanTOR (or SANTOR). > (And our trademark lawyers prefer onion jokes.) > > :-) > > T > > --

Re: [tor-relays] Network scan results for CVE-2016-5696 / RFC5961

4 server rebooted, thank you very much. markus > On 9 Dec 2016, at 06:31, Ivan Markin wrote: > > Hi tor-relays@, > > Getting back with more results on this. > I've implemented CVE-2016-5696 scanner in Go [1] and scanned the Tor > network several times [2]. > First results I've got using tech

Re: [tor-relays] Network scan results for CVE-2016-5696 / RFC5961

Playing devils advocate here. People want the T-Shirts. Its free advertisement for Tor. Perhaps it would be great if people could get T-Shirts in exchange for other goods. Like this: http://i.imgur.com/9Y8p7.gif A long time ago this was possible: https://www.tors

Re: [tor-relays] Cloning a relay - duplicate fingerprint

rm -rv keys/ new keys -> new fingerprint -> new identity > On 17 Dec 2016, at 17:30, Patrick DERWAEL wrote: > > Hi list, > > I'm running a relay on a CentOS VM > > As I have lots of resources available, I wanted to duplicate that VM to bring > more bandwidth to the Tor network > --> clone

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

Yes, running 12 exits there. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/28F4F392F8F19E3FBDE09616D9DB8143A1E2DDD3 the atom cpu suxx, install 2 instance, so you get around 100-120 mbit. Markus > On 20 Dec 2016, at 14:4

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

in my experience long time ago … arm suxx. I would switch to the 2 core atom, they suck too but no so bad as the arm there. Markus > On 20 Dec 2016, at 14:24, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists > wrote: > > Hello, > > i'm experimenting Tor setup on very cheap servers from scaleaway.com > that

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay on ARM server Marvell Armada 370/XP

Whoops, wrong one :/ https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/24E91955D969AEA1D80413C64FE106FAE7FD2EA9 > On 20 Dec 2016, at 18:28, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:19:06 +0100 > niftybunny wrote: > >> Yes, running 12 exits there. >> >> http

Re: [tor-relays] Some problems with new Exit Node

Yes. Even with your own name server this will happen. You will get used to it, ignore it :) Markus > On 27 Dec 2016, at 22:59, Alan wrote: > > So I bit the bullet and started running an Exit Node (Andromeda), still > early days with a few problems, namely:- > > # It hasn't been given a Stabl

[tor-relays] I am in with 4 exits

https://twitter.com/JGamblin/status/814627227656683521 anyone can beat this? Markus ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list

Re: [tor-relays] assign_to_cpuworker failed

you have a ntp daemon running? Markus > On 14 Jan 2017, at 17:30, diffusae wrote: > > Thanks for your reply. > > On 13.01.2017 23:15, teor wrote: >> Check the other warnings/notices near this warning. >> If there aren't any, then there's no problem. > > The only warning I have found close to

Re: [tor-relays] 'MyFamily' .... torworld.org

The funny thing is … while bashing torworld nobody cares that I am on my way to be number one. Please dont mind me, just a rodent passing by …. > On 19 Jan 2017, at 22:01, Paul wrote: > > Hey, why don’t you just explain to the relay mailing list what it is all > about..? > > Why are you diff

[tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

tor-0.2.9.9.tar.gz 100%[===>] 5.28M 9.89MB/s in 0.5s 2017-01-23 22:12:41 (9.89 MB/s) - 'tor-0.2.9.9.tar.gz' saved [5534005/5534005] Is this normal behaviour? niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net __

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:2825471195234 (2.5 TiB) TX bytes:2911672053962 (2.6 TiB) looks like a IPv6 to me. Will contact Hostwinds anyway, I hate them with every cell of my body. Thank you Tim. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 24 Jan 2017, at 04:25, teor wrote: > &g

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

Could I get an ELI5 for this please? niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 24 Jan 2017, at 04:40, John Ricketts wrote: > > It is entirely possible this is a result of the HE vs Cogent feud, big break > in the IPv6 routing tables as a cogent is refusing to peer with H

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

BGP should choose another path? BGP Routing is highly “political” but IPs just black holed is really really bad … If this is true: WTF?! niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 24 Jan 2017, at 05:24, teor wrote: > > >> On 24 Jan 2017, at 15:18, niftybunny wrote: >

Re: [tor-relays] Network is unreachable?

