Hi Gary,
thanks!
> As an aside... Presently, are you using a single, public address with many
> ports or many, public addresses with a single port for your Tor deployments?
> Have you ever considered putting all those Tor instances behind a single,
> public address:port (fingerprint) to creat
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 21:39:27 +0100 (CET)
abuse--- via tor-relays wrote:
> why would that be needed? Linux has a pretty good thread scheduler imo and
> will shuffle loads around as needed.
To improve cache locality, as in modern CPUs L1/L2/L3 cache is partitioned
into various schemes per core or
Hello Tor people, just me chipping in about recent event.
Today, I discovered that somewhere around Dec, 22, all three of my recently
launched bridges have been censored on at least one network (MegaFon Moscow
AS25159). Metrics show a drastic traffic drop in the range of Dec, 21-23 for
all three b
On 12/29/21 15:37, Space Oddity via tor-relays wrote:
Also, I can not rule out that some step in my distribution chain was
compromised -- I gave out these bridges privately to a few friends.
IMO you should not mix private brtdges with those where you delegate the
to distribute the connection i
On 12/29/21 18:45, Toralf Förster wrote:
Said that you should set "PublishServerDescriptor 0" at bridges where
you distribute the connection info yourself.
Or maybe set it to
BridgeDistribution none
to have bridge stats at metrics.org.
--
Toralf
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenP
Hi,
Thanks for running bridges!
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 02:37:48PM +, Space Oddity via tor-relays wrote:
> Hello Tor people, just me chipping in about recent event.
>
> Today, I discovered that somewhere around Dec, 22, all three of my recently
> launched bridges have been censored on at lea
It wasn't a problem for us :) but thanks for the tip.
Also, can confirm Beeline (AS16345) blocks them too. Seems like the
blocking is mostly deployed in mobile carriers atm -- makes sense
to me. Haven't tested with much except these two though.
December 29, 2021 8:53 PM, "Toralf Förster" wrote:
Hi!
I couldn't make the meeting (I retire at the end of January, and should at long
last have time to devote to things Tor). Thanks for posting the notes.
It prompted me to review the draft "expectations for relay operators" document.
It looks very good, though I do have a quibble. The line "Tr
ronqtorrel...@risley.net:
Hi!
I couldn't make the meeting (I retire at the end of January, and should at long
last have time to devote to things Tor). Thanks for posting the notes.
It prompted me to review the draft "expectations for relay operators" document. It looks
very good, though I do
