Re: [tor-relays] suspicious "Relay127001" relays

2016-07-03 Thread nusenu
some new ones: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.onion-routing.ornetradar/1468 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread pa011
Am 02.07.2016 um 20:14 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > On Sat, 02 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > >> Ok - "Log notice file /var/log/tor/notices2.log" removed from >> torrc, but that doesn’t influence the error message from systemctl >> in no way. >> >> Still not working ! > > Please try to provide at leas

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread Peter Palfrader
Let me read this for you. On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]: Jul 03 12:09:27.590 [notice] Opening OR listener on > 0.0.0.0:443 > Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]: Jul 03 12:09:27.590 [warn] Could not bind to > 0.0.0.0:443: Address already in use. Is Tor already running? > Jul

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread pa011
Am 03.07.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > Let me read this for you. > > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > >> Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]: Jul 03 12:09:27.590 [notice] Opening OR listener >> on 0.0.0.0:443 >> Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]: Jul 03 12:09:27.590 [warn] Could not bind to >> 0.0.

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > > Am 03.07.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > > Let me read this for you. > > > > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > > > >> Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]: Jul 03 12:09:27.590 [notice] Opening OR listener > >> on 0.0.0.0:443 > >> Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]: J

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread pa011
Am 03.07.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > >> >> Am 03.07.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Peter Palfrader: >>> Let me read this for you. >>> >>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: >>> Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]: Jul 03 12:09:27.590 [notice] Opening OR listener

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
Op 03/07/16 om 13:52 schreef pa011: > > > Am 03.07.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Peter Palfrader: >> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 03.07.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Peter Palfrader: Let me read this for you. On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > Jul 3 12:09:27 tor[4532]:

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > > > Am 03.07.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > > > >> > >> Am 03.07.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > >>> Let me read this for you. > >>> > >>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > >>> > Jul 3 12:09:27 t

[tor-relays] dns request capitalization, tor and unbound

2016-07-03 Thread ajs124
Hey, I recently started running my first two exit relays. Since it was mentioned on the mailing list a while back and seem like a reasonable thing to do, I installed and configured unbound. Afterwards, I noticed that most if not all the DNS request are randomly capitalized. Does this impact un

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread pa011
Am 03.07.2016 um 14:28 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: > >> >> >> Am 03.07.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Peter Palfrader: >>> On Sun, 03 Jul 2016, pa011 wrote: >>> Am 03.07.2016 um 13:03 schrieb Peter Palfrader: > Let me read this for you. > > On Sun, 0

Re: [tor-relays] dns request capitalization, tor and unbound

2016-07-03 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:25 AM, ajs124 wrote: > > Afterwards, I noticed that most if not all the DNS request are randomly > capitalized. > Does this impact unbound's caching ability? My cache hit/miss ratio is around > 1/5. This is "0x20 encoding", see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vixie-dn

Re: [tor-relays] dns request capitalization, tor and unbound

2016-07-03 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
Op 03/07/16 om 15:51 schreef Zack Weinberg: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:25 AM, ajs124 wrote: >> >> Afterwards, I noticed that most if not all the DNS request are randomly >> capitalized. >> Does this impact unbound's caching ability? My cache hit/miss ratio is >> around 1/5. > > This is "0x20 en

Re: [tor-relays] dns request capitalization, tor and unbound

2016-07-03 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/03/2016 03:51 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > However, I personally think it is inappropriate to run a DNS cache > on an exit node, because that preserves a record on the exit node > of what people are using it for. IMO both statement aren't correct

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread nusenu
> Still open: > > "arm -i 9052" - is asking for a Controller password while I have a > HashedControlPassword in place ? if you configure tor to require a password for controlport access (that what HashedControlPassword is for), you will be asked for a password (expected behavior). https://www.

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread pa011
Am 03.07.2016 um 17:06 schrieb nusenu: >> Still open: >> >> "arm -i 9052" - is asking for a Controller password while I have a >> HashedControlPassword in place ? > > if you configure tor to require a password for controlport access (that > what HashedControlPassword is for), you will be asked

Re: [tor-relays] More than one instance with Debian Jessie

2016-07-03 Thread pa011
> Ok - very sorry - I foolished myself -this last issue is solved :-) !! Thank you nusenu for your help !! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/

Re: [tor-relays] arm and non-default control port

2016-07-03 Thread Green Dream
>> don't run arm as the tor user > Does this apply only to Debian, or Linux in general? Linux in general. It's really just a matter of giving the process the least amount of privilege necessary. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.o