Is there any good reason why you (and all the others) are not waving torches and pitchforks? niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 24 Jan 2017, at 05:28, John Ricketts wrote: > > I am forced to peer with both Cogent and HE because of this. > > On Jan 23, 2017, at 22

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

> > (And the likely impact on networks with few IPv4 addresses, which tend > to be in areas with lower levels of network access: typically poorer > areas and less well developed countries.) > *citation needed niftybunny ab...@to-surf-

Re: [tor-relays] *** Spam *** Re: Reminder: If you are on 0.2.9.x, make sure you are running 0.2.9.9

sigh. 3 out of 33 is not too bad, right? could you please tell me which three rodents are still not updated? niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 9 Feb 2017, at 22:45, nusenu wrote: > > > > Nick Mathewson: >> there are still 700 crashable relays on the netw

Re: [tor-relays] *** Spam *** Re: Reminder: If you are on 0.2.9.x, make sure you are running 0.2.9.9

Thats nifty! Thank you very much. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 9 Feb 2017, at 23:15, nusenu wrote: > >> could you please tell me which three rodents are still not updated? > > If you do not know where you run what version, you can ask onionoo to > give

Re: [tor-relays] Shutdown of TorLand1

Thank you for your long service. You will not be forgotten. /bow niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 15 Feb 2017, at 22:55, tor-ad...@torland.is wrote: > > Hi all, > > after 5 years of operation I will shutdown TorLand1 > (https://atlas.torpr

Re: [tor-relays] large server farms

Personal hygiene is very important, Pig-Pen. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 20 Feb 2017, at 03:31, I wrote: > > Hot water? > > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https

Re: [tor-relays] *** Spam *** Re: Provider Suggestion, Scaleway -- Online SAS: not so good for diversity

They are not a reseller, they are a part of the family. https://www.online.net/en/web niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net > On 24 Feb 2017, at 12:06, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > looks like they are an Online SAS reseller. > > as_number: AS12876 > as_name: Onlin

Re: [tor-relays] Tor and CIA leak

Anyone have a download/torrent link for all the stuff or is this website only atm? niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > On 8 Mar 2017, at 18:01, Zac wrote: > > A quick grep returns nothing for riseup: >

Re: [tor-relays] Tor and CIA leak

<3 niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > On 8 Mar 2017, at 20:31, anondroid wrote: > > https://file.wikileaks.org/torrent/WikiLeaks-Year-Zero-2017-v1.7z.torrent > <https://file.wikileaks.org/torrent/W

Re: [tor-relays] What kind of hardware do I need for my relay

Even a 1,8 ghz Atom can max out a 100mbit line … you don't need much … niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > On 20 Mar 2017, at 21:45, Farid Joubbi wrote: > > I'm a little surprised that this

Re: [tor-relays] *** Spam *** 22% of bridges run by a single entity?

Not me. I only have one bridge. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > On 27 Mar 2017, at 17:51, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > is it known that (likely) a single entity is running ~22% of all > bridges? (

Re: [tor-relays] Actual user demographics?

exits) its rare and I try really hard to reduce it further. Also you could ask in /r/tor . Mostly “normal” people in there. If you would like a deeper insight, e-mail me :) niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > O

Re: [tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

>Known TOR exit nodes are listed within the Security Intelligence feed of ASA >Firepower devices. Enabling this to be blacklisted will prevent outbound >communications to TOR networks. Wait, what? niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis fo

Re: [tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

internal network you fucking block guards and entry/middle nodes not exits …. btw, good luck with blocking all guards …. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray PS: >In accordance with known best practices, any organization

Re: [tor-relays] WannaCry fallout FYI

> On 15. May 2017, at 01:42, Mirimir wrote: > > On 05/14/2017 11:56 AM, niftybunny wrote: >> The last time I checked .onion domains don’t need exits. Every Tor >> node can be a chain of the path to the .onion domain. So it is >> completely pointless to block all the

Re: [tor-relays] Kitten1 and kitten2 compromised (guard/hs/fallback directory)

