Hi,
(rather new relay operator here, so excuse me, if this is a dumb question)
I just saw this (https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html) graph,
which shows that the advertised relay bandwidth in the whole network is
more than double the actually used bandwidth. While it's certainly nice
to
On 2016-09-02 at 13:18, jensm1 wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> (rather new relay operator here, so excuse me, if this is a dumb question)
>
> I just saw this (https://metrics.torproject.org/bandwidth.html) graph,
> which shows that the advertised relay bandwidth in the whole network is
> more than double the
I just multiplied my BandwidthRate with a bit for my exit.
//Spid
On 02/09/16 02:28, Tristan wrote:
> Is the Tor strike today? Because I just set up a second instance on my
> relay to get the most out of its bandwidth.
>
> Oops 😏
>
>
>
> ___
> tor-
Good job, thank you!
> Am 02.09.2016 um 17:26 schrieb D.S. Ljungmark :
>
> I just multiplied my BandwidthRate with a bit for my exit.
>
> //Spid
>
>
>> On 02/09/16 02:28, Tristan wrote:
>> Is the Tor strike today? Because I just set up a second instance on my
>> relay to get the most out of it
Looking at the advertised bandwidth vs bandwidth history from Tor
Metrics[1], it appears that guard relays see much more traffic than exit
relays. I think it might be partially because guard-only, guard-middle and
guard-exits aren't separated, but would it really skew the numbers that
much?
[1]htt
But hidden service traffic makes up about 0.01% of Tor traffic.
Total is about 75Gb/s: http://rougmnvswfsmd4dq.onion/bandwidth.html
Hidden services are about 900Mb/s:
http://rougmnvswfsmd4dq.onion/hidserv-rend-relayed-cells.html
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Green Dream
wrote:
> Don't forge
Don't forget that some traffic enters through guards but lands on
hidden services, skipping Exits.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Michael Armbruster wrote:
> On 2016-09-02 at 13:18, jensm1 wrote:
>> which shows that the advertised relay bandwidth in the whole network is
>> more than double the actually used bandwidth. While it's certainly nice
>> to have a bit of breathing space to absorb load
> On 3 Sep 2016, at 05:55, grarpamp wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:30 AM, Michael Armbruster wrote:
>> On 2016-09-02 at 13:18, jensm1 wrote:
>>> which shows that the advertised relay bandwidth in the whole network is
>>> more than double the actually used bandwidth. While it's certainly ni
