s I read it, the tor browser bundle 3.x FAQ [1] implies that bridges on
windows can use only obfs3 of the provided pluggable transports. Can
someone let me know if this is correct?
The obfs3 line (as described in torrc-defaults) works fine, but torrc
won't even accept obfs2, let alone fteproxy or
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:50:48 +0100
Alexander Dietrich wrote:
> So it's probably safer to wait for obfs4proxy to show up in Ubuntu
> repositories. Is there already a plan for that?
There are no plans for this currently, and it is unlikely to happen
unless someone steps up to do it.
Regards,
-
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:30:57 +
eliaz wrote:
> s I read it, the tor browser bundle 3.x FAQ [1] implies that bridges
> on windows can use only obfs3 of the provided pluggable transports.
> Can someone let me know if this is correct?
Huh? What does a old browser bundle FAQ have to do with runni
Ok, I'll bite: what would somebody have to know to make this happen?
---
PGP Key: https://dietrich.cx/pgp | 0x727A756DC55A356B
On 2015-02-16 15:39, Yawning Angel wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:50:48 +0100
Alexander Dietrich wrote:
So it's probably safer to wait for obfs4proxy to show up in Ub
Just another update about this.
It took about a day for Tor Weather to report that a different server
went down...
It took about 3 days for it to notice the first server went down.
So, it's slower than molasses, but it will report system failures
eventually.
--
Speak Freely
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi David,
thanks for creating ansible-tor. I added two features that are crucial
to me and maybe useful for others as well. If you like it, feel free
to merge - this is my first ansible experience and it is lightly tested.
Example:
lets say you hav
Hi Nusenu,
Thanks for the patch. You've added quite a bit more features than 2.
Would you mind telling me which 2 features are critical for your
use-case and why?
Can you share your ansible-tor playbook? Perhaps a redacted copy if
you have sensitive information in it...
I'd like for this ansible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi David,
thanks for your quick feedback.
> Would you mind telling me which 2 features are critical for your
> use-case and why?
- - automatic instance deployment (and all the dependencies that comes
with that, like ORListenAddress - without it to
Yawning Angel:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:30:57 +
eliaz wrote:
>> s I read it, the tor browser bundle 3.x FAQ [1] implies that bridges
>> on windows can use only obfs3 of the provided pluggable transports.
>> Can someone let me know if this is correct?
>Huh? What does a old browser bundle FAQ ha
I run a relay with decently high bandwidth, but limited monthly transit
(3TB out).
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/2EC042F4274CC8A54381C78E8D1BF322FA26A095
I gathered from previous discussions that a fast node that goes into
hibernation is more beneficial to the network than an artificially
t
responding inline
>> Would you mind telling me which 2 features are critical for your
>> use-case and why?
>
> - - automatic instance deployment (and all the dependencies that comes
> with that, like ORListenAddress - without it tor0 would block tor2 from
> starting since they are binding on the s
Alexander Dietrich transcribed 0.9K bytes:
> Ok, I'll bite: what would somebody have to know to make this happen?
I know nothing of Ubuntu's policies for package inclusion in their
distribution channels; you might try asking their developers. However,
obfs4proxy will likely never be included in D
12 matches
Mail list logo
