By setting "DirPort: 0" the relays wont get flaged as Dir. So: Should
be set to 0 in this case, no?
Am Sonntag, 20. März 2016 02:54 schrieb Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
:
On 9 Mar 2016, at 09:29, nusenu wrote:
- maybe run without DirPort so you do not become HSDir for to many
HSes
Hmm
> On 21 Mar 2016, at 21:32, tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote:
>
> By setting "DirPort: 0" the relays wont get flaged as Dir. So: Should be set
> to 0 in this case, no?
In 0.2.8, every relay is potentially a hidden service directory and a directory
mirror.
Clients tunnel directory con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
> In 0.2.8, every relay is potentially a hidden service directory and
> a directory mirror.
But with this configuration :
# 20 TB/month: echo "20 * 1024^4 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024^2" | bc
# == 8017
#
#BandwidthRate 8 MB
> On 22 Mar 2016, at 04:22, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
> > In 0.2.8, every relay is potentially a hidden service directory and
> > a directory mirror.
> But with this configuration :
>
> # 20 TB/month: echo "20 * 1024^4 / 31 / 24 / 60 / 60 / 1024^2" | b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
> * if the AccountingRule is not "in".
Thx for the explanation - the above I do not understood - may I ask what "in"
means in detail ?
- --
Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
> * if the AccountingRule is not "in".
Ah,
AccountingRule in
was meant. I did not set that config option in the past due to the impact of
network-in-attacks as is seen in [1].
Because I do have to pay just for outg
> On 22 Mar 2016, at 08:14, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
> > * if the AccountingRule is not "in".
> Ah,
> AccountingRule in
> was meant. I did not set that config option in the past due to the impact of
> network-in-attacks as is seen in [1].
>
> B
