t service.
The relay will not accept any new connections, and thus slowly "fade
out" for the period.
There is no one valid answer to this question. I would say limiting it
so it stays around for 15-20 days per month is a good compromise.
--
most of the time they request information
via fax. They never came to the address(es) of the board members, just
to the formal address of the association.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torpro
as
"origin" of complaints, even though they send zero abuse complaints --
they are just two of our largest and very friendly ISPs, and they show
up because all of that are complaints they forward to us.
[1] https://collector.torproject.org/
--
Mori
; share the report.
>
> Being a fan of "release early, release often" I prefer the current
> alternative.
Totally agreed. Just for the record, Sadia reached out to me to ask
before she posted here what they have so far.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
od, and it
won't be able to reliably detect *and block* bad behaviour.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
when the customer asks. You don't necessarily have to mention
Tor in your request.
> IMHO this kind of knowledge should be spread more "pro-actively", which
> is why I'm posting this on a public list.
Always a good idea to remind people. Maybe this encourages someone to
s
stem Number and IP space, the place to go to
depends on _your_ jurisdiction: ARIN (US/CAN), RIPE (EU), APNIC (Asia),
LANIC (Latin America), AFRINIC (Africa); IP ranges and ASNs can then be
announced by any hosting provider.
For examples, see
https://apps.db.ripe.net/search/query
LLCs)
Which guide is that? You might like
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines . It
does not mention LLCs, but instead mentions non-profits. :-)
And what Nick said. :-)
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-r
On 12/10/2016 09:52 PM, pa011 wrote:
>> btw, it would be awesome to give away t-shirts or something for running
>> diverse relays.
> that was a least a promise the year ago (its not any more)
> - and I believe one should stand to his promises
I don't know where this idea is coming from that it's n
So they are not setting MyFamily properly or someone else is using their
>> contactInfo.
This is correct; our MyFamily settings are very out of sync.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.o
- in a positive sense.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
be hard to argue why a scan does not
automatically mean that it is "illegal" these days, but it might help in
certain discussions.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
simply
blocking all Tor users right away.
In many cases, ISPs are OK if you explain your options, they just want
to see you "dealt with it" within a reasonable timespan (~24 hours) and
are in touch with the sender of the complaint.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
__
ecode.
> If I'm missing something about that, I'd
> happily submit a bug, or even try to fix this myself if I can be pointed
> at where the website code is (if it's open for contributions).
https://gitweb.torproject.org/project/we
e who wanted to be part of the grant didn't do it. I don't think
they ever worked well anyway, and weren't supposed to be used in that
way. We should just shut them down finally.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
t
On 14.04.2017 19:27, Mirimir wrote:
> For exits, speed is better than persistence, right?
There is no scientific answer to that, but I would say aim for at least
10 days per month.
> Also, I can choose VPS in UK vs DE vs US. Which is needed most? And am I
> right that a DE exit will generate the
next week.
We had to temporarily disable some of our exits due to ongoing
negotiations with the provider.
Thank you nusenu for watching out!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.
move within the next few weeks,
I definitely will take you up on that offer.
We have our own AS and v6 space already (AS60729).
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torpr
have actual use for a /24, please contact me
off-list and explain what exactly you would like to do with it. If we
have three other organizations (or reliable individuals) and a couple of
good use cases, we're willing to apply for the /22.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
_
pt. Should be good now -- all relays that we directly have
control over are in one family now. (There are a bunch of 3rd party
relays that contain our contact info without us being responsible for
them...).
Thanks nusenu for watching out.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://
:
> Do you change the number of maximum file descriptors?
In most cases this should not be necessary.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
use one or two more hands, it's fun, and it teaches you a
lot about Tor exit operation.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
sharing that configuration, and maybe even the filters you
already set up?