Sure it makes sense. Here, these IPs are the bad guys, we found them, call the police. Ticket closed. Congratulation from some clueless CTO for the awesome and fast work. End of story. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

Same with 0.3.0.5. Upgrading to 0.3.0.7 helped on most relays. niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > On 22. May 2017, at 20:29, tor-relay.d...@o.banes.ch wrote: > > Dear all, > > we are operating two exit

Re: [tor-relays] Neldoreth relay seized ?

c would be more useful, even if >it would take other nodes to reach a possible control server. The traffic from the enduser should have 3 layers of AES256 encrypted traffic, am I right? niftybunny ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray _

Re: [tor-relays] Best practices to move a Tor node?

niftybunny First they came for the student emails and I did not speak out - because I was on snapchat Then they came for WhatsApp and I did not speak out - because I used signal. Then they came for the file sharers and I did not speak out - because I use all UC and Opera turbo. Then they came

Re: [tor-relays] Best practices to move a Tor node?

w.aileronit.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf > Of teor > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 6:39 PM > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Best practices to move

Re: [tor-relays] Go home GeoIP, you're drunk.

; Is there anything I can/should do about this (I doubt it)? No. > Will this > affect my Tor node consensus weight? Njet. > As it is not an exit node, I am > hoping it won't matter much. > Get yourself booze and join your GeoIPs. > -Ralph niftybunny >

Re: [tor-relays] ORSN DNS servers vs OpenNic

I use: nameserver 204.152.184.76 nameserver 194.150.168.168 nameserver 213.73.91.35 nameserver 8.8.8.8 works fine. Google as gateway of last resort :) niftybunny Where ignorance is bliss, 'Tis folly to be wise. Thomas Gray > On 4. Aug 2017, at 16:11, Chuck McAndrew > wrote: &g

Re: [tor-relays] ORSN DNS servers vs OpenNic

I got lots of "[WARN] eventdns: All nameservers have failed" with my own DNS server. With the 4 DNS servers I posted here a few minutes ago, I never saw this warning again. niftybunny “Cheery was aware that Commander Vimes didn't like the phrase 'The innocent

Re: [tor-relays] ORSN DNS servers vs OpenNic

> On 4. Aug 2017, at 18:43, Nagaev Boris wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, niftybunny > mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>> wrote: >> I use: >> >> nameserver 204.152.184.76 >> nameserver 194.150.168.168 >> nameserver 213.73.91.35 &g

Re: [tor-relays] blocking >1 connections per ip address onto Tor DirPort

The “normal” classification of DDOS is more than 25 packets/sec to your server/vps. You could check if it is a smurf attack or x-mas or whatever, but normally you will be null routed with 250k+ or the (hopefully) good anti DDOS hardware of the ISP will kick in. Markus “Cheery was aware t

Re: [tor-relays] Any IP allocations available out there?

The smallest block you can advertise with your own AD is a /24 as far as I know. Getting a IPv4 /24 is …. expensive and hard to get. If you are not incredible rich and very tech savvy and a hardcore Tor supporter: Forget it. Get yourself a few virtual servers. niftybunny “For too long, we

Re: [tor-relays] Any IP allocations available out there?

really good patience try your style in DownUnder or any near Asia country. Japan has a lot of cheap servers and is near you, at least its nearer than Germany where I am sitting :) niftybunny PS: Congratulations on beating the USA with DataCaps and ridiculous DSL prices :/ “For too long, we have

Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay making normal internet unusable

RelayBandwidthRate 10 MB # limit for the bandwidth we'll use to relay RelayBandwidthBurst 10 MB # maximum rate when relaying bursts of traffic is your friend. Copy & paste it in your torrc file.Perhaps you should modify the MB/sec rate too :) niftybunny “For too long, we ha

Re: [tor-relays] Any IP allocations available out there?

Could you please define “Metadata”? Server connections? That would be quite a bit with a high traffic tor relay … niftybunny “For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'” --David Cameron, 201

Re: [tor-relays] Would you also like to have family-level atlas pages?

