On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo
> wrote:
> "safe":
>
>> This would be my first time running an exit relay and I'd be happy to
>> hear advice and suggestions!
>
> According to the spec, your relay will never gain the exit
y car insurance
works in the US with 'points' might make sense, but that would totally
break the whole point of Tor - to provide anonymity for its users.
Bleah.
Pesky humans :)
-Chris
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:02:45AM
I'm having a similar situation. Linode issued a ToS violation because
my linode on which I run a relay was a source of spam.
Very strange because I had reject *.* (no exit) set in my torrc.
Anyway I've had to give up and shut down FiatLux. Kind of a bummer, I
really enjoyed contributing to Tor.
Sending your tor process a 'kill -USR1' yields a wealth of interesting info
in the logs, although this isn't what you want I know :)
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Alex Beal wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I was wondering what, if any, software you use for monitoring your relays.
> It would be nice
That stinks.
Linode has the same policy WRT exit relays.
If they get too many abuse complaints, they ask you to stop running a
relay. The way US law is structured, I can't actually blame them for this.
However they don't care if you're running a middle node. Your
bandwidth/VPS, your call. A *