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
t should be pretty
straightforward: Here also, I would suggest to first (without making a
lot of noise about it) to find out what the rules around Internet usage
are, and just set one up.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays maili
. See you there!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ome minutes (!) for each of the announced times.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tching!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
s check again in a day or so if the problem
persists.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 21.02.2018 20:38, pikami wrote:
> I was wondering if it's possible to run a Web server and tor ORPort on
> the same port.
Not easily. There is sslh, a "port multiplexer", but I have no
experience with it: https://github.com/yrutschle/sslh
--
Moritz Bartl
https
t was seized (it
goes back into the provider pool, so some other customer might be in for
a surprise...). In that case, a relay operator may decide to use disk
encryption for integrity reasons: They at least have to ask you for the
decryption key and cannot silently copy content or easil
(I have not seen this happening ever) than to have
outdated packages/kernels.
See https://torservers.net/wiki/setup/server for some references.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
True, but the location of the server defines the legal territory for the
data center, not your own. Even if you rent a server in a foreign
country, you must still conform and know about your local laws. Then, in
addition, you can take the foreign country's laws into account as well.
--
hite,
Regardless, you should _always_ ask the ISP _beforehand_ if they're ok
with a Tor exit.
For more information, see
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
to
eed to open for incoming TCP
connections is 443 (besides SSH).
The problem with selective filters for outgoing traffic is that Tor
needs to be able to connect to all other Tor relays, some of which use
non-standard ports.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.tor
use
cypherpunks/writecode as login if you don't want to create a user). Thanks!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
is lowendbox.com. What you can do is
collect 50 or so sales@ email addresses of various providers, and email
each of them to ask if they are ok with Tor exits, that you will quickly
deal with all abuse mails, etc. Then, add your results to the
GoodBadISPs page.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.
appens there. Will investigate, thanks for the
notification.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
SD and
Solaris! And FreeDOS! :)
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tion systems helps against single points of failure (like the
Debian OpenSSL issue, or even the 1.x Heartbleed).
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
o combine this with would be a billboard where you
can compete with other relay operators, reach GruntMaster 6000 level etc.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ge servers is located at m247, which are very friendly,
but I don't know if they allow exits, and they're a subsidiary of a UK
company:
https://www.m247.ro/
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@
P will not forward abuse
complaints or even tell you about them, so there is no way for you to
explain yourself.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ds are live. [7 similar message(s) suppressed in last 3600
> seconds]
What bandwidth rate did you set? Mind sharing the fingerprint? It can
take a while for relays to attract more traffic, be patient.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
__
On 07/09/2014 02:07 PM, Kali Tor wrote:
> Is there any reason why something like this would happen? I use yahoo mail
You're using a shitty mail provider.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2014-June/004752.html
https://startpage.com/do/search?query=yahoo+mailman
--
Mori
u/uscode/text/17/512
We are promoting free network access without interference. Yes, we see
these kinds of "attacks" from time to time, but they should be handled
on the destination side. It's not the network providers fault that
endpoint security is so ridiculous.
--
You can restrict any other traffic leaving your machine, but the Tor
process needs to be able to fully mesh with all other relays, and, in
the case of exits, be able to reach all the rest of the internet.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
her port.
> Some time ago I proposed that Tor flags some ports as being unacceptable as
> ORPort[1], but this did not gather much of a momentum.
A port is a number. None of them is special. I really don't see any
reason to discriminate any.
--
Moritz
Everyone in Amsterdam should come. And bring friends! :)
https://blog.torproject.org/events/researchers-practitioners-meetup-pets-amsterdam
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https
Hi,
On 07/25/2014 05:31 PM, Michael Ball wrote:
> does anyone here know of any decent (and somewhat cheap) dedicated server
> providers that offer AES-NI crypto acceleration?
There's actually a lot of providers who offer servers with Intel CPUs
that support AES-NI? I found webhostingtalk.com isn
keys to the relays, but then again we really want to limit the number of
keys that can access our relays for security reasons...
