Hi,
when I browse through the list of relays I find many router names,
which correlate in some way, but which don't specify a family in their
descriptors.
Just to name a few:
* 2* c5VycfOP
* 3* c516a
* Caldron, Caldron2, Caldron3
* BlgTOR2, BlgTOR
* DwarfHappy, DwarfSleepy, DwarfSneezy, DwarfDope
eFamily) suggests that it's not relevant for the 1-node
>> case.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>>
>> 2012/1/5 Tor Relays at brwyatt.net:
>>>
>>> Probably just misconfigured. If there are emails attached to the nodes
>>> you
>>> coul
y I mailed to two contact email addresses, but I haven't
got any response.
aurel
On 6 January 2012 15:07, Aurel W. wrote:
>> So how would a NodeFamily declaration differ from the 3-node MyFamily
>> example above?
> NodeFamily can be specified by a client, if the relays don
12 23:39, Javier Bassi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Aurel W. wrote:
>> Shouldn't this be treated more seriously? There are literally over 100
>> high bandwidth relays, which should specify a family but which don't.
>> If you monitor a client, it is very
Have you tried configuring a client at a different host to use your
bridge and only your bridge as a guard?
aurel
On 20 January 2012 02:35, Steve Snyder wrote:
> New operator of a Tor bridge here. How can I tell that it is being used?
>
> With a regular relay I can look up the stats on TorStatu
Hi,
how much Bandwidth would you use for tor? Anyway, RAM could be the
limitting factor here.
aurel
On 1 February 2012 17:45, Goulven Guillard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am considering setting up a tor relay. However my configuration is not
> powerful and I failed to find precise informations abou
