Hi,
when I browse through the list of relays I find many router names,
which correlate in some way, but which don't specify a family in their
descriptors.
Just to name a few:
* 2* c5VycfOP
* 3* c516a
* Caldron, Caldron2, Caldron3
* BlgTOR2, BlgTOR
* DwarfHappy, DwarfSleepy, DwarfSneezy, DwarfDope
> is there a reason...
Probably because they didn't realize that they should. If there's
contact information available then feel free to ask them to set it.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/
Probably just misconfigured. If there are emails attached to the nodes you
could try mailing them directly about it.
brwyatt
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 01:29:42 +0100, "Aurel W." wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I browse through the list of relays I find many router names,
> which correlate in some way, but which
(I'm quite new here, but...)
If you only run 1 node, is there any reason to set the Family? My
reading of https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en
(MyFamily, NodeFamily) suggests that it's not relevant for the 1-node
case.
Thanks,
Greg
2012/1/5 Tor Relays at brwyatt.net :
> Probably jus
No, there no reason to set MyFamily when you only admin a single node.
That said, I just followed the link you referenced, and it leaves my
scratching head a little. The description of NodeFamily is:
"The Tor servers, defined by their identity fingerprints or nicknames,
constitute a "family"
Can someone tell how being a bridge compares to being a regular exit
node in terms of traffic?
I can see how there would less traffic as a bridge since the node isn't
advertised. On the other hand, there are many fewer bridges than
regulat nodes so maybe the traffic on a given bridge is great
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:21:44 -0500
Steve Snyder wrote:
> Can someone tell how being a bridge compares to being a regular exit
> node in terms of traffic?
The difference is vast. Exit nodes will use all configured bandwidth.
Bridges, depending how many users you attract, are more variable in
usa
