Re: [tor-relays] Would you place your secrets or in worst case make your life

2020-02-17 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:53:28AM +1000, teor wrote: > > On 13 Feb 2020, at 22:05, zwiebeln wrote: > > > > depended on a network that is 21 percent controlled by a single person > > that you don't know? I agree that it's not best. But I'll turn it around, and point out that many systems (e.g.

Re: [tor-relays] Fingerprint is marked rejected

2020-02-17 Thread LeoR
Got it. Doing it now. Thanks a lot. Leo Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, February 17, 2020 12:41 AM, teor wrote: > Hi, > > > On 17 Feb 2020, at 00:54, LeoR leoj...@protonmail.com wrote: > > I am waiting for the reponse from the people on the bad-r

Re: [tor-relays] Would you place your secrets or in worst case make your life

2020-02-17 Thread zwiebeln
There is only a small path between moderation and censorship – to get my message released after four days is close to… Your answer Theo is rather technical and doesn't apply really on the underlying question: „Would you place your secrets or in worst case make your life depended on a network

Re: [tor-relays] Would you place your secrets or in worst case make your life

2020-02-17 Thread Michael Gerstacker
> > I hope more people do come on board of this discussion now! > I dont think that there should be a fixed percentage about how much one person is allowed to add. "We need more relays ... but not from you! We don't reject your fingerprints because we don't think that you are malicious but we don

Re: [tor-relays] Would you place your secrets or in worst case make your life

2020-02-17 Thread Mirimir
On 02/17/2020 05:16 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote: I don't have anything useful to contribute on the main topic, except to agree that more relay diversity would be great, and especially more high capacity exit relays. But I would like to follow up on a few points. > But I'll turn it around, and p

Re: [tor-relays] 100% CPU load on Windows Server 2019

2020-02-17 Thread Michael Gerstacker
> what say the logfile ? > Once the consensus diffs are processed the load drops to normal. After some time without anything noticeable for me in the debug logs the CPU suddenly jumps to 100% again and stays there till another consensus diffs are arriving. Its not as worse as it was the first two

Re: [tor-relays] 100% CPU load on Windows Server 2019

2020-02-17 Thread teor
Hi, > On 18 Feb 2020, at 06:10, Michael Gerstacker > wrote: > > Once the consensus diffs are processed the load drops to normal. > After some time without anything noticeable for me in the debug logs the CPU > suddenly jumps to 100% again and stays there till another consensus diffs are > arr