Yes and some freedom fries please. “For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens 'as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone'” --David Cameron, 2015 > On 12. Sep 2017, at 00:10, nusenu wrote: > > Hi, > > Iain - the atlas maintainer - asked on t

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 80, Issue 26

Can confirm :( “Cheery was aware that Commander Vimes didn't like the phrase 'The innocent have nothing to fear', believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in the longer term even more from those who say things like 'The innocent have nothing to fear'.” ― Terry

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

DigitalOcean demanded access to my FaceBook and Twitter account for verification … I do not own a Twitter or Facebook account … Which ISP is it? Cheers, Markus > On 8. Dec 2017, at 01:54, Tanous wrote: > > Hi, > Im running an exit relay for 116 days. Today i received an email from my ISP >

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

Same happened here. Sent them their stuff they demanded and 2 days later my account was restored and they are “fine” with abuse. Cheers, Markus > On 8. Dec 2017, at 02:24, Tanous wrote: > > it is Online.net. > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > >>

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

I do not think they will compromise and this is “normal” behaviour for a ISP from Europe. Online.net is cheap, fast and has good support. I would send them what they demanded. In Germany you have to send them a copy of your passport before they even get you a server. Got thi

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

x/pgp> | > 0x52FA4EE1722D54EB > > > On 2017-12-08 02:46, niftybunny wrote: > >> I do not think they will compromise and this is "normal" behaviour for a ISP >> from Europe. Online.net <http://online.net/> is cheap, fast and has good >> support.

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

atever … Markus > On 8. Dec 2017, at 13:24, niftybunny wrote: > > > >> On 8. Dec 2017, at 10:23, Alexander Dietrich > <mailto:alexan...@dietrich.cx>> wrote: >> >> I have no experience with Hetzner, but no ISP in Germany (or elsewhere) has >> ever a

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

> On 8. Dec 2017, at 14:15, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > On 08.12.2017 02:46, niftybunny wrote: > >> I do not think they will compromise and this is “normal” behaviour for >> a ISP from Europe. > > I strongly disagree to that being "normal" in any sha

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

this, thats why it is legal to shit/piss in churches. Your logic. > On 8. Dec 2017, at 14:43, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > On 08.12.2017 14:29, niftybunny wrote: > >>>> In Germany you have to send them a copy of your passport before >>>> they even get

Re: [tor-relays] ISP is aking me to send a selfie holding my identity card

hings. Welcome to Lala Land! > On 8. Dec 2017, at 14:57, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > On 08.12.2017 14:48, niftybunny wrote: > >> As a baby I pissed in a church. I was never in jail for this, thats >> why it is legal to shit/piss in churches. Your logic. > > So now

Re: [tor-relays] botnet? abusing/attacking guard nodes

Same shit here. It looks like this: https://i.imgur.com/rokqahz.png Markus “Cheery was aware that Commander Vimes didn't like the phrase 'The innocent have nothing to fear', believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in the long

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

Still under heavy attack even with the MaxMemInQueues and 0.3.2.8-rc. I need 2 xeons to push 30 mbit as a guard/middle … Markus > On 22. Dec 2017, at 00:25, teor wrote: > > > On 22 Dec 2017, at 10:08, Roger Dingledine wrote: > (Connection refused; CONNECTREFUSED; count 18; recommendat

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

m 6000 (normal) to 2 connections within an hour. Someone doesn't like me very much :( Markus > On 22. Dec 2017, at 08:42, Felix wrote: > > Am 22-Dec-17 um 08:25 schrieb niftybunny: >> Still under heavy attack even with the MaxMemInQueues and 0.3.2.8-rc. I >> need 2

Re: [tor-relays] Recent wave of abuse on Tor guards

- 26 > your-server.de <http://your-server.de/> - 66 > ip-54-36-51.eu <http://ip-54-36-51.eu/> - 17 > > That was in < 24hrs. > > On Dec 22, 2017 3:38 AM, "niftybunny" <mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>> wrote: > Short answer: > > h

Re: [tor-relays] Tried to establish rendezvous on non-OR circuit

No, you are fine. > On 14. Jan 2018, at 21:04, TorGate wrote: > > Hi to all, > is this a problem :-) > > [WARN] Tried to establish rendezvous on non-OR circuit with purpose Acting > as rendevous (pending) [9 duplicates >hidden] > 18:34: > > and > > [WARN] Tried to establish rendezvous

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

exit or guard? > On 18. Jan 2018, at 21:37, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: > > Does anyone here use a vsp hosting provider which offers unlimited bandwidth > usage at a reasonable cost monthly? > > Would need to run / offer Ubuntu. > > Country is of little importance. > > Thanks. > -- > >

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

online.net <http://online.net/> trabia.com <http://trabia.com/> (ask first) both offer 100mbit for less than 5 euros > On 18. Jan 2018, at 21:46, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: > > On January 18, 2018 3:39:22 PM EST, niftybunny > wrote: >> exit or guard?

