Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:08 AM, teor wrote: > The 20 July 2015 platform percentages on > https://metrics.torproject.org/servers-data.html are: > 87.9 Linux > 6.9 Windows > 4.5 FreeBSD > 0.5 Darwin (OS X, OpenDarwin, …) > 0.1 Other with counts... 6042 Linux 83% 889 Windows 12% 220 FreeBSD

Re: [tor-relays] How to Run High Capacity Tor Relays

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:06:14AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:08 AM, teor wrote: > > The 20 July 2015 platform percentages on > > https://metrics.torproject.org/servers-data.html are: > > 87.9 Linux > > 6.9 Windows > > 4.5 FreeBSD > > 0.5 Darwin (OS X, OpenDarwin, …) >

Re: [tor-relays] Running a relay in the Netherlands

Dear Gunes Acar, thanks for this optimistic e-mail. For the sake of geo-diversity, my relay will be placed in Wallonia :) A bit of research tells me that we are NATed here. Therefore I'm thinking of establishing a tunnel to a IPv6 broker, e.g., HE or similar with no traffic limits. Perhaps, th

Re: [tor-relays] OS market share on the Tor network

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> 6042 Linux 83% 889 Windows 12% 220 FreeBSD 3% 71 OpenBSD 1% 41 >> Darwin .5% 10 NetBSD .1% 5 SunOS 4 DragonFly 4 Bitrig 1 >> GNU/kFreeBSD 1 ElectroBSD >> >> Market share doesn't really say anything about ability to fill >> the relay role, > > Go