You might check for existing relays in their system.
This Robtex seems to have much of their network,
which they appear to lease from other providers:
https://www.robtex.com/en/advisory/dns/cr/crservers/
And while they advertise many network
blocks, it appears it's all slices
of just a few large
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm happy - my Tor relay says it's advertised bandwith is 1.1MB/s and
it is. Quote from Atlas:
Bandwidth rate: 1073.74 MB/s
Bandwidth burst: 2147.48 MB/s
Observed bandwidth: 1.11 MB/s
Hopefully if I can keep this up, I'll be qualifying for a shirt
Mega bits perhaps?
Mb rather than MB
8-)
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I think so.
Also, is there a way to keep the fingerprint for my relay the same,
just in case I have to move computers? If so, what files do I have to
move?
On 07/09/2015 15:54, I wrote:
> Mega bits perhaps? Mb rather than MB 8-)
>
>
>
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#UpgradeOrMove
I want to upgrade/move my relay. How do I keep the same key?
When upgrading your Tor relay, or running it on a different computer,
the important part is to keep the same identity key (stored in
"keys/secret_id_key" in your DataDirectory)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thank you! :D
On 07/09/2015 16:50, tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#UpgradeOrMove I want to
> upgrade/move my relay. How do I keep the same key?
>
> When upgrading your Tor relay, or running
This is curious: Appears a large number of Tor
client-bots have set
UseEntryGuards 0
>From current relays that have never had the guard flag:
extra-info moep DA8C1123CDB3ACD3B36CD7E7CEFBEA685DED2276
entry-ips us=360,de=296,fr=232,it=192,es=160,jp=104,ru=104,br=96,ir=96. . .
extra-info moto
On 09/07/2015 12:17 AM, s7r wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this. But why do you want to run your bridge instance among
> the same Tor daemon as the one handling Tor Browser?
I don't, necessarily. I should explain that I've been running a
long-term relay on my 32-bit Ubuntu box (Anosognosia:
6473E3
On 09/07/2015 12:18 AM, Billy Humphreys wrote:
> Well, people suggest that, unless you give <100KB/s, you should run a
> relay, not a bridge, as more relays are used (and we have Tor weather
> and such). You should be using Tor's daemon (apt-get install tor
> tor-arm) for the relay or bridge itse
On 09/07/2015 01:07 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
> On 09/07/2015 12:18 AM, Billy Humphreys wrote:
>> Well, people suggest that, unless you give <100KB/s, you should
>> run a relay, not a bridge, as more relays are used (and we have
>> Tor weather and such). You should be using Tor's daemon (apt-get
>
On 09/07/2015 12:25 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Well, it depends what you put in the torrc file. I assume you edited
> the torrc file that's inside the tor browser directory tree? Perhaps
> you did something there that it didn't like. Maybe you followed one of
> the instructions that suggested
On 09/07/2015 11:17 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On 09/07/2015 01:07 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
>> On 09/07/2015 12:18 AM, Billy Humphreys wrote:
>>> Well, people suggest that, unless you give <100KB/s, you should
>>> run a relay, not a bridge, as more relays are used (and we have
>>> Tor weather a
(The OSHER presentation is actually tomorrow. Duh!)
0xDD79757F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
When I asked my reverse DNS to be added for my Tor exit relay, they
said that Tor nodes were disallowed due to the ToS, but didn't stop me.
I messaged back a few times (in normal UK time, 3AM over there) and I
got this reply:
'Hey there
Thank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
When I asked my reverse DNS to be added for my Tor exit relay, they
said that Tor nodes were disallowed due to the ToS, but didn't stop me.
I messaged back a few times (in normal UK time, 3AM over there) and I
got this reply:
'Hey there
Thank
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:11:59AM -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> So I'm left thinking that 95% or more of the
> bandwidth consumption and client count is from
> crusty old botnet bots running ancient versions
> of the Tor daemon.
Client count (for non guards), yes I think that's a f
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 10:30:38AM -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> This is curious: Appears a large number of Tor
> client-bots have set
>
> UseEntryGuards 0
>
> From current relays that have never had the guard flag:
>
> extra-info moep DA8C1123CDB3ACD3B36CD7E7CEFBEA685DED2276
17 matches
Mail list logo
