Hi,
> On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:57 PM, kingqueen wrote:
>
> On 26 June 2014 17:08:51 BST, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
>> And that Tor node list is, in fact, a web page.
>>
> Yes, I understand how it happens. I was just asking how much of an
> inconvenience
> spam caused by such listings cau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
You have to take care, that your mail provider has appropriate tools to
recognize Spam like Spamassassin.
On 27. Juni 2014 10:18:52 MESZ, Kali Tor wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>> On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:57 PM, kingqueen
>wrote:
>>
>> On 26 June 2014 17
Hello Kali,
> Had a similar situation. My take is - it is never too late to obfuscate. It
> does matter.
Thank you! I have done. Random Person
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
___
grarpamp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, David Hill wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:35:00AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >> ja...@icetor.is wrote:
> >>
> >> > http://www.coindesk.com/adopt-node-project-aims-bolster-bitcoin-network-security/
> >> >
> >> Assuming that the re
Finally got around to compiling 'openssl'
and 'libevent' with AddressSanitizer.
Found and patched one minor bug as
a consequence
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12227
After running for a week the relay lost
its guard status due to declining
BWAUTH measurements. At the time
Comcas
I'm running a relay that I do not intend to use for anything else, so I set
SocksPort to 0. I usually have two or three circuits established anyway,
though, so I guess I haven't managed to disable creating those. I'm not
sure what they are for. They are always labeled "Purpose:
Ags=is_internal,need
