> On 29 Jun 2017, at 16:03, Vort wrote:
>
> In order to estimate the effect of relays unstuck
> measures, I have made some graphs.
>
> The first graph shows how many relays in the network have
> weight < 20 (in percents, relative to total measured, valid and running
> count):
>
> https://s8
> We tried to unstick some of the lowest bandwidth relays (below 1000),
You mean 0..1 weight (1 KiB/s and lower)?
They may be really bad.
I guess, that good test range is 10..20 (or 5..30).
> and our initial results are:
> * most (15) of relays we tried are actually very slow, or down,
> * some
Good morning,
I have brought two new exit nodes online, ephesys0 and ephesys1 . Both are
registering on atlas, and both have picked up the exit flag, so I'm
providing notice for those who want to take a look at them and provide
feedback on their configuration.
Make your day great,
Isaac,
Hi,
I'd first off like to thank you for running your exits.
On Jun 29, 2017 3:25 AM, "Tor Node Admin @ SechsNullDrei.org" <
t...@sechsnulldrei.org> wrote:
I have brought two new exit nodes online, ephesys0 and ephesys1 . Both are
registering on atlas, and both have picked up the exit flag, so I
Hi,
Torix:
After running my first relay for a month at a RelayBandwidthRate of
200 KBytes/300KBytes burst, averaging 3-5 GiB per day, I upped it to
300KBytes/400 burst on the 22nd and reloaded the torrc. I don't know
why I am now pushing so much more through this simple middle relay. My
flags ha
Good morning Dakota,
Thank you for the suggestion. I have added MyFamily records to the torrc file
on each of the three nodes. It likely doesn’t matter on the middle relay, but
it can’t hurt.
Thank you for your email,
Isaac, t...@sechsnulldrei.org
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relay
I have access to a fast internet connection. This connection only have
ipv6 IP and i can access the IPv4 network over the ISPs 6to4 bridge.
So there are already many users using one single IPv4 address at this ISP.
Sadly its technical as far as i understood at the moment not possible to
run a I
Hi Isaac,
On 29/06/17 13:24, Tor Node Admin @ SechsNullDrei.org wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion. I have added MyFamily records to the
> torrc file on each of the three nodes. It likely doesn’t matter on the
> middle relay, but it can’t hurt.
On the contrary, it's vitally important to have
I have a small Tor exit relay (VPS) running at +90% CPU capacity.
Memory usage is negligible. I am unable to launch ARM as the single CPU
cannot process both Tor and arm. Traffic is mostly high for a small node.
I have CPUsNum set at 2 in my torrc from its original setup. However,
pidstat 5
> On 29 Jun 2017, at 23:55, Fof582 wrote:
>
> I have access to a fast internet connection. This connection only have
> ipv6 IP and i can access the IPv4 network over the ISPs 6to4 bridge.
>
> So there are already many users using one single IPv4 address at this ISP.
It is not a good idea to ru
> On 30 Jun 2017, at 04:52, Arisbe wrote:
>
> I have a small Tor exit relay (VPS) running at +90% CPU capacity.
What version of Tor?
Has this only happened recently?
Did you upgrade your Tor version?
Are you running a caching DNS server?
> Memory usage is negligible. I am unable to launch AR
Thank you Tim for your response. I am running Tor 0.2.9.11 on
ubuntu linux. I have not implemented a caching DNS at this point
and may not do so. I'm not sure how this problem progressed but I
notices that arm was slower and more difficult to call up in
recent
Sorry, I didn't read on
No CPU masking in place. Then too, its hard to tell if this is 2
CPUs or hyperthreading.
As you suggest, I will try commenting out CPUsNum 2.
Sorry about two emails.
Larry B
On 6/29/2017 6:11 PM, teor wrote:
> We don't know how to give users good anonymity when some relays can't
> connect to other relays. This would happen if we allowed IPv4-only relays
> and IPv6-only relays in the same network.
With "IPv6 only" relays available in the consensus the answer may be...
when their count is the same as wh
grarpamp wrote:
> > We don't know how to give users good anonymity when some relays can't
> > connect to other relays. This would happen if we allowed IPv4-only relays
> > and IPv6-only relays in the same network.
>
> With "IPv6 only" relays available in the consensus the answer may be...
> when
15 matches
Mail list logo
