-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> But bottom line, the Tor Project apparently did nothing with the
> information.
Well, they apparently made (according to phw) an informed decision on
which attacks they should be spending the little available resources.
That is certainly more tha
On 2015-07-02 09:40:31 (+0200), Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
> Julius and I have been working on a design mockup for the ExoneraTor
> service for the past few months and would want to hear what you think
> about this:
>
> https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/exonerator-mockup/
Good job! T
t...@dserrano5.es thus spoke:
> Results: do we really need the "Exit: yes" column? Seems pretty redundant to
> me.
How so? All exits are relays, but not all relays are exits. And if a relay is
only configured as an exit for part of the time, that's a potentially important
part of the historic
On 2015-07-04 11:38:18 (-0400), Magnus Hedemark wrote:
> t...@dserrano5.es thus spoke:
>
> > Results: do we really need the "Exit: yes" column? Seems pretty redundant to
> > me.
>
> How so? All exits are relays, but not all relays are exits. And if a relay
> is only configured as an exit for part
At 10:04 7/4/2015 +0200, nusenu wrote:
>I find it more worrying that we do not "hear"
>about the 'more serious attacks' that keep
>them busy and don't allow them to look into
>i.e. 'AviatoChortler' (even after a few
>weeks). That might mean that there is a
>constant stream of 'more serious attacks
> I find it more worrying that we do not "hear" about the 'more serious
> attacks' that keep them busy and don't allow them to look into i.e.
> 'AviatoChortler' (even after a few weeks). That might mean that there
> is a constant stream of 'more serious attacks' (without information I
> can only gu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
OVH is by far the biggest AS on the tor network, in terms of
consensus weight (>12%),
guard probability (>15%),
middle propability (>14%)
and in the top 3 by exit probability(>7%).
Here are some AS stats for June 2015, that show which ASes adde
Sorry for hijacking, but I wasn't sure where best to put this.
As a programmer, where should I start if I am considering lending my time
to the tor project? While I feel that the BAD EXIT issue needs some love, I
defer to those with more knowledge on the state of things to direct my
efforts.
Is t
I'll hijack the response I'm a sysadmin, an unloved Windows one. My
unwanted $0.02 are:
- Windows installer (omg, Windows, the evil one which if you really want
greater adoption is the answer! Oh smokes, someone said it!
- change the architecture so running behind nat works (this is probab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> 2. Openness. Traditionally there's been some contention about where
> to draw the line between openness and secrecy. Personally this is
> what turned me off to this space [3]. Thankfully Philipp's moving
> us toward being a little less secretive. [
> Sorry for hijacking, but I wasn't sure where best to put this...
Glad you want to get involved! This would be more suited for its own
thread on tor-dev@ but that said, my top suggestion is: pick something
that interests you. Enjoying your involvement with open source and, by
extension, sticking
Thanks for all the useful links and directions.
We now return to our regularly scheduled program: "unflagged BAD EXIT
nodes, and the women who love them".
The other Damian
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 4:59 PM Damian Johnson wrote:
> > Sorry for hijacking, but I wasn't sure where best to put this...
On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 19:34:45 -0400
Ben Serebin wrote:
> I'll hijack the response I'm a sysadmin, an unloved Windows one.
> My unwanted $0.02 are:
>
> - Windows installer (omg, Windows, the evil one which if you really
> want greater adoption is the answer! Oh smokes, someone said it!
Ignorin
> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 19:34:45 -0400
> From: Ben Serebin
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] unflagged BAD EXIT nodes
>
> ?I'll hijack the response I'm a sysadmin, an unloved Windows one. My
> unwanted $0.02 are:
>
> - Windows installer (omg, Windows, the evil one which if you really want
> gre
> On 5 Jul 2015, at 11:37 , teor wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 19:34:45 -0400
>> From: Ben Serebin
>> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] unflagged BAD EXIT nodes
>>
>> ?I'll hijack the response I'm a sysadmin, an unloved Windows one. My
>> unwanted $0.02 are:
>>
>> - Windows installer (omg, W
15 matches
Mail list logo