I am returning from vacation tomorrow and will update all relays. Sorry
for the delay.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
per control, the ability to centrally update the MyFamily
statement, etc etc. There have been some threads about it on the mailing
list over time, but as we're all volunteers we can't magically fix
everything immediately...
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
signature.asc
De
rservers.net/wiki/setup/server#multiple_tor_processes
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
y people who used our template torrc and didn't adjust the
contact lines).
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ntry-specific legal information
linked at
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines ,
and this is what we use for Germany: https://www.torservers.net/abuse.html
Thanks for running a relay! :)
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
and it maxes out one core? Spread
the load to more cores then, and limit each of the relay processes so it
stays well below 90%.
https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server#multiple_tor_processes
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-
l below 90%.
> Yes, it's one Tor instance - I thought it will use the network better
> this way. How many Tor instances should be there 4 or 8?
You can run as many instances as you like, but a maximum of 2 per IP.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay for more
details. You can of course change exit policy whenever you like, but to
better be able to see the effect it takes several weeks in each phase.
> Am I right, that later just commenting out that reject line enhance
> the Tor server
Hi Jeremy,
On 09/12/2014 05:02 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> My question: If I want to "try" being an exit node and add allowed
> exit ports slowly, does that help the network or not? For example,
> month 1: allow port 22, month 2: allow IRC ports, and so-on. How does
> the client path selection work
;t use for Tor exits, and I
offered David to host a meek relay there. I'm not too happy about adding
even more infrastructure to our organization and at OVH, but in case
nobody else can be found with a machine that has enough bandwidth for
this we could do it.
--
Moritz Bartl
https:/
On 09/18/2014 10:08 PM, Nusenu wrote:
> Is anonymizer1.torservers.net (81.20.139.145)
> - still running a vulnerable version (0.2.5.3-alpha) - not one of your
> relays?
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/9B41B9B3D4661566C660096B715BC647FBD72A72
It has since been upgraded.
--
size exit relays, it gets
harder the more traffic you push, because of the additional workload
(and scariness) for the ISP from complaints.
[0] https://compass.torproject.org/
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mai
ave known that to argue that the wifi
was misconfigured "by mistake" is a bad excuse.
To come back to the topic, I believe it is perfectly fine to announce
_in advance_ that your relay does not want to see/relay particular
traffic. Then, it is not a question of interfering with traffic,
[7]
https://blog.torservers.net/20130917/reimbursement-for-exit-operators.html
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
8 14:15 - 16:15
See you there!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ill up at that point, ha ha).
Yes, I will definitely try to do that.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
o advertise it ;-)
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi,
I had to move the meetup slightly in time and to a different room. I was
told by CCC orga that they need the original room for Engel meetings.
NEW DATE: 28.12.2014 13:00
LOCATION: HALL C
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2014/wiki/Session:Tor_Relay_Operators_Meetup
See you!
--
Moritz Bartl
an
exit at an exit-friendly hosting company!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
7A8EEC
>
> Regards,
>
> King Kong
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.
ional option, including it as a separate
>>> yml in tasks/main.yml + separate torrc is also a possibility -
>>> but probably not the nicest way (duplicate code, multiple
>>> torrc's).
>>>
>
>> OK... I agree with you... but let's make this a seperate yml task
>> file; your use is quite different than most of the entities
>> currently using this ansible role. So let's add these as a new task
>> file instead of modifying the existing task file.
>
> That is fine with me.
>
> regards,
> Nusenu
>
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ese days. This hasn't changed at all since we last talked. I
not only need ansible (or whatever), I need a person (or many) to take
over. Apart from writing email, I am out.
> Nusenu, I will be in Valencia, Spain for the tor-dev meeting
Excellent. Let's definitely continue this the
server to be configured to listen on a sane number of IPs.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
le on top of that, so they don't even actively set
up all the IPs by themselves (or have an interest in using them all),
they simply 'inherit' them from the ISP.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-rela
to
keep it around for at least 2 weeks per month.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 02/23/2015 06:17 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> It's useful on big nodes. Due to technical limitations in how Tor handle
> multicore, we need to run multiple daemons on a same host so it scales
> better with the CPU. Even if you have AES-NI.
