Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015 08:57 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner
:
Have you restarted
Tor after you made changes?
Yes. After ive done changes i always restart the Server hard. Tor is
Running As Daemon so hours after restart i just do a check at
atlas.torproject.org if its up&running
Looks like you got more than you paid for.
On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on a new VPS relay..
> That's pathetic. Th
>> Doesn't Arm look for 9051?
>
> By default, but it can be any port you edit into the rc.
Apologies for the rudimentary question but did you try 'arm
--interface 9051'? I assume by 'edit into the rc' that you've changed
the default via the armrc but if I was in your shoes I'd give the
interface a
>>> Doesn't Arm look for 9051?
>>
>> By default, but it can be any port you edit into the rc.
>
> Apologies for the rudimentary question but did you try 'arm
> --interface 9051'? I assume by 'edit into the rc' that you've changed
> the default via the armrc but if I was in your shoes I'd give the
>
On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:29:58 -0800
AMuse allegedly wrote:
>
>
> Looks like you got more than you paid for.
>
> On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> > fairly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote:
> Looks like you got more than you paid for.
>
>
>
> On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
>
> That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on
He is right.
Do you want help now or what?
Am 04.12.2015 um 19:21 schrieb Kurt Besig:
> On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote:
> > Looks like you got more than you paid for.
>
>
>
> > On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
>
> > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> > fair
Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in anything
resembling a nice or appreciative tone, I'd have helped you. I'm on too
many email lists and things get buried sometimes, so I didn't see any of
your original requests. I had a few minutes today where I could have
chatted with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/4/2015 10:33 AM, AMuse wrote:
> Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in
> anything resembling a nice or appreciative tone, I'd have helped
> you. I'm on too many email lists and things get buried sometimes,
> so I didn't see
I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of running my
first relay wore off.
It is fun to use and useful to beginners, though. :-) No disrespect to
Do you got an alternative for arm? i use munin too, for connections etc.
Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
arm a needless, breakable complication
On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 20:15:18 +0100
David Schulz wrote:
> Do you got an alternative for arm? i use munin too, for connections etc.
"For connections"? Why do you ever need to view the actual connections from/to
your relay.
As alternatives to arm, when looking after a relay that's spinning up, I u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
He probably means viewing the total number of connections to and from
the relay. This is what I use munin for too: the total number of
connections and the total amount of incoming and outgoing bandwidth.
I use arm too to make me feel comfortable at
write that sort of retort privately
-Original Message-From: tor-am...@foofus.comSent: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:33:03 -0800To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable
Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in anything resembling a nice or app
Are you aware that you just wrote "write that sort of retort privately"
by not, yourself, writing your retort privately?
As to why I published my original reply to the list, it's because I felt
that other lurkers who are perhaps newbies to how open source support
listservs work might also bene
David Schulz wrote:
> Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
> >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
> >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
> >arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of running my
> >first relay w
Michael McConville wrote:
> David Schulz wrote:
> > Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
> > >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
> > >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I
> > >found arm a needless, breakable complication after the
No worries,Are you sure the user or group is debian_tor?The default is debian-tor in Ubuntu.If that isn't the problem,First I would be sure tor is actually running.toportop -u debian-torThe second will show if tor is actually running as the user you think it is.If it is, then see if it is listenin
For what it's worth process permissions aren't at play here. Arm is
failing to talk with the control port - permissions could cause us to
be unable to read the authentication cookie, but that would be a
different message.
Cheers! -Damian
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Manager Bahia del Sol LLC
19 matches
Mail list logo
