On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:53:28AM +1000, teor wrote:
> > On 13 Feb 2020, at 22:05, zwiebeln wrote:
> >
> > depended on a network that is 21 percent controlled by a single person
> > that you don't know?
I agree that it's not best.
But I'll turn it around, and point out that many systems (e.g.
Got it. Doing it now.
Thanks a lot.
Leo
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, February 17, 2020 12:41 AM, teor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 17 Feb 2020, at 00:54, LeoR leoj...@protonmail.com wrote:
> > I am waiting for the reponse from the people on the bad-r
There is only a small path between moderation and censorship – to get my
message released after four days is close to…
Your answer Theo is rather technical and doesn't apply really on the underlying
question:
„Would you place your secrets or in worst case make your life depended on a
network
>
> I hope more people do come on board of this discussion now!
>
I dont think that there should be a fixed percentage about how much one
person is allowed to add.
"We need more relays ... but not from you! We don't reject your
fingerprints because we don't think that you are malicious but we don
On 02/17/2020 05:16 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
I don't have anything useful to contribute on the main topic, except to
agree that more relay diversity would be great, and especially more high
capacity exit relays.
But I would like to follow up on a few points.
> But I'll turn it around, and p
> what say the logfile ?
>
Once the consensus diffs are processed the load drops to normal.
After some time without anything noticeable for me in the debug logs the
CPU suddenly jumps to 100% again and stays there till another consensus
diffs are arriving.
Its not as worse as it was the first two
Hi,
> On 18 Feb 2020, at 06:10, Michael Gerstacker
> wrote:
>
> Once the consensus diffs are processed the load drops to normal.
> After some time without anything noticeable for me in the debug logs the CPU
> suddenly jumps to 100% again and stays there till another consensus diffs are
> arr