Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

2016-05-07 Thread nusenu
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41edfd74b1cfbe83ded/raw/8cca2f354cbad259c5d5717f3ea2b51c9e51f391/2016-04-28--05-06_84_exits.txt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.t

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

2016-05-07 Thread Tristan
Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP. On May 7, 2016 2:32 AM, "nusenu" wrote: > > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41edfd74b1cfbe83ded/raw/8cca2f354cbad259c5d5717f3ea2b51c9e51f391/2016-04-28--05-

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

2016-05-07 Thread Xza
Maybe botnet ? On May 7, 2016 2:46:31 PM GMT+02:00, Tristan wrote: >Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a >Tor >relay of any kind is against their AUP. >On May 7, 2016 2:32 AM, "nusenu" wrote: > >> >> >> >https://gist.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/0c8ec0852a07b41

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

2016-05-07 Thread Yawning Angel
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 Tristan wrote: > Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running > a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP. That's news to me. https://www.digitalocean.com/legal/terms/ Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, whe

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

2016-05-07 Thread Tristan
Apologies, I must be thinking of a different service. I thought it was DO, but I don't recognize the layout of the website. On May 7, 2016 1:29 PM, "Yawning Angel" wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 > Tristan wrote: > > > Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Runn

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..)

2016-05-07 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/07/2016 08:27 PM, Yawning Angel wrote: > Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, where > is this mentioned? > from https://www.digitalocean.com/legal/terms/ : Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscribers of Grandfathered Ac

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..)

2016-05-07 Thread Yawning Angel
On Sat, 7 May 2016 20:38:08 +0200 Toralf Förster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 05/07/2016 08:27 PM, Yawning Angel wrote: > > Apart from accounts that have grandfathered free bandwidth, where > > is this mentioned? > > > from https://www.digitalocean.com/le

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

2016-05-07 Thread mick
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 Tristan allegedly wrote: > Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running > a Tor relay of any kind is against their AUP. Not so. I've been running a tor node on DO for three years now. They know it, they are happy, so am I. Mic ---

Re: [tor-relays] 84 exits (growing..) (was: 68 new exits)

2016-05-07 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Sat, 7 May 2016 07:46:31 -0500 Tristan wrote: > Strange that some of the relays are running on Digital Ocean. Running a Tor > relay of any kind is against their AUP. That's like... asking why bank robbers don't stop at traffic lights. I mean this looks like an attempt to capture people's (in