Thanks :) It appears to still be running happily this morning. Low
activity, but that's ok.
Interestingly, the fingerprint is now showing the previous relay one. As in
I originally named my relay:
MelbTORbox - 9F19251CEE17B1E05084898D164F0544CCB095DD then when I switched
to a bridge,
MelbTORbridg
This question ties into something I've wondered for a while: Is there a minimum
preferred bandwidth rate for relays? I had done some rough calculations a while
ago that a $5 VPS from something like Digitalocean could provide approximately
2MiB/s while not exceeding the allotted bandwidth.At that
> On July 19, 2019 at 1:44 PM Ben Riley wrote:
>
>
> To follow up my previous email, I found the "Firewall" app and I've
> manually opened 9051 & 8531 in that, and when I tested those via the online
> port checking tools, they are now open.
>
> Restarted TOR (sudo systemctl restart tor) and th
The making of a bridge authority desire is from the observation that here in
South America we haven't any authority and I think this can help tor to improve
the network metrics on South America side. Also maybe in another countries too.
Of course, all the current authorities are good but maybe w
Hi,
i wanted to run my bridge on 443 too but i had the same problem on Raspbian
Buster with Tor 0.4.0.5
I asked Google but choosing a port above 1024 was the only thing that made
it working for me.
Am Fr., 19. Juli 2019 um 11:52 Uhr schrieb :
> > On July 19, 2019 at 6:36 AM Ben Riley wrote:
> >
2MB * 60 * 60 * 24 *31 = 5356800 megz
$5 will give you 1 TB with DigitalOcean ...
This will not work out.
I would recommend pushing Italy a little. There are datacenter with no traffic
limits.
> On 20. Jul 2019, at 01:13, friendlyexitnode
> wrote:
>
> This question ties into something I've