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

bulletproof VPS but even offshore ISPs ban Tor Exists together with CP and hate speech. Welcome to the wonderful world of Tor Exists. Enjoy your stay. Markus > On 18. Jan 2018, at 23:45, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: > > January 18, 2018 4:50 PM, "George" w

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

ing me. And by the way, you dont have much choice with traffic flat and Tor exit friendly anyway. Markus > On 19. Jan 2018, at 01:20, Fabian A. Santiago > wrote: > > On January 18, 2018 6:26:40 PM EST, Mirimir wrote: >> On 01/18/2018 11:54 AM, niftybunny wrote: >>>

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

1/10 what > is advertised, which is still good, considering the cost, but I'd like to run > higher bandwidth relays. > > Also, does anyone know if the KVM offered through online.net > <http://online.net/> have virtual media capabilities? > > Thanks, > > Tyler &g

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

OVH does NOT accept any more Exit at all. Never. Even if hell freezes over. They hate us with every pore in their bodies. Source: Called and e-mailed them a few times over the last 3 years. > On 19. Jan 2018, at 17:25, Anders Burmeister > wrote: > > Will recommend OVH.ie, running 6 relays in

Re: [tor-relays] Good vsp providers

Besides the abuse mails. Am I the only one who gets 100s of abuse mails a day? > On 20. Jan 2018, at 00:30, I wrote: > OVH does NOT accept any more Exit at all. Never. Even if hell freezes over. They hate us with every pore in their bodies > > If you ask them they don't but if you ju

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

Slow. Really slow. Get the Intel Atom with scaleway.com Or test it for yourself. They bill per hour and they are dirt cheap. > On 21. Jan 2018, at 20:02, Quintin wrote: > > I see online.net has a lot of ARM VPSes. Does tor run > fine on these? > > Q > > > -- > 0101100

Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

You only define what the max bw is. The “real” bw Tor is using depends on the measurement of the authority servers. https://atlas.torproject.org/#search/flag:authority If you have a bad connection to them: bad luck :( Pro tip: Get yourself

Re: [tor-relays] Upgraded relay non show in ATLAS

Starting Nmap 7.40 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2018-01-25 17:41 CET Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our ping probes, try -Pn Nmap done: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 3.41 seconds From the outside you cant be reached. Markus > On 25. Jan 2018, at 15:12, MLTor Node wr

Re: [tor-relays] Upgraded relay non show in ATLAS

IPv6 > Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org <https://nmap.org/> ) at 2018-01-25 > 20:23 Romance Standard Time > Nmap scan report for 2001:470:1f12:62c::2:51 > Host is up. > > PORTSTATESERVICE > 433/tcp filtered nnsp > > Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) sc

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

gt; On 28. Jan 2018, at 18:56, Quintin wrote: > > these scaleway.com <http://scaleway.com/> hosts are quite neat. do I need to > notify them I intend to use it as a tor exit? > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:06 PM niftybunny <mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>> wr

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

Exit or Guard? > On 28. Jan 2018, at 19:11, Quintin wrote: > > any other providers you can recommend? > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 7:59 PM niftybunny <mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>> wrote: > Its better to tell them. I used them for nearly 2 years and I had

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

If you want Exit + Speed + Cheap + Unlimited Traffic = Online.net <http://online.net/> / Scaleway.com There is not much Choice. On 28. Jan 2018, at 19:17, Quintin wrote: > > Exit > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:16 PM niftybunny <mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net>

Re: [tor-relays] tor on arm vps

gt; On 28. Jan 2018, at 19:19, niftybunny wrote: > > If you want Exit + Speed + Cheap + Unlimited Traffic = Online.net > <http://online.net/> / Scaleway.com <http://scaleway.com/> > > There is not much Choice. > > On 28. Jan 2018, at 19:17, Quintin &l

