rs as well as
personal machines I own do not have this issue.
Do you know what could be causing this?
-Neel Chauhan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ct.org/#details/A20840A16CB658024B0D3A0E3F19A9C0E34C843F):
neel@megora:~ % telnet 2345.com 80 Trying 42.62.30.180... telnet:
connect to address 42.62.30.180: Operation timed out telnet: Unable to connect
to remote host neel@megora:~ %
Verizon FiOS 50/50 in Brooklyn, NY, Tor midd
e willing to compile everything.
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ort: If you want to make the Tor network more resilient however, non NA/EU
locations are important. If you just want a higher bandwidth number, it's hard
to beat Europe.
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays
useful as domain fronting but not stop spammers
from using Gmail to
send spam to mailing list subscribers.
I also get spam from FreeBSD's mailing lists, but those are mainly advertising
emails for things
like web/logo design, marketing, etc. that I have no interest in.
Thanks,
Neel Ch
with a single instance to see if it handles 300 mbps. If not, I
will switch to two 150mbps instances.
I sadly am using OpenSSL, but that is so I can use the crypto engine and
pre-built packages.
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
December 28, 2018 9:13 AM, "Neel Chauhan&qu
ments/c5whh5/verizon_blocks_verizoncom_on_tor_relay_ip/
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
oject.org/#details/AED76373324653A0522DF30550BA31902B2CFA44
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/D5B8C38539C509380767D4DE20DE84CF84EE8299
Thanks,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.o
ess. I can confirm this on FiOS, but
I don't use Verizon Wireless (my smartphone uses Sprint) so I can't test
it there.
A traceroute to tor26's IP address 86.59.21.38 from a Brooklyn apartment
shows this is filtered on Verizon's backbone:
neel@xb2:~ % traceroute 86.59.2
do
read NANOG) and unblocked tor26. Here is a (successful) traceroute:
neel@flex:~ % traceroute 86.59.21.38
traceroute to 86.59.21.38 (86.59.21.38), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 unknown (192.168.1.1) 0.886 ms 0.567 ms 0.460 ms
2 lo0-100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-401.verizon-gni.net (173.68.77.1
ress, but
you would need to pay $$$ for this.
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2018-05-26 16:19, Keifer Bly wrote:
Yes but I would run it through the proxy so it would have the proxy IP
address. I just noticed tor could use more bridges as there are four
times as many public
on websites and guards don't.
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2018-06-06 14:42, Keifer Bly wrote:
Hello, I have one question.
I have been running my relay “torland” at
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=db1af6477bb276b6ea5e72132684096eee779d30
For roughly 3 mon
ause most
telcos refuse to deploy fiber).
Hope this helps.
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On Jun 7, 2018, at 5:39 AM, Neel Chauhan wrote:
The guard flag gets automatically assigned to you if you have enough
bandwidth and uptime. You usually don't get to choose. You can still
er if you're
like me.
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2018-06-09 00:08, Mirimir wrote:
On 06/08/2018 04:06 PM, Keifer Bly wrote:
I receive them whenever I send a note to this address, starting with
the first time I participated in a conversation with this thread.
Thank you.
W
g to get political, you should push for net
neutrality in your country.
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2018-06-11 14:29, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Graeme Neilson dijo [Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 11:53:20AM +1200]:
See if you can route to all the authorities.
Tor requires that all relay
It seems that I am getting spam from a new email address:
camrynbentley870...@ao.ovsum.com
The pattern is that the emails are from *@*.ovsum.com addresses. Just
block this pattern as well, and report your emails to SpamCop.
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2018-06-08 20:24
e multiple instances on a single computer:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/security/tor/files/pkg-message.in?revision=425102&view=markup&pathrev=472266
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2018-06-16 07:18, I wrote:
Is there a way to collectively install an
dle relays,
but only a few allow exits).
Hope this helps.
Best,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2018-07-02 09:27, Guillermo Narvaez wrote:
Hello everyone,
Sadly I'm stoping the tor daemon in my relay due high cost of
bandwidth ($100), in the meantime I start to search an option
use Debian.
That's it.
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
nonetheless I find it positive that Neel now finally has a (proper?)
MyFamily
config probably because of this non-perfect way of collecting FPs.
Well, my relays don't use FamilyGenerator.
