On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> I'm especially hoping to hear from volunteers for whom setting up a few
> extra bridges is basically free -- for example, those already running
> fast non-exit relays who have a few more IP addresses nearby. This is
> also a nice way for
On 13.08.2012 12:56, Andrew Beveridge wrote:
> I guess I fit into that category - the exit I run (mentioned previously
> in the exit funding thread) is on a server which has about 3 free IP
> addresses which I'm not using right now - I could easily use them as
> fast unpublished bridges if somebody
Roger Dingledine:
Hi Roger,
> We're in an interesting situation here, where we can use their bridge
> funding for other more important things if we don't spent it all on
> bridges. So maybe the subject should have been the more counterintuitive
> "Help fund Tor bundle usability by running a fast
>> Sorry for exposing the internals of running
>> a non-profit. But I think transparency is especially important here. :)
>
> I don't know why you feel sorry. Transparency is important for
> non-profit, at least for most I guess.
Non-profit is just a tax and legal designation. After any necessary
ON Saturday, August 11. 2012, 18:25:03 Roger Dingledine wrote:
> The constraints are:
> * 100mbit+ connectivity, though in practice I expect they will spend
> most of their time doing far less than that.
> * No more than 2 bridges per /24. If you're running fast (100mbit+)
> exits (which is more im