Re: [tor-relays] Exits lost their function

reject 80 Thats why. > On 9. Feb 2018, at 19:25, nusenu wrote: > > > > Paul: >> What could bring several exits at different providers and different >> operating systems (Linux and FreeBSD) down on the same day, Jan 21st? >> >> Since, while they still run as relays, they don’t show as exits

Re: [tor-relays] Exits lost their function

Minimum is: accept *:53 accept *:80 accept *:443 > On 9. Feb 2018, at 19:35, Paul wrote: > > > > Am 09.02.2018 um 19:28 schrieb niftybunny: >> reject 80 >> >> Thats why. > > > Was there a change of rules on that day? > Reject 80 was always t

Re: [tor-relays] Exits lost their function

The thing is, someone should scan all relays and inform them that their exit flag is gone. We need every exit we can get. > On 11. Feb 2018, at 00:37, nusenu wrote: > > >> so on that day I guess dir auths updated to the version enforcing >> 80+443 for exit flag > > >

Re: [tor-relays] DoS stats from exits running 0.3.3.2-alpha

me: Feb 17 08:55:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 4 days 5:59 hours, with 15062 circuits open. I've sent 4436.48 GB and received 4399.31 GB. Feb 17 08:55:27.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 11751/11751 TAP, 363728/363728 NTor. Feb 17 08:55:27.000 [notice] Since sta

Re: [tor-relays] DoS stats from exits running 0.3.3.2-alpha

niftychipmunk > On 17. Feb 2018, at 11:40, nusenu wrote: > > > > niftybunny: >> me: > > what is the fingerprint of this exit relay? > > > -- > https://mastodon.social/@nusenu > twitter: @nusenu_ > > __

Re: [tor-relays] DoS stats from exits running 0.3.3.2-alpha

niftyjerboa: Feb 17 08:53:12.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 4 days 5:59 hours, with 21016 circuits open. I've sent 4333.53 GB and received 4288.98 GB. Feb 17 08:53:12.000 [notice] Circuit handshake stats since last time: 17663/17663 TAP, 649315/649315 NTor. Feb 17 08:53:12.000 [notice]

Re: [tor-relays] FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS Tor Image

No multihoming = no AS. I do not pay for things I do not really need. https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/asnameshare 0 OVH SAS 15.76 22.92 7.34499 1 Online S.a.s. 9.6 10.110.59 372 2 Hetzner Online GmbH

[tor-relays] Torservers relay family decreased? (solved)

re deeply than I am › could take a look at this. Also, if there is further information › available, please tell me. › "Mit dem Wissen wächst der Zweifel. / Doubt grows with knowledge." › -- Goethe https://imgur.com/JG514ja › Best regards, › T. Westerhever Whatever

Re: [tor-relays] Torservers relay family decreased?

Just so we are on the same page: You accused us to counterfeit to be Zwiebelfreunde, even being a bad (state) actor, did nothing at all to contact us and cant even read simple Interwebs tools. What did you expect? niftybunny > On 10. Sep 2018, at 19:05, Tobias Westerhever >

Re: [tor-relays] Torservers relay family decreased?

His complete story is a pile of bullshit. If you want me out, get me banned, I am happy to throw all the money I am paying every month into blackjack and hookers with my good friend Bender. niftybunny > On 13. Sep 2018, at 19:11, Paul wrote: > > Hello Tobias, > > please s

Re: [tor-relays] New exit node

DigitalOcean and Vultr have traffic limits. 1 TB sounds great, but is nothing over a month. Not sure about OVH. I tried to run relays in Japan and Singapore some years ago. It was bad, you are more than 1 km away from the rest of the crowd so expect delay and jitter :( > On 16. Sep 2018, a

Re: [tor-relays] New exit node

ftware. Yes, Layer 3 switching should be line speed and routing is slowly dying. Its still very very slow. Don’t believe me. Try it for yourself. > On 16. Sep 2018, at 23:36, I wrote: > >> niftybunny wrote > >> I tried to run relays in Japan and Singapore some years ago.

