Hello,
We have been operating a moderately successful public tor relay for a
while now. Having read about how TOR works back a couple of years ago, I
was more or less sold on the idea that if traffic originating on your
local network uses your own TOR relay as the first hop (entry node), then
by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
On 5/20/2015 12:07 PM, Tor User wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been operating a moderately successful public tor relay for
> a while now. Having read about how TOR works back a couple of
> years ago, I was more or less sold on the idea that i
Roger Dingledine writes:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:02:27PM +, nusenu wrote:
>> now even DocTor starts to complain
>>
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-consensus-health/2015-May/005772.html
>From what I've seen, there were only two messages from DocTor about
this (Mon May 18 0
To be a bwauth you have to be a dirauth, if the bwauth draft spec I read
was correct. But how do you become a dirauth? The addresses are
hardcoded into Tor, so it's not like I could just spin up a dirauth in
an evening and let the network do the rest. There's got to be more to it.
I was interested
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015, Speak Freely wrote:
> To be a bwauth you have to be a dirauth, if the bwauth draft spec I read
> was correct. But how do you become a dirauth? The addresses are
> hardcoded into Tor, so it's not like I could just spin up a dirauth in
> an evening and let the network do
Some possible fallout related to
the earlier discussion
[tor-relays] amount of unmeasured relays continuously rising since 2 weeks
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-May/007003.html
My relay
Binnacle 4F0DB7E687FC7C0AE55C8F243DA8B0EB27FBF1F2
has 9375 Kbyte (75 Mbit) of u
Should probably add that this
relay was tuned and would be
expected to show somewhat better
performance than a typical relay
of the same capacity, but
I wouldn't expect more than
a 20-30% boost from that.
The local bandwidth observation
was, at the time of the consensus
sample
published 2015-05-2
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:16:36PM -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> but in the last few days the BWAuths'
> opinion went from
>
> bw1-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=7100
> *bw2-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=9330
> bw3-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=13700 GuardFraction=69
> bw4-w Bandwidth=7382 Me
Hi all,
Wanted to provide an update (even if it's not as good news as I hoped
to give) because I know this is a very frustrating issue for everyone.
At a high level, the bwauth scripts segment the network into four
segments ranked by relay speed, and measure each of these segments.
They are 0-10,
