> Am 04.09.2016 um 06:52 schrieb daniel boone:
>> Ok, 1st on to MATT
>> "I missed your SOCKS question."
>> Well that doesnt matter because I took you advice on the first reply you
>> sent explaing things so I commented all again as suggested. So all is well
>> now on that part of the torrc file.
You're right, of course. The technically correct way would be to filter
by the List-Id field and thunderbird supports this. I actually didn't
know about this header field till now, thanks for pointing it out! But
as you said, most webmails are crap (gmail apparently supports it, but
not directly).
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:17 AM, jensm1 wrote:
> you can then configure your inbox to
> put everything containing [tor-relays] into its own folder
This is non ideal as it continues the poor notion that bloating everyone's
subject lines with, currently 13, characters of non content junk is a good i
Hi Daniel
One thing first: If you want to actively participate on this mailing
list on a regular basis, it would be best if you switched your
mailing-list-setting from digest to the actual mails (you can then
either configure your inbox to put everything containing [tor-relays]
into its own folder
I figure this is good news Matt and Jens:
Sep 04 01:06:39.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done.
Sep 04 06:53:35.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 5:47 hours, with 1 circuits open. I've sent 14.78 MB and received 22.64 MB.
Sep 04 06:53:35.000 [notice] Circuit handshake sta
Ok, 1st on to MATT
"I missed your SOCKS question."
Well that doesnt matter because I took you advice on the first reply you sent explaing things so I commented all again as suggested. So all is well now on that part of the torrc file.
What I did do was kept the ORPort at 9001. I tried 443 but in
