Re: [tor-relays] Guidelines for lifetime of a bridge?

2015-08-17 Thread Tim Sammut
Thank you, Isis and Tom. On 08/17/2015 02:04 AM, isis wrote: > Since you've seen the traffic drop off, you might want to consider changing IP > addresses. Also, if you aren't already, you might want to consider running > the > obfs4 Pluggable Transport if you can, since it is direct probing resi

Re: [tor-relays] Guidelines for lifetime of a bridge?

2015-08-17 Thread Yawning Angel
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:13:21 +0100 Tim Sammut wrote: > With possible config changes in mind, is it best to use ports 80 and > 443 for pluggable transports? It'd be nice if more bridges used ports < 1024, yes. > IIRC the bridgeDB prefers to hand out at least one bridge with port 80 > or 443 open.

[tor-relays] No guard flag?

2015-08-17 Thread Tor Tor
Hi, I'm running a relay node [1], and it's been up for a few days over 68 days. I was thinking it would get the guard flag around then. It has yet to get the flag or have non-zero guard probability. Any idea why that is? Or what I could do to get it to be a guard? 1) https://globe.torproject.org/#

Re: [tor-relays] No guard flag?

2015-08-17 Thread Pascal Terjan
On 17 August 2015 at 21:23, Tor Tor wrote: > Hi, > I'm running a relay node [1], and it's been up for a few days over 68 days. > I was thinking it would get the guard flag around then. It has yet to get > the flag or have non-zero guard probability. Any idea why that is? Or what I > could do to ge