Dear list members,
We are happy to present the preleminary analysis results from :
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.1823v1.pdf
The conclusions are:
1. We have found that AS-path prediction techniques significantly
overestimate ASes and IXes traversed by Tor traffic, calling into question
the re
Hi,
Due to m limited bandwidth I've decided to turn my relay into a bridge.
I seem to have everything right except if I restart tor I get a warning
that "managed proxy obfsproxy is 'closed'". I'm sure this has come up in
the past but I can find it in the archives.
In torrc I have:
SocksPort 0
ORPor
jchase writes:
> Hi,
> Due to m limited bandwidth I've decided to turn my relay into a bridge.
> I seem to have everything right except if I restart tor I get a warning
> that "managed proxy obfsproxy is 'closed'". I'm sure this has come up in
> the past but I can find it in the archives.
> In to
Will the available obfs4proxy package work on Raspberry Pis, or do we
have to compile it from source, like the tor binary?
Best regards,
Alexander
---
PGP Key: 0xC55A356B | https://dietrich.cx/pgp
On 2014-09-26 12:32, Yawning Angel wrote:
Hello everyone,
As people who have been following Tor
> From: George Kadianakis
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] obfsproxy not working on bridge relay
> Message-ID: <874mve973h@riseup.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> jchase writes:
>
>> Hi,
>> Due to m limited bandwidth I've decided to turn my relay into a b
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:10:08 +0200
Alexander Dietrich wrote:
> Will the available obfs4proxy package work on Raspberry Pis, or do we
> have to compile it from source, like the tor binary?
obfs4proxy has both armel and armhf packages in unstable. The armel
packages should work, the armhf packag
