Hi,
I've seen this error message twice now within about 12 hours:
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
If I read the script correctly, it tries to upload the data and then
deletes it without checking for successful upload.
Since the data is probably lost, should I st
https://onionoo.torproject.org/details?type=bridge&search=NODENAME
Replace "NODENAME" above (actually it can match any field about a node).
"type=bridge&" can be left out if you want to seach all nodes.
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] O
Hi,
That's odd, please send us your ip address and we will look into this and
get back to you asap. Feel free to send me your ip by private mail if you
feel more comfortable.
I would suggest that you keep running the script, we will check your
submitted data and then we go from there.
--
Mi
I have configured Tor with the following (with daily accounting):
RelayBandwidthRate 384 KB
RelayBandwidthBurst 512 KB
I always assumed that the burst bandwidth will set the maximum relay
bandwidth. However, by using iftop, I can see individual connections
with speeds as high as 2+ Mbps. Even wh
Those settings are "kilobyte per second", so you're currently allowing 4
megabit per second as burst.
So unless there's many concurrent 2 Mbps connections, sounds ok.
Best regards,
Alexander
---
PGP Key: 0xC55A356B | https://dietrich.cx/pgp
On 2014-02-08 15:28, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
I have co
Yes, sorry. I do know the difference between the two, but my morning
coffee was not kicking in yet, and I was definitely not paying
attention. Thanks for taking the time to point out my mistake.
On a similar subject, is there a way to limit Tor's "per connection"
speed, i.e., not total speed. Assu
Hi Jason. Yup, I've seen this as well. I'm hoping that the regression
came in with the interpretor panel, which caused some other confusing
side effects as well...
https://trac.torproject.org/6439
Unfortunately this issue doesn't have a good, reliable repro besides
'wait for a week and see if it
On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:56:23 +, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
...
> On a similar subject, is there a way to limit Tor's "per connection"
> speed, i.e., not total speed.
No.
> Assuming that a single connection carries
> only one "conversation" between two parties at a time, wouldn't limiting
> a singl
...
> Actually, what would that be good for? As long as a relay is so lightly
> loaded that the active connections each can have more than than, there
> is no point in throttling them, and as soon as there isn't, they're
> fair-share-throttled down below that anyway.
Uhm, my thought was to make T
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:41:21PM +0100, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:56:23 +, Tora Tora Tora wrote:
> ...
> > On a similar subject, is there a way to limit Tor's "per connection"
> > speed, i.e., not total speed.
>
> No.
Actually there is:
PerConnBWRate N bytes|KByte
10 matches
Mail list logo
