Re: [tor-relays] We need much more bridges with obfs4 and iat-mode set to 1 or 2..barely can't find any.

2022-08-24 Thread John Csuti via tor-relays
I can dedicate 2 more IP’s from my network to this. You just want it to be obfs4 and iat-mode set to 2? Thanks, John C. > On Aug 24, 2022, at 2:35 AM, elise.tora...@web.de wrote: > >  > As in the title, it took me over an hour to find one - for my security > requirements, the timing and somet

Re: [tor-relays] We need much more bridges with obfs4 and iat-mode set to 1 or 2..barely can't find any.

2022-08-24 Thread meskio
Quoting elise.tora...@web.de (2022-08-23 18:39:08) >As in the title, it took me over an hour to find one - for my security >requirements, the timing and sometimes, packet size obfuscation, is very >important. AFAIK there is no evidence that iat-mode 1 or 2 provides more security, that

Re: [tor-relays] We need much more bridges with obfs4 and iat-mode set to 1 or 2..barely can't find any.

2022-08-24 Thread Fran via tor-relays
Philipp Winter regarding iat mode: >The feature introduces a substantial performance penalty for a dubious >and poorly understood privacy gain. If I were to write an algorithm to >detect obfs4, I wouldn't bother dealing with its flow properties; there >are easier ways to identify the protocol.

[tor-relays] Warn:

2022-08-24 Thread sysmanager7 via tor-relays
I got the below message on my relay #2. It's been in operation for a year and a half. First time I've ever got one of these. 0re7:26:40 [WARN] Your computer is too slow to handle this many circuit creation requests! Please consider using the MaxAdvertisedBandwidth config option or choosing a mo