On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 06:16:25AM +, oneoft...@riseup.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone point me to an overview of the different legal situations for
> running tor relays in European countries? I'm especially interested how the
> situation differs per country.
>
I'm from the luxembourgish tor
Moritz Bartl wrote
Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:58:00 +0100:
| >>> I mean the only reason, why there is more Tor-Exit-IPs
| in the abuse log than any other single unique IP is that there is tens
| of thousand of users using each Tor-Exit.
| >> If this claim could be substantiated by some numbers
On 03/11/2015 10:57 PM, yl wrote:
>>> I mean the only reason, why there is more Tor-Exit-IPs
in the abuse log than any other single unique IP is that there is tens
of thousand of users using each Tor-Exit.
>> If this claim could be substantiated by some numbers it'd certainly help.
> I fu
Am 09.03.2015 um 23:39 schrieb Markus Hitter:
>> I mean the only reason, why there is more Tor-Exit-IPs
>> > in the abuse log than any other single unique IP is that there is tens
>> > of thousand of users using each Tor-Exit.
> If this claim could be substantiated by some numbers it'd certainly he
On 2015-03-09 18:40, Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 09.03.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Steve Snyder:
Being able to separate webmail from the parent web presence (e.g.
gmail from google.com, Yahoo Mail from yahoo.com, etc.) would be a
big step forward in curbing spam. This would allow the exit
operation to re
This is definitely a positive for the UK. One of many battles we could
have easily lost to a conservative government pushing authoritarian
policies. As long as it doesn't get pushed under the carpet this could
help defend the cause of civil liberties. Here are two articles on it:
http://bit.ly/199d
In the UK:
The darknet and online anonymity - POST Note
Published 09 March 2015
It's a briefing from The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology,
mainly about Tor.
http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/POST-PN-488/the-darknet-and-online-anonymity
Jan
___
Am 09.03.2015 um 23:09 schrieb yl:
> So wouldn't the correct solution also be to educate the administrators
> of such services?
Yes, of course. With the _also_ underlined.
> I mean the only reason, why there is more Tor-Exit-IPs
> in the abuse log than any other single unique IP is that there is
On March 9, 2015 11:16:34 PM yl wrote:
Am 09.03.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Markus Hitter:
> It certainly wasn't meant this way. The point of these considerations is:
of what use is an anonymous network if virtually no website accepts
connections from it? Right: it's of not much use, with most of t
Am 09.03.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Markus Hitter:
> It certainly wasn't meant this way. The point of these considerations is: of
> what use is an anonymous network if virtually no website accepts connections
> from it? Right: it's of not much use, with most of the public internet
> blocked you can c
Am 09.03.2015 um 20:33 schrieb grarpamp:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
>> > Am 09.03.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Steve Snyder:
>>> >> Being able to separate webmail from the parent web presence (e.g.
>>> >> gmail from google.com, Yahoo Mail from yahoo.com, etc.) would be a
>>> >
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:41 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> You could create a user maintained wikitable of all countries in
> regard to line items of relavence to people in anonymizing networks,
> crypto, retention, etc.
In fact, collaboration with researchers such as Koops to present the
relavent info in
++ 09/03/15 06:16 + - oneoft...@riseup.net:
Can someone point me to an overview of the different legal situations
for running tor relays in European countries? I'm especially
interested how the situation differs per country.
I can't really help you: I don't have the overview of Europe, nor
On Monday, March 9, 2015 3:33pm, "grarpamp" said:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
>> Am 09.03.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Steve Snyder:
>>> Being able to separate webmail from the parent web presence (e.g.
>>> gmail from google.com, Yahoo Mail from yahoo.com, etc.) would be a
>>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> On March 9, 2015 7:17:20 AM oneoft...@riseup.net wrote:
>> Can someone point me to an overview of the different legal situations
>> for running tor relays in European countries? I'm especially interested
>> how the situation differs per cou
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 09.03.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Steve Snyder:
>> Being able to separate webmail from the parent web presence (e.g.
>> gmail from google.com, Yahoo Mail from yahoo.com, etc.) would be a
>> big step forward in curbing spam. This would allow the
Am 09.03.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Steve Snyder:
> Being able to separate webmail from the parent web presence (e.g.
> gmail from google.com, Yahoo Mail from yahoo.com, etc.) would be a
> big step forward in curbing spam. This would allow the exit
> operation to refuse traffic to the webmail service w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.03.2015 um 16:02 schrieb s7r:
> Your arguments are fair and correct and mostly I tend to agree.
>
> But, the port scans, malware distribution and spamming existed before
> Tor, exist in parallel with Tor and will continue to exist even if Tor
>
On Monday, March 9, 2015 10:40am, "Markus Hitter" said:
> Am 09.03.2015 um 15:13 schrieb s7r:
[snip]
> One flaw which IMHO has to be solved sooner or later is the openess to abuse.
> Like
> port scans, like malware distribution, like spamming, you name it. Right now
> this
> task is left to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Markus,
Your arguments are fair and correct and mostly I tend to agree.
But, the port scans, malware distribution and spamming existed before
Tor, exist in parallel with Tor and will continue to exist even if Tor
will disappear.
I admin a lot of s
On March 9, 2015 3:14:37 PM s7r wrote:
Hi,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/9/2015 1:17 PM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> On March 9, 2015 7:17:20 AM oneoft...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> Can someone point me to an overview of the different legal
>> situations for ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.03.2015 um 15:13 schrieb s7r:
> This is a speculation and it's not backed up by anything real. Can you
> define "crack down on Tor"? People and organizations are researching
> and trying to find a flaw in Tor since Tor was born - there is a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/9/2015 1:17 PM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> On March 9, 2015 7:17:20 AM oneoft...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> Can someone point me to an overview of the different legal
>> situations for running tor relays in European countries? I'm
>>
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 06:16:25 +
oneoft...@riseup.net wrote:
> Can someone point me to an overview of the different legal situations
> for running tor relays in European countries? I'm especially
> interested how the situation differs per country.
Not exactly what you wanted, but this may be re
On March 9, 2015 7:17:20 AM oneoft...@riseup.net wrote:
Hi John,
Can someone point me to an overview of the different legal situations
for running tor relays in European countries? I'm especially interested
how the situation differs per country.
I don't think that we have something like that
25 matches
Mail list logo
