Would be interesting to have an outdate-consensus handling deprecated
relays just for statistics or maybe also to set them all to flagged as
bad or throttle them somehow?
Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015 17:11 schrieb
starlight.201...@binnacle.cx:
My relay says it receives about 50k v1/v2/v3
Just thoughts: To throttle how about assign twisted consensus weight to
outdated versions? Highest consensus weight to slowest relays and vice
versa? Wouldnt they overload/throttle themselfes nicely?
Am Sonntag, 23. August 2015 10:24 schrieb
tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com:
Would be
At 11:11 8/19/2015 -0400, you wrote:
>But all that bot traffic creates a lot
>of statistical "background noise," and
>so may be providing a service in making
>it more difficult for advanced adversaries
>to perform traffic correlation analysis.
>
>Thoughts anyone?
Here is one excellent reason to lo
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:45 PM, wrote:
>
> So the more garbage flung around by bots,
> the better (as long as Tor remains usable),
> as it increases the difficulty and cost of
> storing Tor traffic by orders-of-magnitude.
>
This may not be in the interest of tax-paying Americans, considering
t
On 2015-08-13 01:40, Mike Perry wrote:
As such, I still look forward to hearing from someone who has worked at
an ISP/University/etc where this is actually practiced. What is in
*those* logs?
I deal with two flow recording practices and resulting records retention at
work.
The first is at the
