Gordon Morehouse:
> Paul Garrett Hugel:
> > Please steer me to the correct list if off topic here
> >
> > Remote machine is Ubuntu obfsproxy bridge on amazon ec2 using ARM
> >
> > My local machine running 10.9 Mavericks with
> > TorBrowser-Pluggable-Transports-2.4.17-beta-2-pt3-osx-i386
> >
> >
On 11/03/2013 03:30 AM, t...@tafb.xxx wrote:
> I'm new to running a relay. There are lots of exit policies when I
> look at my atlas details:
>
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/DDB401F4CA108C6F6AF4E0DCE2DFC3407F577B21
> Is this a pretty good exit policy list to prevent harassment from my ISP?
On Saturday 02 Nov 2013 22:30:00 t...@tafb.xxx wrote:
> I'm new to running a relay. There are lots of exit policies when I look at
> my atlas details:
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/DDB401F4CA108C6F6AF4E0DCE2DFC3407F577
> B21
>
> Is this a pretty good exit policy list to prevent harassmen
This morning I got my first Tor traffic flood since upgrading to 2.4.x.
Logs didn't say anything about not being able to handle the amount of
circuit creation requests, but it showed a 200x increase in active TAP
circuits (~400k/hour) and the traffic pattern is the same: Advertising
100kb bandwidth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
starlight.201...@binnacle.cx:
>> The question is, should I put in an adjustment for
>> 'MaxAdvertisedBandwidth' during the backup window or make any
>> other change to advise remote relays to de-prioritize the node
>> for the duration?
[snip]
> So t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Paritesh Boyeyoko:
> On Friday 01 Nov 2013 14:39:28 Gordon Morehouse wrote:
>
>> Completely aside from the ethical and censorship-related buzzsaw
>> you're about to run into for posting this (perennial) question, I
>> believe some actual developers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dan Staples:
> This morning I got my first Tor traffic flood since upgrading to
> 2.4.x. Logs didn't say anything about not being able to handle the
> amount of circuit creation requests, but it showed a 200x increase
> in active TAP circuits (~400k/
I am also running on a Pi Model B, 512MB RAM. How are you logging SYNs?
On Sun 03 Nov 2013 11:25:26 AM EST, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> * *BEGIN ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* *
>
> Dan Staples:
>> This morning I got my first Tor traffic flood since upgrading to
>> 2.4.x. Logs didn't say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dan Staples:
> I am also running on a Pi Model B, 512MB RAM. How are you logging
> SYNs?
Ah yes, that's right.
You will find all the magic (very pre-alpha at the moment - it's
iptables commands in /etc/rc.local) in contrib/90_slowboards as part
of
On 11/03/2013 at 6:51 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Where did you copy that policy from?
It is the default policy that was installed with Vidalia.
> A more conservative approach would be whitelisting, ie. Only
> allow specific ports while blocking all others. The "reduced
> exit policy" is such a whi
Let me chime in here in regards to torrents to be perhaps not the
devil's, but the radical's advocate.
I'm sure everyone here will agree that a good case can be made that
copyright laws as they stand today are a perversion of, and
counter-productive to, their original stated intention of "advancem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't think this is the right place for you to try and justify your refusal
to pay for content people create. I think most people on this list would prefer
you keep political opinions not related to tor off list.
Cheers
Ramo
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013
> your refusal to pay for content people create.
That's a silly smear.
> not related to tor
That's just plain silly.
Did you really enter this thread just to flame? That's also silly.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https:/
On Sunday 03 Nov 2013 23:50:58 Lukas Erlacher wrote:
> Censor torrents because your provider will shut you down if you
> generate DMCA complaints and C&D's; censor them because you truly
> believe that the torrents are a necessary sacrifice to allow the Tor
> network to continue to function; don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
