On 8/3/15, Yawning Angel wrote:
> ...
> Hm, doesn't running good relays on Windows (especially high capacity
> ones) require that we finish off the IOCP related work?
yes. this makes high performing Windows relays much more difficult in practice.
there are pages written years back in tor-talk, t
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> As such, I was only able to discover that its default inactive/idle
> timoeut is 30s. I couldn't find a range.
> What I really need now is any examples of common routers that have a
> default inactive/idle timeout below 10s, or allow you to set
On 8/21/15, Mike Perry wrote:
...
>> For those into researching other flow capabilities...
>> There are also some probes in OS kernels and
>> some other opensource taps, they're not as well known
>> or utilized as nProbe.
>> Other large hardware vendors include Brocade, Avaya,
>> Huawei, and Alcat
++ 21/08/15 12:21 + - Sharif Olorin:
>
>Could you estimate the number of abuse complaints you receive, or the
>amount of time you need to spend responding to them - and how many
>exits for how long, for context? I'd like to operate an exit node[0],
With the experience of running a couple of ex
My relay says it receives about 50k v1/v2/v3
connections each day to the 60k v4
connections that come in.
"Entry-ips" says it has about 35k guard-
clients. Blutmagie says there are no
pre-0.2.4 relays talking anything other
than v4.
So I'm left thinking that 95% or more of the
bandwidth consumpt