I still hope no one is using onionoo query results to alter their
config *automatically*
I
w (199.254.238.52) don't seem to be calculating
any consensus value for Tor relays in the last few days.
Has anyone else been having this problem? And if the Tor consensus
operators are reading this, (approximately) when would this problem get
resolved?
Thanks,
Neel Chauhan
__
VPS with CoolHousing (through
their Virtual Server Lite brand) and I do the same (block IP addresses
I get complaints from).
-Neel Chauhan
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bi
d (https://vpsboard.com/).
-Neel Chauhan
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
VPS for a
long time. No wonder why someone on this mailing list had trouble with
ITL earlier this month. They no longer want exit nodes.
-Neel Chauhan
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.to
hp
https://serverastra.com/
https://blazingfast.io/
Thanks,
Neel Chauhan
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
g the fingerprint for the affected one. Now I
have to wait for the ramp-up phase, yay!
Merry christmas,
Frank
Best,
Neel
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, December 4th, 2022 at 11:25 PM, Frank Steinborn
wrote:
Hi,
I want to show you my anti DDoS solution for my relays (a
USA: they might look at
the first allocation after the RIR, which says "USA".
When I ran Tor exit relays on leased IP space, some abuse reports went
directly to me, but some went to the IP lessors, not realizing IP
leasing and reallocations are now commonplace.
-Neel
On Thu, Jan 18
single instance, but can use multiple if I have to
* When I move, I will upgrade my server to FreeBSD 12.0
* My server supports hardware accelerated AES and SHA. I am using this on
FreeBSD with the aesni kernel module and Tor with "HardwareAccel 1" and
"AccelName cryptode
s close to both you and I :)
Sounds great.
> Keep us in the loop on the relay and any customizations you're doing.
OK, I will. When I get to setting up the server, I will post an article to my
website
(https://www.neelc.org) and a copy of the article here (@tor-relays).
Thanks,
Neel Ch
the
shaping and free the Tor process to do other things (after all, Tor is still
singlethreaded) but adds complexity to your OS/network setup.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
January 14, 2019 10:09 PM, "Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T." mailto:igro...@aileronit.com?to=%22Isaac%20Grover,
Ubiquiti or pfSense) help?
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
d-faces-better-tests-tougher-competition/
Would running two instances help with a consumer router's limited NAT
Table?
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Tor traffic from everything else unless you go business class
* Verizon would probably notice my "exit" relay from abuse complaints
and then would say "you can't do this on FiOS" unless I go business
class
I run an exit from a dedicated server (not a
instances.
Why am I getting this abnormal CPU usage? What's the solution? I don't
want to use Linux but can use another *BSD or Solaris/Illumos if I must.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject
our
SOCKSPort. Set it to 0 to not listen, or to a random number if you have
to listen for SOCKS connections.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
just
overloaded (or have bad peering with Verizon)? Or is it just the relay
ramp-up phase in action?
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
of
the US who forces 802.X authentication to use VDSL/FTTH that is only
spoken on their router.
But your uplink probably is crappy if you have cable, DSL, or fixed
wireless.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2019-04-25 17:48, nusenu wrote:
to...@protonmail.com:
I need to move to a new
mer: I don't run Debian on my relays. I run FreeBSD relays. I
have used Debian on my desktop briefly in 2012 before switching to
FreeBSD as a desktop. I have never **really** run Debian as a server so
I can't help you further with unattended-upgrades.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.o
irus/malware gaining
access to your email via a browser exploit. Check for this first.
-Neel
On 2019-05-16 13:31, K. Besig wrote:
I've run a home relay on and off for several years and recently, for
the first time, had my email blocked by the ISP rendering it
impossible to login into my 3rd
those who have middle relays on their home broadband connection (not
bridge or exit), both on Verizon FiOS and other ISPs regardless of
country or technology, please test for if Verizon.com is blocked.
Thank You,
Neel Chauhan
___
tor-relays mailing
may not have.
After all, Sonic supports Net Neutrality and Verizon opposes NN.
About the server, I have a powerful HPE ProLiant as mentioned earlier,
but like other said at minimum you need a i5/i7 CPU, or an equivalent
Xeon or AMD CPU. So this means no NUCs or HPE MicroServers.
-Neel
===
https
By "NUC" I was meaning the low-end Celeron boxes. A NUC with a i7-8650U
should work for Tor and a dedicated AP. It won't be as good as a desktop
or server CPU, but for your use case it's fine as a relay and AP/router.
