Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

How about the inverse question, what are some properties of a *less valuable* relay? Answers to this also help. One that comes to mind is one <100 kbps. What the minimum floor for a valuable relay these days? Second, I've also heard discussion that Amazon EC2 relays are relatively non-helpful.

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 01:07:28 + > From: > > I?m currently working with Dr. Virgil Griffith on Roster, a tor project that > aims to reward relay operators with good relays. > > Right now we are brainstorming how to measure/quantify a good relay. > > Besides the obvious requirements of a

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 01:07:28AM +, saitos...@ymail.com wrote: > Besides the obvious requirements of a good relay (e.g. speed, >geo-diversity, constant uptime), what qualities make a relay valuable >to the Tor network and its users? As mentioned in the other replies, "consistently runs a rec

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > I’m currently working with Dr. Virgil Griffith on Roster, a tor > project that aims to reward relay operators with good relays. > > Besides the obvious requirements of a good relay (e.g. speed, > geo-diversity, constant uptime), what qualities m

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

On 24 June 2015 at 03:09, Steve Snyder wrote: > On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:07pm, saitos...@ymail.com said: > >> Besides the obvious requirements of a good relay (e.g. speed, geo-diversity, >> constant uptime), what qualities make a relay valuable to the Tor network >> and its >> users? > > A qua

Re: [tor-relays] Raspberry Pi - Relay Setup

Hi All, I think we are deviating from the issue here. I have installed Tor.. Everything is good on my Pi 2 All i want to know is how do i open ports for Tor on my NetGear DGN1000 router Thanks, Bunty - >

Re: [tor-relays] Raspberry Pi - Relay Setup

 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=DGN1000+open+ports   may give you a start.Robert ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Problems with second/third relay

Really need some help here, just cannot find the answer. I've been running 2 middle relays for a year now, from a home/business IP, one DSL and the other cable. Only problems were brief and IP induced all has served the system well. I recently attempted to add a 3rd relay on the same cable feed a

Re: [tor-relays] Problems with second/third relay

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Are they all on the same IP address? You can only have 2 relays per IP address. T On 24/06/2015 15:22, TORnet Zone wrote: > Really need some help here, just cannot find the answer. > > I've been running 2 middle relays for a year now, from a > home/

Re: [tor-relays] Problems with second/third relay

The DSL is separate, the cable does NOW have 2 relays on the IP address. How can I work around the limitations to get the 2 working on the one address? Forwards haven't been effective yet, nor DMZ.GOn June 24, 2015 at 10:24 AM Thomas White wrote:-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Are th

Re: [tor-relays] Problems with second/third relay

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Thanks for adding one more relay. It's ok to have 2 relays on one IP address, both should work. What do you mean you have enabled DMZ and port forwarding? If you enable DMZ, that will forward ALL ports to 1 IP address in the subnet (NAT). Y

Re: [tor-relays] Problems with second/third relay

I will try all that shortly, thanks. They are static addresses.I had .140 on DMZ, and ***.199 on port fwd:9001, because it would not open the ORport otherwise - now I understand why. After that, the DMZ would not find :9001, the fwd seemed to circumvent it. So I changed the DMZ to port 443, b

Re: [tor-relays] exit to youtu.be via germany gema

exact, thats what im talking about   Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2015 23:28 schrieb cacahuatl :   On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:00:53PM +0200, tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote: german exit for https://youtu.be/ is breaking functionality due to disunity between google and gema. since years no

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

Steve Snyder: > On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 9:07pm, saitos...@ymail.com said: > >> Besides the obvious requirements of a good relay (e.g. speed, geo-diversity, >> constant uptime), what qualities make a relay valuable to the Tor network >> and its >> users? > > A quality that can't be measured:

Re: [tor-relays] A bridge too far

jchase transcribed 0.8K bytes: > Hello, > Can anybody help me figure out why my bridge has stopped showing the > flags fast, running and stable? Especially stable, I would love to get > that flag back. I run two bridges, on two different Rasp Pi's, the one > with a globe fingerprint of B08284109C72

[tor-relays] Fwd: [Site5 #TZZN-12908]: DMCA Complaint: mybox.ganton.ca

Any advice on how to handle the following?? bg Forwarded Message Subject:[Site5 #TZZN-12908]: DMCA Complaint: mybox.ganton.ca Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:29:24 + From: Site5 Level 2 Support To: bgan...@tanglewood-cottage.ca

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: [Site5 #TZZN-12908]: DMCA Complaint: mybox.ganton.ca

Send back a reply using this template: https://www.torproject.org/eff/tor-dmca-response.html ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: [Site5 #TZZN-12908]: DMCA Complaint: mybox.ganton.ca

See: https://tor.eff.org/eff/tor-dmca-response.html.en For more abuse reponses, see: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorAbuseTemplates https://www.torservers.net/wiki/abuse/templates If your ISP threatens to shut down your service because of DMCA spam, you might consider using h

[tor-relays] Ports 465 and 587 vanished from reduced exit policy?

It appears that some years ago someone quietly removed port 465 and 587 from the reduced exit policy at https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy without an explanation. I've added them back in, since these ports should only be used for user-authenticated SMTP, and not sp

Re: [tor-relays] Ports 465 and 587 vanished from reduced exit policy?

On 06/25/2015 02:38 AM, Mike Perry wrote: > I've added them back in, since these ports should only be used for > user-authenticated SMTP, and not spam. Has anyone experienced any abuse > from these ports that involved non-authenticated mail/spam? We don't. -- Moritz Bartl https://www.torservers.

Re: [tor-relays] Qualities of a good relay (Sean Saito)

Wow, thank you all for the suggestions! Hope to implement these soon. Would definitely appreciate more ideas too. Sean___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays