On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:37 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>> remember that they took the relay because
>> a *victim* contacted it, not because they think the "guyz behind the
>> software" did.
>
> Civil sue them for stupid thinking / false arrest confiscation,
> loss of service and use, public tarnishment
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 8:47 PM, grarpamp wrote:
That's actually why the torservers.net people suggest *not* using disk
encryption. Having no barriers makes it much easier for the police to
realize that there's nothing useful to them.
>
>>> This falling over may perhaps not be prefe
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:26 PM, nusenu wrote:
>> Since about mid April there are just two similar Exits making up now about
>> 4.5% exit probability together.
>> Located in Panama, run in the okservers.net network, AS395978 ,they don’t
>> give up any further information about themselves.
>>
>>
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Duncan wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul:
>>
>>
>> I agree with that part.
>>
>> But sometimes it helps to look and think things from an extreme point of
>> view:
>> Let's assume the whole TOR would be anonymous in a way that you cant
>> see contacts not even nicknames. W
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, niftybunny
wrote:
> I use:
>
> nameserver 204.152.184.76
> nameserver 194.150.168.168
> nameserver 213.73.91.35
> nameserver 8.8.8.8
>
> works fine. Google as gateway of last resort :)
I'd add also 77.88.8.8 (https://dns.yandex.ru) and 80.80.80.80
(http://freenom.w
Thank you for running the relay!
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Keepyourprivacy
wrote:
> Hello fellow operators of tor relays out there! :)
>
> I'd like to introduce my new relay, it's called keepyourprivacy and hosted
> in the Netherlands, at a provider which is known for high uptime and great
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I do have the following iptables rule here :
>
> # Tor
> #
> dirport=80
> orport=443
>
> $IPT -A INPUT -p tcp --destination-port $dirport --match conntrack
> --ctstate NEW --ma
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 8:22 AM, nusenu wrote:
>> I'm running a few relays on CentOS 7
>> As I'm sticking to the ease of rpm distributions, I'm left behind on
>> 0.2.9.10 from EPEL
>>
>> Does anyone know of another rpm repository with a more up to date version ?
>
> I'm not aware of any updated (t
Hey
Thanks for doing that! It came many times to my mind.
There were efforts on implementing Tor relay in Golang before, by
Tom van der Woerdt:
https://github.com/tvdw/gotor
Have you looked at the project?
In his blog post
https://tvdw.eu/blog/2015/01/24/implementing-a-tor-relay-from-scratch/
To
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Julien ROBIN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's not the first time I hear about Non-Exit IP blocked (but may be some
> people here are more familiar with the subject) : I don't really know what
> are the most used interfaces/websites from which those administrators are
> gettin
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:39 PM, teor wrote:
> Blocking port 80 isn't safe for users: it doubles the number of exits that
> they must use, which doubles their risk of a malicious exit.
The risk of using port 443 is much lower than the risk of using port
80, because information passed through 443
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 25.04.18 14:50, mick wrote:
>
>> I think I'm immensely lucky to get the service I do.
>
> Indeed. I guess DigitalOcean's loss will be Hetzner's gain as far as my
> business is concerned. See https://www.hetzner.com/cloud . I already use
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Matt Traudt wrote:
> On 6/26/18 10:16, dave levi wrote:
>> I'm testing few things in Tor and I noticed that if im changing(from the
>> source code) the number of hop's(nodes) to be more then 3 hop's it
>> work's fine(slowly, but still working) and if im sting only
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was going to ask someone off-list, but the amount of abuse and DCMA
> complaints I have received now have been so much that I have decided that
> the best action to take is to set an exit policy. I run a couple of exit
> nod
14 matches
Mail list logo
