Re: [tor-relays] is explicit DirPort needed anymore under Tor 0.2.8.6?

2016-08-08 Thread teor
> On 3 Aug 2016, at 10:29, teor wrote: > > Clients on 0.2.7.6 and earlier still use the IPv4 DirPort. > (Tor Browser is still 0.2.7.6, and apps in general may take some time to > upgrade.) > > Authorities on0.2.7.6 and earlier will only assign the HSDir flag to relays > with an IPv4 DirPort.

Re: [tor-relays] [PATCH] debian package upgrade restart issue

2016-08-08 Thread nusenu
>> When upgrading, all running tor instances are stopped (not restarted, as >> expected) > > This might be your root-cause as well? > > https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/issues/72 > > I'm generating instance names based on IP addresses_ORport (so they > contain "." and "_") and are ther

Re: [tor-relays] [PATCH] debian package upgrade restart issue

2016-08-08 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016, nusenu wrote: > >> When upgrading, all running tor instances are stopped (not restarted, as > >> expected) > > > > This might be your root-cause as well? > > > > https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-relayor/issues/72 > > > > I'm generating instance names based on IP addresses

Re: [tor-relays] [PATCH] debian package upgrade restart issue

2016-08-08 Thread nusenu
>>> I'm generating instance names based on IP addresses_ORport (so they >>> contain "." and "_") and are therefore filtered by the generator. >>> >>> Is it acceptable to add "." and "_" to the whitelist? >>> >>> (patches attached) >> >> Based on the output of 'systemd-escape' (a tool that escapes s

[tor-relays] Unsubscribe

2016-08-08 Thread Jeremy
A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n xmpp: teor at torproject dot org -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with Ope