Re: [tor-relays] Exit friendly ISPs in Australia

They have to take care of the abuse mails, normally a real human will doing this job and this costs money. Companies want to make money, these costs and the possible reputation costs (people get upset if someone tries to hack their server/computer/hamster) is a really good reason to refuse you

Re: [tor-relays] Exit friendly ISPs in Australia

> On 17. Sep 2018, at 10:25, grarpamp wrote: > >> these costs You do not know who much abuse you get. How should they calculate it? Even if they can calculate it, there is no special Tor exit tariff out there. So they bill you per hour? Thats all not really working ... > > They didn't hint a

Re: [tor-relays] Exit friendly ISPs

> On 17. Sep 2018, at 21:24, grarpamp wrote: > > On 9/17/18, niftybunny wrote: >> [cost, cost, cost] > >>> freedom is a profitable business model. > > We charge double and up rates to ignore and manage everything, > short of legal process served, with y

Re: [tor-relays] New Exit-Relay / First abuse issues

much. Moritz is 100% correct. > -- > Moritz Bartl > https://www.torservers.net/ > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > <https://lists.torproject.or

Re: [tor-relays] Greypony / Conrad Rockenhaus offline?

A Tor friendly ISP is gone has nothing to do with a Tor relay mailing list? > On 3. Oct 2018, at 03:29, I wrote: > > That has nothing to do with this list. > > ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Tor bridge on Windows 10 going down for a reason I cannot detect?

Source? > On 23. Oct 2018, at 23:13, Mike Mitch wrote: > > I noticed that the system is running Windows10? If this is the situation > then you might want to downgrade the server to anything. Not knowing the ISP > service I cannot say for certain, but, ATT and most of the cable companies >

Re: [tor-relays] Tor bridge on Windows 10 going down for a reason I cannot detect?

our 6th amendment right to > face your accuser. All this, of course is the reason Julian Asange and > Edward Snowden have been forced to flee the country. But then again, I am no > one... > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:15 PM niftybunny <mailto:ab...@to-surf-and-protect.net&

Re: [tor-relays] when do dead "Alleged Family Members" disappear?

you have removed it from your torrc under MyFamily ? > On 4. Nov 2018, at 17:52, Tim Kuijsten wrote: > > In the past I've shortly ran a relay that I have shut down because of > performance issues[1]. But even after a month now it still appears as an > "alleged family member" on the Tor metrics

Re: [tor-relays] Blutmagie retired

miss it > On 9. Nov 2018, at 19:50, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > The operator of Blutmagie Torstatus, Olaf Selke has retired > the service. For years Blutmagie has been a fantastic resource > for the Tor community and I am writing to express my gratitude > to Olaf for his wonderful co

Re: [tor-relays] 2 relays at the same IP address with a flat rate, 2 exits versus 1 exit + 1 non-exit

we still need more exits. go exits. > On 9. Nov 2018, at 21:34, Toralf Förster wrote: > > I do wonder, > > if it makes sense under such circumstances to have 1 non-exit and 1 exit -or- > would it be better to have 2 exits? > > > -- > Toralf > PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E > > > __

Re: [tor-relays] First abuse complaints

you are getting used to it. modify the https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorAbuseTemplates templates to your liking and send out the response. just wait for your first subpoena :) markus > On 10. Nov 2018,

Re: [tor-relays] First abuse complaints

#x27;t sign up for the "IT and legal" class at > my school. > > - willmar > > On 11/10/18 12:33 AM, niftybunny wrote: >> you are getting used to it. >> >> modify >> the https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorAbuseTemplates >> t

Re: [tor-relays] Explaining Tor to worried parent

Okay, this is the tldr version, if you want the long version e-mail me at ab...@to-surf.and-protect.net 1. ISPs want to make money, in fact they have to turn in a profit to survive. Yeah, I know that sounds unbelievable. Tor is legal but someone has to take

Re: [tor-relays] Explaining Tor to worried parent

. Never heard back from them. I even wrote a snail mail letter to them. Never answered. Now they get a reply from my mail script and thats it. Markus > On 12. Nov 2018, at 11:59, Kenneth Freeman wrote: > > > > On 11/12/2018 08:23 AM, niftybunny wrote: > >> 1. ISP

  1   2   >