-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/30/2017 06:59 PM, dawuud wrote:
>
> btw you just wrote sent an encrypted message to a public mailing
> list. i don't see the point in doing this, maybe is was an
> accident?
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/29/2017 06:02 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> In the mean while I got a reasonable bw back.
And again , one relay is at bw=20 (fropm about 60,000) whereas the other (same
hardware, just different ip and port) has bw=3000.
Both have nearly identic
btw you just wrote sent an encrypted message to a public mailing list.
i don't see the point in doing this, maybe is was an accident?
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tor-rela
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Charset: utf-8
hQQOA9vCYl42+L0WEA//VFaxE6QcaoO0VzW4rkSlbceYTu7yPgBX1u80HWJwGvVB
4Wv/Wk0YpaKl2FKQvo0tU01021f8Qf9e3cHDHeu7DcxTb6TDkOGE3M6BYZndGFz+
6d7sWe2E2kUXQQpZbjjvsjSqIE1r/OdSb2jyQnj75HkMrOsR1df0FzQ+CtnKMoyN
mKijc41Mc6Bt3lvJkdBNpbOnCiuxZWQnnow5iR+dism0uW9kIqIcc38/2jG3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/29/2017 01:59 AM, teor wrote:
> Do you have errors in your log
no, except 1 or 2 few http errors for faharvar that a consensus upload failed
or so.
In the mean while I got a reasonable bw back.
But b/c the were 3 "outages" within a week for
> On 28 Sep 2017, at 06:06, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> I do wonder why both longclaw and Faravahar seems since few days not to reach
> my relays 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA and
> 6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215 respectively - resulting in a bw
> value of