+1
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.
/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
help with a
nice database of complaints. I'm sure other torservers.net operators
would help as well. Obviously one can't simply count the number of
complaints, as you need to take (at least) throughput and exit policy
into account.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
_
;re at the moment best served by running two Tors -- "system
installed" for relaying, Tor Browser for client (web) use. If you want
to anonymize other applications (there be dragons), you can point them
to your system Tor (with SOCKSPort configured).
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
email to Tor Weather went unanswered.
There was a change at Tor recently. The new email address at
https://www.torproject.org/getinvolved/tshirt.html should find its way
to helpful people. This is a service done by volunteers; please give
them a while to work their way down the queue. :-
I am not aware of any AT&T offers that have full Gbit.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On 03/23/2015 10:52 PM, Patrick R McDonald wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:36:34PM +0100, Moritz Bartl wrote:
>> This is LAN, not Internet. Are you sure you have more than 5 Mbps in
>> upstream bandwidth? I am not aware of any AT&T offers that have full Gbit.
> AT&T d
rypt traffic at all; all your traffic will travel to
the SOCKS server in plain. Also, you need to fully trust the provider of
the SOCKS port -- Tor is designed so you don't have to trust any
participant in the network.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://w
subpoena to our lawyer as well.
>
>
> https://mega.co.nz/#!ilIjlZSb!-deirKharWaDtp_UMxhev58E14zeouyoWUbzxeWPvEQ
>
> Greetings
>
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
operators that are unsure how to deal with
complaints or requests for information. If you play by the book, we will
gladly cover legal costs. The thing is, if you play nicely, it is very
unlikely you will need one in the first place.
--
Moritz Bar
current partner orgs. Then, we can send the letter around and
get it co-signed by all the partner orgs and other orgs.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/c
intfection link generation process
works and integrate it. These are unique, manually generated links so
payment happens via TorProject Inc., not simply a static link.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@
subsidiary to separate datacenter operation from
end-user hosting.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ig/sshd_config
> thanks for helping out. cheers
>
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
>>>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>>>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>>>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>>> _______
>>&g
, you add:
ORPort [IPv6::address]:port
IPv6Exit 1
ExitPolicy reject6 *:*
(or a more open exit policy respectively)
Thanks!
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https
use of lines like "ExitPolicy accept *:80" which mention a port but
> not an IPv4 IP?
It is exclusively using accept6/reject6 lines.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
htt
anpages and in the howto that I've linked to.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
with other Tor relay
fans, similar to what I did? Especially since a fast relay currently
helps the network more than a lot of small ones.
[1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs
[2]
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2015/05/whos-scanning-your-net
On 06/25/2015 02:38 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> I've added them back in, since these ports should only be used for
> user-authenticated SMTP, and not spam. Has anyone experienced any abuse
> from these ports that involved non-authenticated mail/spam?
We don't.
--
go:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2014-July/007181.html
I also remember another list of "diversity criteria" that someone
posted, but I can't remember who or in which thread.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays
On 06/25/2015 05:12 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
>> Besides the obvious requirements of a good relay (e.g. speed,
>> geo-diversity, constant uptime), what qualities make a relay valuable to
>> the Tor network and its users?
> George posted some ideas a while ago:
> http
y, tell them you have blocked the destination range for 180
days (or something). Maybe this is already enough.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi
rver . Most of the high
bandwidth optimization parts are obsolete (and marked as such), modern
kernels and modern OpenSSL do much better by default.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torpro
jects/tor/wiki/doc/TorExitGuidelines
links to it, as well as to
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorRelaySecurity .
Both these pages could use some overhaul, but they're not too bad.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-
unting period. To prevent all servers from
waking at the same time, Tor will also wait until a random point in each
period before waking up.
--
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
