So this is why 114 Tor exit nodes are apparently operating from Potwin,
Kansas! Figured it was a digital artifact. The article doesn't mention
Tor itself, but the nominal fount really jumps out on TorFlow.
http://fusion.net/story/287592/internet-mapping-glitch-kansas-farm/
https://torflow.unchart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I've just moved my Tor relay installation from my alix1.c embedded
system (500Mhz CPU with 256Mb ram) which was able to offer only 4Mbps
(100% CPU utilization) to a new Raspberry Pi3 (quad-core 1.2Ghz 64-bit
cpu with 1 GB ram). Some days ago I've
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:52:20 +
fr33d0m4all wrote:
> I've just moved my Tor relay installation from my alix1.c embedded
> system (500Mhz CPU with 256Mb ram) which was able to offer only 4Mbps
> (100% CPU utilization) to a new Raspberry Pi3 (quad-core 1.2Ghz 64-bit
> cpu with 1 GB ram). Some day
Got my first relay running for 4 days now :D
-KAW
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Got my first relay running for 4 days now :D
-KAW
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Congratulation - I know that feeling very well ...one after another :-)
Am 10.04.2016 um 21:08 schrieb KAW:
> Got my first relay running for 4 days now :D
>
>
> -KAW
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lis
On 10/04/2016 20:28, Yawning Angel wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:52:20 +
fr33d0m4all wrote:
I've just moved my Tor relay installation from my alix1.c embedded
system (500Mhz CPU with 256Mb ram) which was able to offer only 4Mbps
(100% CPU utilization) to a new Raspberry Pi3 (quad-core 1.2Gh
Which cheap unmetered brandwith hosting do you recommend me, I prefer using
bitcoins as method of payment.
Thanks
Sent from ProtonMail mobile___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
I use Flokinet (https://flokinet.is). They are pretty awesome and their
starting VPS is unmetered, although you will have to throttle your relay to
around 100 Mbps.
It costs 10 euros/month.
They are completely okay with Tor exits, relays, and bridges.
--
Michael Canning
President - CaveFox Tel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> From: Yawning Angel To:
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] First
> (positive) experiences with a Tor Relay on Raspberry Pi3
> Message-ID: <20160410182830.2be8c...@schwanenlied.me> Content-Type:
> text/plain; charset="utf-
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 21:48:06 +
fr33d0m4all wrote:
[snip]
> Thank you very much Yawning for the news, I didn't know about that!
> I'm running stable 0.2.7.6 from the Jessie repo, I hope the new
> ARMv8-AES-enabled version will be out "soon" in the repo (but I don't
> think it will happen soon
I believe I now understand the cause of exit relay failure when
Unbound is the resolver and GoDaddy null-routes the exit.
Both to prevent this DOS from taking out your relay if Unbound is
running and to maximize DNS performance:
with a local instance of Unbound running /etc/resolv.conf should loo
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 22:09:37 +0100 (BST)
Michael Canning wrote:
> I use Flokinet (https://flokinet.is). They are pretty awesome and
> their starting VPS is unmetered, although you will have to throttle
> your relay to around 100 Mbps.
While I use and generally like flokinet, their VPS offerings
ount really jumps out on TorFlow.
>
> http://fusion.net/story/287592/internet-mapping-glitch-kansas-farm/
>
> https://torflow.uncharted.software/
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: 0xDD79757F.asc
> Type: application/pgp-keys
>
> On 11 Apr 2016, at 16:19, Milica Đekić wrote:
>
> Would Tor relays work in a dynamic manner switching from one to another
> from time to time? I am at the beginning of my research regarding a Tor
> network and I could use some support from you, guys. I would read a bit
> about entry, middle an
15 matches
Mail list logo
