I want to use Tor browser bundle to set up a Tor exit node
in vidalia, I click "set up relay" -> sharing
then there are some options,
I checked "Relay traffic for the Tor network(exit relay)" and then click
"ok"
however, it doesn't work, and the exit relay option is automatically
unchecked, while
On 29.11.2012 11:24, esolve esolve wrote:
> I checked "Relay traffic for the Tor network(exit relay)" and then click
> "ok"
> however, it doesn't work, and the exit relay option is automatically
> unchecked, while the option "relay traffic inside the tor network
> (non-exit relay)" is checked
Ex
but why the option "Relay traffic for the Tor network(exit relay)" is
unchecked?
and how to make the node just act as an exit node(make it not relay traffic
to other tor nodes)?
2012/11/29 Moritz Bartl
> On 29.11.2012 11:24, esolve esolve wrote:
> > I checked "Relay traffic for the Tor network(
On 29.11.2012 11:39, esolve esolve wrote:
> but why the option "Relay traffic for the Tor network(exit relay)" is
> unchecked?
Have you checked some boxes under "Exit Policies" too?
> and how to make the node just act as an exit node(make it not relay
> traffic to other tor nodes)?
You can't.
2012/11/29 Moritz Bartl
> On 29.11.2012 11:39, esolve esolve wrote:
> > but why the option "Relay traffic for the Tor network(exit relay)" is
> > unchecked?
>
> Have you checked some boxes under "Exit Policies" too?
>
ah, it is OK now, thanks!
>
> > and how to make the node just act as an exi
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:50:13 +, esolve esolve wrote:
...
> You mean I can't make it only function as an exit node using TBB?
> or it is no way to make it function only as an exit node except that I
> modify the source codes?
Path selection is done on the originating tor node; if you announce
y
On 29.11.2012 11:50, esolve esolve wrote:
> > and how to make the node just act as an exit node(make it not relay
> > traffic to other tor nodes)?
> You can't.
> You mean I can't make it only function as an exit node using TBB?
> or it is no way to make it function only as an exit node
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:50:13 +0100
esolve esolve wrote:
> You mean I can't make it only function as an exit node using TBB?
> or it is no way to make it function only as an exit node except that I
> modify the source codes?
Why would you want to? If you're trying to maximise the traffic that
you
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:57:09 +0100
Andreas Krey wrote:
> Path selection is done on the originating tor node; if you announce
> yourself as an exit node you implicitly also announce yourself as a
> potential entry/middle node. You'd have to change everybody else's
> source to be exit-only.
Well,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:16:35 +, Julian Yon wrote:
...
> Well, no. You could add some code to drop any connections you don't
> like (i.e. those you can't snoop).
Yes, but that would make you stand out detectably, wouldn't it?
Andreas
--
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torva
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:51:38 +0100
Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:16:35 +, Julian Yon wrote:
> ...
> > Well, no. You could add some code to drop any connections you don't
> > like (i.e. those you can't snoop).
>
> Yes, but that would make you stand out detectably, wouldn't it?
I believe the original question was as simple as "how do I act as a
relay while acting as an exit node"
the user was confused because when he had selected exit, it unchecked
the relay checkbox.
On 11/29/2012 11:59 AM, Julian Yon wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:51:38 +0100
Andreas Krey wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:29:11 +
k...@damnfbi.tk wrote:
> I believe the original question was as simple as "how do I act as a
> relay while acting as an exit node"
> the user was confused because when he had selected exit, it unchecked
> the relay checkbox.
If you believe that, then you didn'
>> BridgeRelay 1
>>
>> so, its pure relay.
RD> It's a bridge, not a public relay:
RD> https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#RelayOrBridge
>> Run arm and got:
>> "flags: none"
RD> So it isn't listed in the consensus, and thus arm doesn't think it
RD> has any flags.
Thanks for an answer!
Simple
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:17:20 +0100
andron wrote:
>
> >> BridgeRelay 1
> >>
> >> so, its pure relay.
>
> RD> It's a bridge, not a public relay:
> RD> https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq#RelayOrBridge
>
> Simple question: how to be listed in the consensus?
BridgeRelay 0
(or comment it out, as
On 11/29/2012 01:46 PM, Julian Yon wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:29:11 +
k...@damnfbi.tk wrote:
I believe the original question was as simple as "how do I act as a
relay while acting as an exit node"
the user was confused because when he had selected exit, it unchecked
the relay checkbox.
It would just seem really frustrating for users who want to participate
in account based sites (and really, what sites aren't) to find themselves
kneejerk blocked at the network level.
Tor is slow, there's really no claim to be made that Tor is capable
of literally DoSing a site. Only one for cran
Also related, has anyone tried operating an exit
behind a VPN/NAT/proxy service? As opposed
to having secondary interfaces/routes on the
local machine.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailma
On Wednesday, 28. November 2012, 14:47:05 Damian Johnson wrote:
> Have you tried tweaking the query rate options in your armrc?
>
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/arm.git/blob/HEAD:/armrc.sample
No I have not yet tried this.
>
> > Switching to the connection panel lets arm often freeze. Is the
> From: elijah wright
> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:38:51 -0600
> Cc: na...@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node.
> We had a guy (aka potential customer) inquire the other day about hosting a
> Tor exit on our infrastructure the other day; he disappeared fairly
>
> Doing netstat queries means that I get 8+ ip addresses on my server.
> Each of these addresses I would have to check against the list of relays to
> sort out connections to other relays and only do GETINFO ip-to-country to
> the remaining IPs. This sounds complicated and error-prone.
Not rea
>> Running an exit node from home DSL or Cable is bad idea. One must look
>> for a Tor friendly ISP and have balls made of steel!
... ISP[/hoster] and[/or] have ...
> However, I do not believe it is that way in
> the United States
What 'way'?
Running an exit node at home, or elsewhere, would s
22 matches
Mail list logo
