[tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

Hi Folks.   I am looking for a good hoster to run 1-2 EXITs. A year ago i had a good running exit on scaleway, but it was shut down due to some complaints. Time to restart this project - so any ideas which hoster to chose? Close to this topic: any experiences with AliCloud?     best regards,

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

I use Trabia. Is cheap, unlimited bandwidth and they are very for friendly. There are a lot of exit relays on trabia; but I think that would be better to diversify the providers. I never received any complaint though I have a quite open exit policy. i think that they manage the complaints. Urdn

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

Urdn.com.ua, I'm sorry, I mean unlimited bandwidth Il 15 febbraio 2019 09:59:13 CET, dns1...@riseup.net ha scritto: >I use Trabia. Is cheap, unlimited bandwidth and they are very for >friendly. There are a lot of exit relays on trabia; but I think that >would be better to diversify the providers.

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

> > It would be interesting to know some statistics, and to know which are the > most used providers for exit relay. > > > Cheers > https://nusenu.github.io/OrNetStats/asnameshare Markus ___ t

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

thanks for this quick answer!   urdn looks very very neat :D Plain HTML landing site! about keyweb - restricted to 80/443 ? diversity would be a good point - thats why i am asking for providers in asian continents for example :)   Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2019 um 10:00 Uhr Von: dns1...

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy I use the second in the list. Il 15 febbraio 2019 10:05:48 CET, Volker Mink ha scritto: >___ >tor-relays mailing list >tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >https://lists.torproject.org/cgi

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

I contacted keyweb and they allow exit policy with restricted policy. Maybe more open too than 53, 80 and 443 Il 15 febbraio 2019 10:14:02 CET, dns1...@riseup.net ha scritto: >https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy > >I use the second in the list. > >Il 15 febbraio 20

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

keyweb looks like an interesting hoster to start over with. But regarding diversity i am also looking for hosters from outer europe. URDN is also europe, sweden     Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2019 um 10:15 Uhr Von: dns1...@riseup.net An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relay

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

dns1...@riseup.net: > It would be interesting to know some statistics, and to know which > are the most used providers for exit relay. you can use https://atlas.torproject.org (yes this is the old domain but less to type ;) group by AS and sort by exit probability to get the top list of exit AS

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

`https://atlas.torproject.org (yes this is the old domain but less to type ;)` seems a lot longer than `metrics.torproject.org` to me :p On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:37 PM nusenu wrote: > > > dns1...@riseup.net: > > It would be interesting to know some statistics, and to know which > > are the most

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

LOL Anyway, thanks nusenu, I think I'll take a look to ASN, though is a bit overwhelming for me. I was hoping for some statistics already done. Cheers Il 15 febbraio 2019 19:23:19 CET, Charly Ghislain ha scritto: >`https://atlas.torproject.org (yes this is the old domain but less to >type >

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

dns1...@riseup.net: > Anyway, thanks nusenu, I think I'll take a look to ASN, though is a > bit overwhelming for me. Do you mean Relay Search is showing to many columns? https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#aggregate/as there is an open ticket about that but it is unlikely to materialize http

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

I though that it was more difficult because the high number of ASs, but I didn't take a look. Now I see that is very clear. Thanks Il 15 febbraio 2019 20:42:00 CET, nusenu ha scritto: > > >dns1...@riseup.net: >> Anyway, thanks nusenu, I think I'll take a look to ASN, though is a >> bit overwhe

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

Reminder, as many times before... Anyone can pay cheap $ to pack yet more nodes on already saturated providers. This does nothing for diversity against NSA, GCHQ, BND, RCMP, AFP, FVEY+, etc... who all share fibre taps, and Sybils, all who trivially exploit tor. The simple plausibilty of such is al

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

As regards Linux box I would say one thing: if you are worried about NSA etc.. how you could use operating systems that are not enterly free software? If your operating system contains binary blob, if your mother board hasn't a free boot loader how do you know that it has not a backdoor or some

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

On 2/15/19, dns1...@riseup.net wrote: > As regards Linux box I would say one thing: if you are worried about NSA > etc.. how you could use operating systems that are not enterly free > software? If your > operating system contains binary blob That can be avoided with some OS, typically stringent

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

"That can be avoided with some OS, typically stringent against them like OpenBSD" As far as I know, those distributions include non free firmwares, which, potentially or maybe not, could contain some backdoors. I don't want to preach no one, but for me is a ethical, moral question. I want to a

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

> > I don't want to preach no one, but for me is a ethical, moral question. I > want to avoid operating systems that haven't a clear policy about free > software. It is my opinion that I am not the only one here, and that this > explains the "Debian monoculture". > > Maybe I'm wrong. Debian

Re: [tor-relays] [tor-exit] good node providers

On 2/16/19, dns1...@riseup.net wrote: > As far as I know, those distributions include non free firmwares, which, > potentially or maybe not, could contain some backdoors. > > I don't want to preach no one, but for me is a ethical, moral question. I > want to avoid operating systems that haven't a