However, the built-in Wi-Fi is usually only a single
you want a custom OS, you will need
iLO (HP/HPE's remote management, Primcast uses HP/HPE servers). An older
server (pre-2011) may mean you'll need Windows and Internet Explorer
(NOT MS Edge) to use the console, while a newer server will work with
HTML5 on Windows/Mac/Linux/BSD/etc.
ow if Scaleway will give you this, so consider
switching if you have to)
* If your CPU supports Intel Quick Assist, consider using this to
accelerate crypto/SSL. If supported, you may not have to get more IPv4
addresses or change servers (I have not tried this, though).
-Neel
===
https://www.neel
Tor as a NT service. You won't
have to worry about a hypervisor and will help relay diversity along the
way.
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
On 2019-10-17 15:20, William Pate wrote:
I finally got around to playing with this some more.
Thank you for your message, Bruce. I searched for
.
In fact, my server's CPU usage never goes beyond 1%.
Is this normal now that sbws is being deployed? Or is it bad peering on
my relay?
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
relays and start from scratch?
About switching ISPs, I'm not switching to Comcast for obvious
well-documented reasons, and neither CenturyLink nor Frontier/Ziply
Fiber serve me, not even copper.
Best,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
t;Gigabit" pipe, and I am suspecting the overloaded authority
servers are a factor. Are they?
It could also be my current ISP's (Wave Broadband) crap peering, but
would I really want to use Comcast?
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
to
ere a solution? Is it backbone
congestion due to COVID-19? The high load on dirauths? sbws regressions?
Can I help fix this issue? I am a Core Tor contributor and am open to
also working on sbws.
Is there a way to optimize my relays (they run FreeBSD).
-Neel
===
https:/
ring around June.
Is anyone else hosting West Coast relays having this issue? Is
"longclaw" actually measuring bandwidth from Europe? If so, WHY?
I got in contact with "longclaw"'s admin and he wasn't too helpful.
Best,
Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
Surprisingly, longclaw stopped measuring and the consensus weights shot
up.
My home ISP, "Wave G" has shitty peering so it didn't shot up as much.
But my Psychz dedicated server fortunately did see a solid increase.
-Neel
On 2020-08-19 16:02, i...@backplanedns.org wrote:
S
oes have congestion
issues from time to time, but this affects more than Tor.
Sometimes, faravahar also may have this issue, but not to the same
extent, and I can't confirm if this is true.
Thank you for responding.
Best,
juga
-Neel
___
tor-relays mai
count but since it's a "residential" address CL's systems
may not 'allow' this [1], so that's why I'm asking.
Comcast is not an option for me despite technically being "available"
for obvious well-documented reasons. After all, CenturyLink is giving
never run
RHEL-based distros as a "server" (I've always run FreeBSD there) so I
can't tell you my experiences.
Thanks a lot!
-Neel
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://
a biggie for me, but while I could go Comcast with better IPv6,
I'd rather have a high bandwidth relay than an IPv6 one with Comcast's
slow uploads/caps. Other Seattle ISPs like Webpass, Wave, and Atlas
aren't in my new home.
-Neel Chauhan
===
https://www.neelc.org/
___
found people could use pluggable transports,
like HTTPS obfs4 bridges and maybe they found blocking Tor itself is
ineffective, or trying to block "meek" users ended up blocking Microsoft
and ASP.NET/Azure-based webapps.
Disclaimer: I work at Microsoft, but not on Azure as of now. I
irauths, unlike
how Bitcoin could get manipulated by bad actors with a decentralized
authority system.
Respectfully,
Gary
-Neel
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
more
expensive but I already have exits there and they are excellent.
I never had a great experience with OVH.
-Neel
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
much
more expensive dedicated servers. Prgmr and HostMaze allow exits but has
so-so peering.
I just hope Psychz doesn't continue to complain.
-Neel
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
financial bandwidth to do this right now.
Fortunately Psychz got off my case, for now at least :-).
-Neel
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
get
Spectrum even when other units can, not that I wanted Spectrum, I don't.
-Neel
Regards,
mick:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:25:30 +0200
"Dimitris T. via tor-relays"
allegedly wrote:
similar situation here with hetzner.. got a first report 2 days ago,
and just a while ago got
61 matches
Mail list logo
