Subject says it.
Thought it was strange that its measurement
of my relay has not been moving. Pulled the
vote history and grep'ed a dozen relay
measurements and none of them have changed.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
http
Interesting. Thanks starlight for the head's up! I'm not aware of any
known issues with longclaw right now so looping in its operator.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:09 AM, wrote:
> Subject says it.
>
> Thought it was strange that its measurement
> of my relay has not been moving. Pulled the
> vot
Hello,
If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay and want
it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple of weeks to a
month for the whole "unmeasured relay/measured/guard/stable" cycle to
complete) or if you are having trouble with your current relay being
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 23:40:10 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay
> and want it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple
> of weeks to a month for the whole "unmeasured
> relay/measured/guard/stable" cycle to complete) o
Roman Mamedov transcribed 3.6K bytes:
> Hello,
>
> If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay and want
> it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple of weeks to a
> month for the whole "unmeasured relay/measured/guard/stable" cycle to
> complete) or if yo
Realized not everyone monitors this
list so I opened a Trac ticket:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16667
At 11:19 7/25/2015 -0700, you wrote:
>Interesting. Thanks starlight for the head's up! I'm not
>aware of any known issues with longclaw right now
>so looping in its operator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/25/2015 08:40 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If anyone is planning to spin up a new VM or dedi to run a Tor relay and want
> it to be put instantly into good use (without wasting couple of weeks to a
> month for the whole "unmeasured re
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:47:23 +
isis wrote:
> I could take those backdoored^W"pre-warmed" keys and put them to good use!
Hello,
Mkay, I'll get in touch in a few days.
As for other repliers, I would not mind explaining my reasoning in more detail,
if you have any specific questions or more a
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 05:32:17 +0500
Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:47:23 +
> isis wrote:
>
> > I could take those backdoored^W"pre-warmed" keys and put them to
> > good use!
>
> Hello,
>
> Mkay, I'll get in touch in a few days.
>
> As for other repliers, I would not mind ex
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 01:35:10 +
Yawning Angel wrote:
> The relay identity key is sensitive cryptographic material. Sharing it
> means the private key is compromised and is an attempt to subvert:
> * The bandwidth scanning process. The consensus weight is the relay's
>capacity relative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/25/2015 7:13 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 01:35:10 + Yawning Angel
> wrote:
>
>> The relay identity key is sensitive cryptographic material.
>> Sharing it means the private key is compromised and is an attempt
>> to subvert
11 matches
Mail list logo
